Benefit incidence analysis (BIA) is a tool to estimate the equity of healthcare benefits accrued to individuals across socio-economic groups. The results help to illustrate the extent of the effectiveness of public health resource allocation on public health by the government in meeting the needs of vulnerable populations. This article represents the most recent BIA completed in India and presents an analysis of the distribution of public spending in outpatient and inpatient care.
Purpose
This paper presents a benefit incidence analysis of the distribution of public spending in outpatient and inpatient care in India.
Methods
Benefit Incidence Analysis estimates healthcare benefit equity across socioeconomic groups. Data from the 75th National Sample Survey Organisation round was used for analysis. Disease burden, out-of-pocket expenses, and non-utilisation of public health services for outpatient and inpatient care were analysed. Concentration curves and indices were calculated for rural and urban areas.
Results
In rural areas, the utilisation of public health facilities for outpatient and inpatient care is concentrated among non-poor individuals but is more pro-poor for outpatient care. When both outpatient and inpatient care are considered together, public health spending approaches a more equitable distribution. However, for inpatient care, public health spending is more pro-poor, whereas for outpatient care, it is more pro-rich. In rural areas, public health spending on outpatient and inpatient care is more pro-poor compared to urban areas, where it tends to be more pro-rich.
Conclusion
Our analysis of equity between urban and rural health services using BIA reveals that public spending has not resulted in significantly pro-poor services in India.
AsanteA., PriceJ., HayenA., JanS., & WisemanV. (2016). Equity in health care financing in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of evidence from studies using benefit and financing incidence analyses. PLoS One, 11(4), e0152866.
2.
AsawanuchitS. S., DavoodiM. H. R., & TiongsonM. E. (2003). How useful are benefit incidence analyses of public education and health spending. International Monetary Fund.
3.
BalarajanY., SelvarajS., & SubramanianS. V. (2011). Health care and equity in India. The Lancet, 377(9764), 505–515.
4.
BanerjeeS. (2021). Determinants of rural–urban differential in healthcare utilization among the elderly population in India. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–18.
5.
BarikD., & ThoratA. (2015). Issues of unequal access to public health in India. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 245.
6.
BoseM., & BanerjeeS. (2019). Equity in distribution of public subsidy for noncommunicable diseases among the elderly in India: An application of benefit incidence analysis. BMC Public Health, 19, 1–12.
7.
BowserD., PatenaudeB., BhawalkarM., DuranD., & BermanP. (2019). Benefit incidence analysis in public health facilities in India: Utilization and benefits at the national and state levels. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18, 1–11.
8.
ChakrabortyL., SinghY., & JacobJ. F. (2012). Public expenditure benefit incidence on health: Selective evidence from India. NIPFP.
9.
ChakrabortyL., SinghY., & JacobJ. (2013). Analyzing public expenditure benefit incidence in health care: Evidence from India[Working papers series 748]. Levy Economics Institute.
10.
ChauhanS., GupteS. S., KumarS., & PatelR. (2021). Urban-rural differential in diabetes and hypertension among elderly in India: A study of prevalence, factors, and treatment-seeking. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 15(4), 102201.
11.
DemeryL. (2000). Benefit incidence: A practitioner’s guide. Poverty and social development group Africa region[Working paper 35117]. The World Bank.
12.
FanV. Y., KaranA., & MahalA. (2012). State health insurance and out-of-pocket health expenditures in Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 12, 189–215.
13.
JoeW., & RajpalS. (2018). Unravelling the socioeconomic gradient in the incidence of catastrophic health care expenditure: A comment. Health Policy and Planning, 33(5), 699–701.
14.
KasthuriA. (2018). Challenges to healthcare in India—The five A’s. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 43(3), 141–143.
15.
KastorA., & MohantyS. K. (2018). Disease-specific out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure on hospitalization in India: Do Indian households face distress health financing?PLoS One, 13(5), e0196106.
16.
KhanJ. A., AhmedS., MacLennanM., SarkerA. R., SultanaM., & RahmanH. (2017). Benefit incidence analysis of healthcare in Bangladesh—Equity matters for universal health coverage. Health Policy and Planning, 32(3), 359–365.
17.
KornE. L., & GraubardB. I. (1990). Simultaneous testing of regression coefficients with complex survey data: Use of Bonferroni t statistics. The American Statistician, 44(4), 270–276.
18.
LanjouwP., & RavallionM. (1999). Benefit incidence, public spending reforms, and the timing of program capture. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/13.2.257
19.
Love-KohJ., GriffinS., KataikaE., RevillP., SibandzeS., & WalkerS. (2020). Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low-and middle-income countries: An overview. Globalization and Health, 16, 1–12.
20.
McIntyreD., & AtagubaJ. E. (2011). How to do (or not to do)… a benefit incidence analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 26(2), 174–182.
21.
McIntyreD., & AtagubaJ. E. (2012). Modelling the affordability and distributional implications of future health care financing options in South Africa. Health Policy and Planning, 27(Suppl_1), i101–i112.
22.
Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (MOSPI), National Statistical Office, Government of India. (2019). Key indicators of social consumption in India (July 2017–June 2018). https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/KI_Health_75th_Final.pdf
23.
MohanP., & KumarR. (2019). Strengthening primary care in rural India: Lessons from Indian and global evidence and experience. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(7), 2169–2172.
24.
National Academies Press. (2016). Approaches to universal health coverage and occupational health and safety for the informal workforce in developing countries: Workshop summary. Forum on Public–Private Partnerships for Global Health and Safety; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK373408/
25.
National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India. (2018). National health accounts: Estimates for India, financial year 2015–16. https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/NHA_Estimates_Report_2015-16_0.pdf
26.
National Health Authority. (2021). Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY). https://pmjay.gov.in
27.
NCCID. (2016). Thinking about burden of disease with equity in mind. https://nccid.ca/publications/thinking-about-burden-of-disease-with-equity-in-mind/
28.
NgangbamS., & LadusinghL. (2015). Burden of disease and benefit incidence of public health expenditure in Northeast India. Journal of Health Management, 17(3), 328–338.
29.
PaulE., DevilleC., BodsonO., SambiéniN. K. E., ThiamI., BourgeoisM., RiddeV., & FecherF. (2019). How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18, 1–21.
30.
PrinjaS., KanavosP., & KumarR. (2012). Health care inequities in north India: Role of public sector in universalizing health care. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 136(3), 421–431.
31.
SangarS., DuttV., & ThakurR. (2019). Comparative assessment of economic burden of disease in relation to out of pocket expenditure. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, 9.
32.
SelvarajS., KaranA. K., MaoW., HasanH., BharaliI., KumarP., OgbuojiO., & ChaudhuriC. (2021). Did the poor gain from India’s health policy interventions? Evidence from benefit-incidence analysis, 2004–2018. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20, 1–15.
33.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. Open Access Library. https://www.oalib.com/references/5814356
34.
TiwariS. (2020, June26). India spent 1% of GDP on public health for 15 years. Result is vulnerability to crises. https://www.indiaspend.com/india-spent-1-of-gdp-on-public-health-for-15-years-result-is-vulnerability-to-crises/
35.
Van de WalleD., & NeadK. (Eds.) (1995). Public spending and the poor: Theory and evidence. World Bank Publications.
36.
World Health Organization. (2008). The World Health Report: Primary health care now more than ever. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43949
37.
ZodpeyS., & FarooquiH. H. (2018). Universal health coverage in India: Progress achieved & the way forward. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 147(4), 327–329.
