The study has attempted to measure the Indian practitioners’ expectation gaps about IFRSs convergence. Based on literature, two hypotheses, a conceptual model and a questionnaire, have been formed. Through protocol interviews followed by a pretest, the questionnaire has been tested (reliability and validity) before conducting the online survey. A total of 159 sample responses has been assessed to measure the gaps on four major parameters. For assaying the gaps, the arithmetic and weighted arithmetic mean differences and paired sample t-test have been applied, which have indicated the likely persistence of gaps. The significant statistical results have indicated likely to reject the null hypotheses and it has to conclude that regulatory requirements have influenced in convergence and the Ind AS probably to improve the reporting practices, audit qualities and analysts’ forecasting. Study limitations, practical implications and roadmap for further research have also been indicated.
BhattacharyyaAK. United spirits limited—A case of corporate governance failure?The Business Standard, 20158June, p. 8.
2.
DaskeH, HailL, LeuzC, VerdiR. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. J Account Res. 2008; 46(5):1085–1142.
3.
GhoshTP. IFRSs for finance executives (first edition). New Delhi: Taxmann Publications Pvt. Ltd, 2010.
4.
BraunGP, HaynesCM, LewisTD, TaylorMH. Principles-based vs rules-based accounting standards: The effects of auditee proposed accounting treatment and regulatory enforcement on audit or judgments and confidence. Res Account Regul. 2015; 27(1):45–50.
5.
BhattacharyyaK. India’s adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS): Advantages and challenges. J Commer Manage Thought. 2012; 3(3):475–479.
6.
BhattacharyyaAK. Transition to IFRS not to be delayed. The Business Standard. 2009Aug24, p. 9.
7.
BhattacharyyaAK. Convergence is better than adoption. The Business Standard. 2011June14, p. 11.
8.
HelleinerE, PorterT. Making transnational networks more accountable. Econ, Manage & Financ Mark. 2010; 5(2): 158–173.
9.
BrownP, PreiatoJ, TarcaA. Measuring country differences in enforcement of accounting standards: An audit and enforcement proxy. J Bus Finance Account. 2014; 41(1–2):1–52.
10.
RichardsonAJ, EberleinB. Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. J Bus Ethics. 2011; 98(2):217–245.
11.
LandsmanWR, MaydewEL, ThornockJR. The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. J Account Econ. 2012; 53(1–2):34–54.
12.
VenezianiM, TeodoriC. The International Accounting Standards and Italian non-listed companies: Perception and economic impact. The results of an empirical survey. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association. Rotterdam; 2008, 23–25 April.
13.
YipRWWY, YoungD.Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information comparability?Account Rev.2012. 87(5):1767–1789.
14.
LangM, RaedyJ, WilsonW. Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings?J Account Econ. 2006; 42(1/2):255–283.
15.
HortonJ, SerafeimG, SerafeimI. Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment?Contemp Account Res. 2012; 30(1):388–423.
16.
HussaineyK, MouselliS. Disclosure quality and stock returns in the UK. J Appl Account Res. 2010; 11(2):154–174.
17.
LeuzC, LinsKV, WarnockFE. Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms?Rev Financ Stud. 2009; 23(3):3245–3285.
18.
De GeorgeB, FergusonCB, SpearNA. How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. Account Rev. 2013; 88(2):429–462.
19.
KimJB, LiuX, ZhengL. The impact of mandatory adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. Account Rev. 2012; 87(6):2061–2094.
20.
RamannaK, WattsRL. Evidence on the effects of unverifiable fair-value accounting. 2007. Available from http://ssrn.com/paper¼1012139
21.
KimJB, ShiH. Voluntary IFRS adoption and stock price synchronicity: Do analyst following and institutional infrastructure matter?Working paper. Kowloon Tong: City University of Hong Kong; and Shanghai: Fudan University; 2010.
22.
LiS. Does mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in the European Union reduce the cost of equity capital?Account Rev. 2010; 85(2):607–636.
23.
IatridisG, RouvolisS. The post-adoption effects of the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards in Greece. J Int Account Audit and Taxation. 2010; 19(1):55–65.
24.
LiuC, YaoLJ, HuN, LiuL. The impact of IFRS on accounting quality in a regulated market: An empirical study of China. J Account Audit Finance. 2011; 26(4):659–676.
25.
TheresiaT. The effect of IFRS adoption on income smoothing practices by Indonesian listed firms. J Aku. 2012; XXIV(1):22–37.
26.
HungM, SubramanyamK. Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: The case of Germany. Rev Account Stud. 2007; 12(4):21–48.
27.
ByardD, LiY, YuY. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ information environment. J Account Res. 2011; 49(1):69–96.
28.
ChristensenHB, LeeE, WalkerM. Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption?Manchester Business School Working Paper; 2008.
29.
LeuzC, WysockiP. The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. J Account Res. 2016; 54(2):525–622.
30.
AggarwalS. International financial reporting standards: An Indian perspective: A road map. IOSR J Bus and Magt (IOSR-JBM). 2016; 18(1):1–5.
31.
SharmaS, JoshiM, KansalM. IFRS adoption challenges in developing economies: An Indian perspective. Manage Audit J.2017; 32(4/5):406–426.
32.
Impact of IFRS Adoption on TaxationChart Account. 2012; 61(6):79–84.
33.
ChauhanAA. To study the impact of convergence to IFRS on financial position of a company and challenges faced by company: A case study in India. Global Res Anal. 2013; 2(10):57–58.
34.
MaheswariS. Carve-outs/ins in IFRS-converged Indian Accounting Standards: Recent developments. Chart Account. 2014; 63(6):66–70.
35.
SahooD. Practical approach to Ind AS101-first-time adoption of Indian Accounting Standards. Chart Account. 2016; 64(9):106–114.
36.
TripathiV. Converged Ind AS 103—business combination and treatment of goodwill and bargain purchase. Chart Account. 2014; 62(7):81–87.
37.
SauravS. Adoption of new revenue recognition standard—IFRS 15/Ind AS 115 and its implementation challenges. Chart Account. 2016; 64(10):127–131.
38.
HajirnisA. New formula of revenue recognition likely to change the prescription for pharma industry. Chart Account. 2015; 63(12):90–96.
39.
BhutaniA, KediaA. Consolidated financial statements under Ind AS 110:Implementation issues. Chart Account. 2014; 63(6):71–79.
40.
LeheryK, GodboleA. Impact of IFRS on reported results of companies—A sectoral analysis. Chart Account. 2013. 62(3):74–79.
41.
DhankarRS, GuptaA. Transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or Ind AS in India. Global J Finance Manage. 2014; 6(7):609–614.
42.
BhargavV, ShikhaD. The impact of international financial reporting standards on financial statements and ratios. Int J Manage. 2013; 2(2):1–15.
43.
AchalapathyKV, BhanusrusireeshaP. Impact of IFRS adoption on financial statements of select Indian companies. Osmania J Int Bus Stud. 2015; 10(1):21–33.
44.
ChandrasekharV, KumarDNS. Impact of IFRS on the Financial Statements of select IT Companies of India. Indian J Finance. 2017; 11(5):7–18.
45.
MorrisRD, GraySJ, PickeringJ, AisbittS. Preparers’ perceptions of the costs and benefits of IFRS: Eidence from Australia’s implementation experience. Account Horiz, 2013; 28(1):143–173.
46.
SantosES, PonteV, MapurungaPVR. Mandatory IFRS adoption in Brazil (2010): Index of compliance with disclosure requirements and explanatory factors of firms reporting. Rev Contab & Fin. 2014; 25(65):161–176.
47.
MısırlıoğluIU, TuckerJ, YükseltürkO. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS guarantee compliance?Int J Account. 2013; 48(3):327–363.
48.
ICAIIndian Accounting Standards (Ind AS): An Overview (Revised), Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, India; 2017.
49.
ICAIConcept Paper on Convergence with IFRSs in India, 2006. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, India. P. 5. (Part-I).
DanjouP, WaltonP. The legitimacy of the IASB. Acc Eur. 2012; 9(1):1–15.
52.
ShilNC, DasB, PramanikAK. Harmonization of accounting standards through internationalization. Int Bus Res. 2009; 2(2):194.
53.
ICAIInstitute of Chartered Accountants of India, 2016. Available from www.icai.org/news
54.
ICAIA study on compliance of financial reporting requirements (compiled from the records of Financial Reporting Review Board), 2010.
55.
RudraT, BhattacharjeeD.Does IFRs influence earnings management? Evidence from India. J Manage Res. 2011; 4(1):1–13.
56.
CIMAComplexity, relevance and clarity of corporate reporting: The views of CIMA FTSE 350. 2013. Available from http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/cid_techrep_complexity_
57.
CoxC. How America’s participation in International Financial Reporting Standards was lost. Speech to the 33rd annual SEC and financial reporting institute conference; Pasadena2014, 5 June.
58.
WangYT, XueJ, ChenX. Shall the market distinguish different information after the implementation of the new accounting standard?J Finance Res. 2009; 1:136–150 (in Chinese).
59.
KimY, LiS. The externality effect of accounting standards convergence: Evidence from cross-border information transfers around EU mandatory IFRS adoption. 2011. Working paper. Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara University.
60.
LinS, RiccardiW, WangC. Does accounting quality change following a switch from US GAAP to IFRS? Evidence from Germany. J Account Public Policy. 2012; 31(6):641–657.
61.
De FrancoG, KothariSP, VerdiRS. The benefits of financial statement comparability. J Account Res. 2011; 49(4):895–931.
62.
SinghalS. Convergence to IFRS—Global opportunities beckon Indian chartered accountants. Chart Account. 2016; 65(5):66–70.
63.
RabiK. Existing global opportunities for young Indian CAs in international perspective. Chart Account. 2016; 65(5):63–65.
64.
BhattacharyyaAK. Gap between audit failures and expectation. The Business Standard. 2008April21, p. 9.
65.
ChoiJH, KimJB, ZangY. Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?Audit: J Pract Theo. 2010; 29(2):115–140.
66.
HakimF, OmriMA. Quality of the external auditor, information asymmetry, and bid-ask spread: Case of the listed Tunisian firms. Int J Account and Inf Manage. 2010; 18(1):5–18.
67.
EttredgeML, XuY, YiH. Fair value measurements and audit fees: Evidence from the banking industry. 2011. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1473569orhttps://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2139/ssrn.1473569
68.
LoyeungA, MatolcsyZP, WeberJ, WellsPA. An analysis of the accounting errors that arise during the transition to IFRS. Sydney, Working paper 2011, January.
69.
DeloitteIFRS survey: Where are we today?New York, NY: Deloitte & Touche LLP; 2008.
70.
KPMGInternational Financial Reporting Standards: The quest for a global language. London: KPMG LLP; 2007.
71.
SomaniA. The next big change—Ind AS. Chart Account. 2014; 63(9):77–82.
72.
BaeKH, TanT, WelkerM. International GAAP differences: The impact of foreign analysts. Account Rev. (2008); 83(3):593–628.
73.
TanH, WangS, WelkerM. Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. J Account Res. 2011; 49:1307–1357.
74.
LiX, YangH. Mandatory financial reporting and voluntary disclosure: The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on management forecasts. Account Rev. 2016; 91(3):933–953.
75.
KimJ, ShiH. Voluntary IFRS adoption, analyst coverage, and information quality: International evidence. J Int Account Res. 2012; 11(1):45–76.
76.
CollisJ, HusseyR. Business research (second edition). Palgrave London: Macmillan; 2003.
77.
McDanielCD, GatesRH. Marketing Research Essentials (seventh edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
78.
CrowneDPMarloweD.A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Cons Psychol. 1960; 24(4):349–354.
79.
LeeN, LingsI. Doing Business Research: A guide to theory and practice (first South Asia edition). New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd; 2008.
HayesRS, BakerR. A participant observation study of the resolution of audit engagement challenges in government tax compliance audits. Qual Res Account Manage. 2014; 11(4):416–439.
82.
SaundersM, LewisP, ThornhillA. Research Methods for Business Students (fifth edition). Noida: Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
83.
DiamantopoulosA, ShlegelmilchB. Taking the fear out of data analysis. London: Thomson Learning; 1997.
DillmanDA. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1978.
86.
OberhoferP, DieplingerM. Sustainability in the transport and logistics sector: Lacking environmental measures. Bus Stra Environ. 2014; 23(4):236–253.
87.
IsrealGD. Determining Sample Size. PEOD6, one of a series of the Agricultural Education and Communication Department, UF/IFAS Extension, 2013. Original publication date November1992. [Revised April 2009]. Available from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
88.
LeslieLL. Are high response rates essential to valid survey?Soc Sci Res. 1972; 1(3):323–334.
89.
RoscoeJTFundamentals research statistics for behavioral sciences (second edition). In HillR. (1998). What sample size is enough’ in internet survey research? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st Century; 1975.
90.
WuML. SPSS statistical application practice (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2003.
91.
DiMaggioPJ, PowellWW. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Socio Rev. 1983; 48(2):147–160.
92.
MeyerJW, RowanB. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Socio. 1977; 83(2):340–363.
93.
TuttleB, DillardJ. Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Account Horiz. 2007; 21(4):387–409.
94.
ClasonDL, DormodyTJ. Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. J Agric Educ. 1994; 35(4):31–35.
LiQ. A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Syst Appl. 2013; 40 (5):1609–1618.
97.
LikertR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932; 22(140):1–55.
98.
LosbyJ, WetmoreA. CDC coffee break: Using Likert scales in evaluation survey work. National Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2012. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/docs/cb_february_14_2012.pdf
99.
BethlehemJGRepresentatives of Web Surveys—an Illusion? In StoopI. & WittenbergM. (Eds.), Acc pan onli res, pana or pit? Proceedings of the DANS symposium. 2008; 19–44. Amsterdam: Aksant.
100.
CreswellJW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Education, 2008.
101.
DambrinC, RobsonK. Tracing performance in the pharmaceutical industry: Ambivalence, opacity and the performativity of flawed measures. Acc, Org Soc. 2011; 36(7):428–455.
102.
YapaPWS, JoshiM, KraalD.The socio-economic impacts of the adoption of IFRS: A comparative study between the ASEAN countries of Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, 2011. Available from www.researchgate.net/profile/Mahesh_Joshi11/publication/264854114_The_Socio-Economic_Impacts_of_the_Adoption_of_IFRS_a_comparative_study_between_the_ASEAN_countries_of_Singapore_Malaysia_and_Indonesia/links/543fabd70cf21227a11a6825.pdf
103.
AlbuN, AlbuCN, BuneaS, CaluDA, GirbinaMM. A story about IAS/IFRS implementation in Romania. J Account Emerg Ecos. 2011; 1(1):76–100.
104.
HassanEA, RankinM, LuW. The development of accounting regulation in Iraq and the IFRS adoption decision: An institutional perspective. Int J Account. 2014; 49(3):371–390.
105.
KajüterP, NienhausM. The impact of IFRS 8 adoption on the usefulness of segment reports. Aba: J Account Finance Bus Stud. 2017; 53(1):28–58.
106.
StadlerC, NobesCW. The influence of country, industry, and topic factors on IFRS Policy Choice. Abacus: J Account Finance Bus Stu. 2014; 50(4):386–421.
107.
KumarasiriJ, FisherR. Auditors’ perceptions of fair-value accounting: Developing country evidence. Int J Audit. 2011; 15(1):66–87.
108.
WagenhoferA. Internationale Rechnungslegungs standards —IAS/IFRS (sixth edition). Munich: mi-Wirtschaftsbuch; 2009.
109.
ShortridgeRT, SmithPA. Understanding the changes in accounting thought. Res Account Regul. 2009; 21(1):11–18.
110.
SauravS. Moving towards Fair Value–IFRS13 in Indian perspective. Chart Account. 2014; 62(7):88–91.
111.
ShanYG, TroshaniI. The effect of mandatory XBRL and IFRS adoption on audit fees: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Int J Manage Finance. 2016; 12(2):109–135.
112.
SamahaK, KhlifH. Adoption of and compliance with IFRS in developing countries: A synthesis of theories and directions for future research. J Account Emerg Ecos. 2016; 6(1):33–49.
