Understanding the Fertility Behavior of Bengali-speaking Hindu and Hindi-speaking Hindu Populations Occupying Similar Urban Locale of Kolkata,West Bengal: A Snapshot Regarding Family Planning Decision-making Process
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2021
Understanding the Fertility Behavior of Bengali-speaking Hindu and Hindi-speaking Hindu Populations Occupying Similar Urban Locale of Kolkata,West Bengal: A Snapshot Regarding Family Planning Decision-making Process
This study was conducted to understand the fertility behavior between the two population groups speaking different languages: Bengali-speaking Hindus and Hindi-speaking Hindus. The study further attempts to study the perception and practice regarding contraception use and their decision-making ability. The present study was conducted in Kolkata, West Bengal. A total of 64 women (Bengali-speaking Hindus: 34 and Hindi-speaking Hindus: 30) ranging between 15 years and 44 years were chosen by convenience sampling method. Semi-structured interview schedule was employed to record the response of the participants. Sociodemographic profile of the participants and of their husbands and fertility history were collected using structured interview. Open-ended questions were asked to the participants to understand their perception about family planning. Case studies were also taken from each participant to know about their decision-making process of family planning. Descriptive statistic was carried out to analyze quantitative data, and for qualitative data, thematic analysis was carried out manually. Mean age of the participants was 33.1 years and that of their husbands was 40.2 years. Age at marriage was low in both the groups. Source of knowledge on contraceptives was mostly husband in both the populations. The husband (100%) played a dominant role in decision-making in both the groups. The role of in-laws played a dominant role in decision-making among the Hindi-speaking population. Withdrawal method was a common method of contraceptives in both the groups.
AgarwalA. (2008). Social classification: The need to update in the present scenario. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 33(1), 50–51.
2.
Al RiyamiA., AfifiM., & MabryR. M. (2004). Women’s autonomy, education and employment in Oman and their influence on contraceptive use. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(23), 144–154.
3.
BalkD. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women’s status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48(1), 21–45.
4.
BankoleA., & SinghS. (1998). Couple’s fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: Hearing the man’s voice. International Family Planning Perspectives, 24(1), 15–24.
5.
BarnettB., & SteinJ. (2001). Women’s voices, women’s lives: The impact family planning. The Women’s Studies Project.
6.
BasuA. M., & AminS. (2000). Conditioning factors for fertility decline in Bengal: History, language identity, and openness to innovations. Population and Development Review, 26, 761–794.
7.
BeckerS., Fonseca-BeckerF., & Schenck-YglesiasC. (2006). Husbands’ and wives’ reports of women’s decision-making power in Western Guatemala and their effects on preventive health behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 62(9), 2313–2326.
8.
BhasinM. K., & NagS. (2002). A demographic profile of the people of Jammu and Kashmir: Family planning. Journal of Human Ecology, 13, 147–166.
9.
BogaleB., WondafrashM., TilahunT., & GirmaE. (2011). Married women’s decision making power on modern contraceptive use in urban and rural southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 11, 342.
10.
ChackoE. (2001). Women’s use of contraception in rural India: A village-level study. Health Place, 7, 197–208.
11.
ChattopadhyayM., WhiteM. J., & DebpuurC. (2006). Migrant fertility in Ghana: Selection versus adaptation and disruption as causal mechanisms. Population Studies, 60(2), 189–203.
Couple Communication. (1998). Chapter 5. In: New perspectives on men’s participation. Baltimore, Maryland, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 1998 (Population Reports 1998, series J, no. 46).
14.
Dixon-MullerR. (1999). Gender inequalities and reproductive health: Changing priorities in an era of social transformation and globalization(Policy and Research Paper No.16). International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.
15.
DuckerP. F. (1967). The effective decision. Harward Business Review, 45(1), 92–98.
16.
GillR., & StewarD. E. (2012). Relevance of gender-sensitive policies and general health indicators to compare the status of South Asian Women’s Health. Women’s Health Issues, 21(1), 12–18.
17.
GradyW. R., KlepingerD. H., BillyJ. O. G., & CubbinsL. A. (2010). The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception in the US. Journal of Biosocial Science,, 42(3), 307–323.
18.
GreenwellK. F. (1996). Contraceptives method mix menu: Providing healthy choices for women. World Health Statistics Quarterly, 49(2), 88–93.
19.
IyayiF., IgbinomwanhiaR. O., BardiA., & IyayiO. O. (2012). The control of Nigerian women over their sexuality in an era of HIV/AIDS: A study of women in Edo State in Nigeria. International NGO Journal, 6(5), 113–121.
20.
KabirM. A., KhanM. M. H., KabirM., Mohd. MuziburR., & PatwaryM. F. K. (2004). Impact of women status on fertility and contraceptive use in Bangladesh: Evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey. Journal of Family Welfare, 51(1), 1–10.
21.
KangY., O’ DonnellC., & SparksP. (2010). The effect of spousal communication on contraceptive use in central Terai, Nepal. Journal of Patient Educational Counsellors, 81, 402–408.
22.
KritzM. M., & Makinwa-AdebusoyeP. (1999). Determinants of women’s decision-making authority in Nigeria: The ethnic dimension. Sociol Forum, 14(3), 399–424.
23.
KritzM. M., GurakD. T., & FapohundaB. (1992). Socio-cultural and economic determinants of women’s status and fertility among the Yoruba. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.
24.
KuluH. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypothesis re-examined. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 51–87.
25.
Mari BhatP. N. (1996). Contours of fertility decline in India: A district level study based on the 1991 census. In SrinivasanK. (Ed.), Population policy and reproductive health(pp. 96–180). Hindustan Publications.
26.
MuhammadA. (1996). Ethnic fertility differentials in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 35, 733–744.
27.
NaraindasH. (2009). A sacramental theory of childbirth in India. In SelinH. (Ed.), Childbirth across cultures (pp. 95–106). Springer.
28.
NayerI., AkterS. F., HossainS., & LuciR. H. (2004). Acceptance of long-term contraceptive methods and its related factors among the eligible couples in a selected union. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin, 30(1), 31–35.
29.
OgunjuyigbeP. O., & AdeyemiE. O. (2005). Women’s sexual control within conjugal union: Implications for HIV/AIDS infection and control in a metropolitan city. Demographic Research, 12, 29–50.
30.
OgunjuyigbeP. O., OjofeitimiE. O., & LiasuA. (2009). Spousal communication, changes in partner attitude, and contraceptive use among the Yorubas of Southwest Nigeria. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 34(2), 112–116.
31.
OladejiD. (2008). Socio-cultural and norms factors influencing family planning choices among couples in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Olabisi Onabanjo University.
32.
OmejeJ. C., OshiS. N., & OshiD. C. (2011). Does possession of assets increases women’s participation in reproductive decision-making? Perceptions of Nigerian women. Journal of Biosocial Science, 43(1), 101–111.
33.
OyediranK. A. (2004). Poverty and the dynamics of women’s participation in household decision-making in Nigeria, pp. 116–139.
34.
Registration System Statistical Report. (2018). Executive summary, xxvii-xxviii, office of the registrar general & census commissioner, India Ministry of Home Affairs Government Of India, New Delhi. https://censusindia.gov.in/Vital_Statistics/SRS_Report_2018/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf
35.
RibeH., & SchultzT. (1980). Migrant and native fertility at destination in Colombia: Are migrants selected according to their reproductive preferences?Unpublished Monograph.
36.
SaleemA., & PashaG. R. (2008). Women’s reproductive autonomy and barriers to contraceptives use in Pakistan. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 13(1), 83–89.
37.
SpeizerI. S., WhittleL., & CarterM. (2005). Gender relations and reproductive decision making in Honduras. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31(3), 131–139.
38.
UNFPA and IOM (United Nations Population Fund and International Organization for Migration). (2006). Women on the move.UNFPA; IOM.
39.
UpadhyayU. D., & KarasekD. (2012). Women’s empowerment and ideal family size: An examination of DHS empowerment measures in sub-Saharan Africa. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 78–89.
40.
WatkinsS., RutenbergN., & WilkinsonD. (1997). Orderly theories, disorderly women. In JonesG. W.DouglasR. M.CaldwellJ. C., & D'SouzaR. M. (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition. Oxford University Press.
41.
WHO. (2008). Family planning. http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en/
