The purpose of this article is to examine the role of a workgroup’s openness to diversity (WOD) in shaping employees’ perception of human resources practices (HRPs), by focusing primarily on three types of diversity, namely visible diversity, value diversity and informational diversity. The study also examines the moderating effect of group membership on the relationship. Cross-sectional data through a survey of 533 employees of various leading information technology (IT) companies in India are used. The results suggest that a workgroup’s openness to diversity is a strong determinant of the perception of HRPs. It is observed that the workgroup’s openness to visible diversity has no significant impact on the perception of HRPs, whereas openness to value and informational diversity has a significant positive impact. The results also show that group membership moderates the relationship. In terms of the originality of this study, we contend that, to date, there is a paucity of empirical studies linking a workgroup’s openness to diversity with the perception of HRPs. Hence, the present study addresses this gap by examining the relationship, as well as the boundary conditions on this relationship.
AzmiF. T. (2011). Strategic human resource management and its linkage with HRM effectiveness and organizationl performance: Evidences from India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3888–3912.
2.
BeckerB., & GerhartB. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospect. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779–801.
3.
BowenD. E., & OstroffC. (2004). Understanding HRM–firm performance linkages: The role of the ‘Strength’ of the HRM system. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.
4.
BrewerM. B., & BrownR. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 554–594). McGrow-Hill.
5.
ByrneD. (1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural study. Human Relations, 24, 201–207.
6.
ChattopadhyayP. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273–287.
7.
ChenC.-J., & HuangJ.-W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104–114.
8.
ChitraK. N, & Chandra MohanA. (2017). Organizational culture and its influence on workplace diversity and inclusion. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 1032–1038.
9.
DasS. K., AzmiF. T., & JamesP. (2020). Factors influencing employees’ perception of human resource practice: A fuzzy interpretive structural modeling approach. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278682120908557
10.
de KokJ. M., & UhlanerL. M. (2001). Organization context and human resource management in small firms. Small Business Economics, 17, 273–291.
11.
DeleryJ. E., & DotyD. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802–835.
12.
Den HartogD., BoonC., VerburgR., & CroonM. (2013). HRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived perforrmance: A cross-level test. Journal of Management, 39, 1637–1665.
13.
ElyR. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 755–780.
14.
ElyR. J., & ThomasD. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273.
15.
Gould-WilliamsJ. (2003). The importance of HR Practice and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 28–54.
16.
GuthrieJ. (2001). High involvement work practice, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180–192.
17.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd.
18.
HarrisonD. A., PriceK. H., & BellM. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.
19.
HarrisonD. A., PriceK. H., GavinJ. H., & FloreyA. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045.
20.
HärtelC. E., & FujimotoY. (1999). Explaining why diversity sometimes has positive effects in organization and sometime has negative effect in organizations: The perceived dissimilarity openness moderator model. Academy of Management.
21.
HärtelC. E., & FujimotoY. (2000). Diversity is not the problem—Openness to perceived dissimilarity is. Journal of Management & Organization, 6(1), 14–27.
22.
HobmanE. V., BordiaP., & GalloisC. (2003). Consequence of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. Journal of Business & Psychology, 17(3), 301–325.
23.
HobmanE. V., BordiaP., & GalloisC. (2004). Perceived dissimilarity and work group involvement: The moderating effect of group openness to diversity. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 560–587.
24.
HomanA. C., van KnippenbergD., Van KaleefG. A., & De DreuC. K. (2007). Bridging the faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity belief, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189–1199.
25.
HuselidM. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
26.
IlgenD., HollenbeckJ., JohnsonM., & JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
27.
JiangK., LepakD. P., HuJ., & BaerJ. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294.
28.
JiangK., HuJ., LiuS., & LepakD. (2017). Understanding employees’ perception of human resource practices: Effects of demographic dissimilarity to managers and coworkers. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 69–91.
29.
KehoeR. R., & WrightP. M. (2013). The impact of high performance human resource practices on employees’ attitude and behavior. Journal of Management, 39, 366–391.
30.
LiaoH., ChuangA., & JoshiA. (2008). Perceived deep-level dissimilarity: Personality antecedents and impact on overall job attitude, helping, work withdrawal, and turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 106(2), 106–124.
31.
MacDuffieJ. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production system in the world of auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197–221.
32.
MaznevskiM. L. (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations, 47(5), 531–552.
33.
NarangL., & SinghL. (2012). Role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between HR practices and organizational trust. Global Business Review, 13(2), 239–249.
34.
NASSCOM. (2020). Strategic review: IT-BPM sector in India 2019: Decoding digital. NASSCOM.. IMaCs.
35.
NikoloskiK. (2016). Strategic human resouce management: Assessment and evaluation of human resource as factors to achieving better economic performance. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 8(3), 81–95.
36.
NishiiL. H., & WrightP. (2008). Variability within organization: Implication of strategic human resource management. In SmithD. B., & SmithD. B. (Ed.), The people make the place: Dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations (pp. 225–248). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
PaauweJ., WrightP., & GuestD. (2013). HRM and performance: What do we know and where we should go. In PaauweJ., GuestD., WrightP., PaauweJ., GuestD., & WrightP. (Eds.), HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges (pp. 1–13). Wiley.
38.
PfefferJ. (1991). Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. Journal of Management, 17(4), 789–803.
39.
PodsakoffP. M., & OrganD. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
40.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
41.
PradhanR. K., DashS., & JenaL. K. (2019). Do HR practices influence job satisfaction? Examining the mediating role of employee engagement in Indian public sector undertaking. Global Business Review, 20(1), 119–132.
42.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological contract in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. SAGE Publications.
43.
SalancikG. R., & PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.
44.
SawyerrO. O., StraussJ., & YanJ. (2005). Individual value structure and diversity attitude: The moderating effect of age, gender, race and religiosity. Journal of Manegerial Psychology, 20(5–6), 498–521.
45.
SheehanC. (2005). A model of HRM strategic integration. Personnel Review, 34(2), 192–209.
46.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS., & AustinW. G. (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
47.
TsuiA. S., & O’ReillyC. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402–423.
48.
TsuiA. S., EganT. D., & O’ReillyC. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579.
49.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In HoggM., OakesP., ReicherS., & WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Blackwell.
50.
VecchioR. P., & BullisR. C. (2001). Moderators of the influence of supervisor–subordinate similarity on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 884–896.
51.
WilliamsK. Y., & O’ReillyC. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
