Impact of Microfinance on Women Empowerment in the Matrilineal Tribal Society of India: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Difference
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2013
Impact of Microfinance on Women Empowerment in the Matrilineal Tribal Society of India: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-Difference
This study is an evaluation of the impact of microfinance on women empowerment conducted upon clients of the matrilineal tribal society of India that exists in its north east region. It covers a period of five years, where in, data is compiled for 300 microfinance women clients (experimental group [EG]) and 150 non-microfinance women clients (control group [CG)]). For impact evaluation, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Difference-in-Difference (DinD) techniques are applied. PSM ensures a matched sample by balancing the EG and CG on covariates and DinD, the impact of microfinance through economic and sociopolitical outcomes. The study highlights that microfinance has a positive impact on income, expenditure and savings. It led to an improvement in asset structure, increased access to livestock, micro machines, family wealth and family savings, education decision-making, improved mobility, communication skills, voicing of concerns, self confidence, increased political participation to promote gender equality, etc. In addition, microfinance amount and profile of the clients are important components in influencing impact. Overall, microfinance is a potent tool of women empowerment even in matrilineal tribal settings.
AhmedS.M.PetzoldM.KabirZ.N.TomsonG. 2006. ‘Targeted Intervention for the Ultra Poor in Rural Bangladesh: Does it Make any Difference in their Health Seeking Behavior?’, Social Science and Medicine, 63(11): 2899–911.
2.
Asia Pacific Human Development Network (APHDN). 2009. Gender—Overcoming Unequal Power, Unequal Voice. Colombo: UNDP Regional Center for Asia Pacific.
3.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2009. Vanuatu Country Partnership Strategy 2010–2014. Manila: ADB.
4.
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID). 2008. Violence against Women in Melanesia and East Timor—Building on Global and Regional Promising Approaches. Canberra: Government of Australia.
5.
B L Center for Development Research and Action (BLCDRA). 2005. Micro finance and Empowerment of Scheduled Caste Women: An Impact Study of Self-help Groups in Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal. New Delhi: Government of India.
6.
BlumbergR.L.2006. ‘How Mother’s Economic Activities and Empowerment Affect Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) for Boys and Girls: A Theory-guided Exploration Across History, Cultures and Societies’, Background Paper prepared for Education for All Global Monitoring Report, Paris, UNESCO.
ColemanB.E.2006. ‘Microfinance in Northeast Thailand: Who Benefits and How Much?’, World Development, 34(9): 1612–38.
9.
DehejiaR.WahbaS.1999. ‘Causal Effects in Non-experimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programmes’, Journal of American Statistical Association, 94(448): 1053–62.
10.
DeiningerK.LiuY.2009a. Economic and Social Impact of Self-help Groups in India. Washington DC: World Bank.
11.
DeiningerK.LiuY.2009b. Long-term Economic Impact of Self-help Groups in India. Washington DC: World Bank.
12.
Education for All Global Monitoring Report (EFAGMR). 2003/04. Gender and Education for All: The Leap to Equality. Paris: UNESCO.
13.
EichlerM.LechnerM.2002. ‘An Evaluation of Public Employment Programmes in the East German State of Sachsen-Anhalt’, Labour Economics, 9(2): 143–86.
14.
GarikipatiS.2008. ‘The Impact of Lending to Women on Household Vulnerability and Women’s Empowerment: Evidence from India’, World Development, 36(12): 2620–42.
15.
GhalibA.K.MalkiI.ImaiK.S.2012. ‘Microfinance and its Role in Household Poverty Reduction: Findings from Pakistan’, Working Paper 173, Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester. Available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2088196 (last accessed on 25 July 2012).
16.
GrownC.GuptaG.R.KhanZ.2003. ‘Promises to Keep: Achieving Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women’, Background Paper of the Task Force on Education and Gender Equality, Millennium Project, UN Development Group.
17.
HavilandA.NaginD.S.RosenbaumP.R.2007. ‘Combining Propensity Score Matching and Group-based Trajectory Analysis in Observational Study’, Psychological Methods, 12(3): 247–67.
18.
HermesN.LensinkR.2007. ‘Impact of Microfinance: A Critical Survey’, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(6): 462–65.
19.
HiattS.R.WoodworthW.P.2006. ‘Alleviating Poverty through Microfinance: Village Banking Outcomes in Central America’, The Social Science Journal, 43: 471–77.
20.
HiranoK.ImbensG.W.2001. ‘Estimation of Causal Effects Using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart Catheterization’, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3–4): 259–78.
21.
HolvoetN.2005. ‘The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-making Agency: Evidence from South India’, Development and Change, 36(1): 75–102. https://meghalaya.nic.in:8443/megportal/stateprofile (last accessed on 20 June 2012).
22.
Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality (IANWGE). 2006. Indigenous Women and the United Nations System. New York: United Nations.
23.
IslamA.2009. ‘Medium and Long-term Participation in Microfinance: An Evaluation Using a Large Panel Dataset from Bangladesh’. Department of Economics, Monash University, Australia. Available online at https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db _name=FEMES09&paper_id=136 (last accessed on 27 July 2012).
KhandelwalA.K.2007. ‘Microfinance Development Strategy for India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(13): 1127–35.
26.
KrishnaA.2003. ‘Social Capital, Community Driven Development and Empowerment: A Short Note on Concepts and Operations’, Working Paper no. 33077, World Bank.
27.
KroppE.W.SuranB.S.2002. Linking Banks and (financial) Self Help Groups in India. Mumbai: NABARD.
28.
LeachF.SitaramS.2002. ‘Microfinance and Women’s Empowerment: A Lesson from India’, Development in Practice, 12(5): 575–88.
29.
LoveT.E.2003. ‘Propensity Scores: What do they do, How should I use them and Why should I care?’ Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University. Available online at http://www.chrp.org/love/ASACleveland2003Propensity.pdf (last accessed on 15November2009).
30.
LyngdohB.F.PatiA.P.2011. ‘Microfinance and Socio-economic Change: An Assessment of Meghalaya’, The microFINANCE REVIEW, 3(1): 110–22.
31.
MangalaK.P.ChengappaP.G.2008. ‘A Novel Agribusiness Model for Backward Linkages with Farmers: A Case of Food Retail Chain’, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 21: 363–70.
32.
Mauritius Strategy for Implementation (MSI). 2011. Vanuatu National Assessment Report – 5 Year Review of the Mauritius Strategy for Further Implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. Government of Vanuatu.
33.
MayouxL.1999a. ‘Questioning Virtuous Spirals: Microfinance and Women’s Empowerment in Africa’, Journal of International Development, 11(7): 957–84.
MayouxL.HartlM.2009. Gender and Rural Microfinance: Reaching and Empowering Women. Rome: IFAD.
37.
McCaffreyD.F.RidgewayG.MorralA.R.2004. ‘Propensity Score Estimation with Booted Regression for Evaluating Causal Effects in Observational Studies’, Psychological Methods, 9(4): 403–25.
38.
Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI). 2010. Women and Men in India. New Delhi: Government of India.
39.
Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MTA). 2010. Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India. Statistics Division: Government of India.
40.
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD). 2000. Supportive Policy and Regulatory Framework for Micro Finance in India. Mumbai: NABARD.
ParkA.RenC.2001. ‘Microfinance with Chinese Characteristics’, World Development, 29(1): 39–62.
44.
Programme on Women’s Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (PWESCR). 2011. ‘Women’s Productive Resources: Realizing the Right to Food for All’, Discussion Paper, Chennai, India.
45.
RahmanA.1999. ‘Microcredit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays?’, World Development, 27(1): 67–82.
46.
RaoM.G.MukherjeeC.BhasinA.BaruaA.AnandM.PandeyR.SrinivasanR.2011. Vision Document for the State of Meghalaya 2030. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
47.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI). 1999. Report on Micro Credit. Mumbai: Micro Credit Special Cell.
48.
RosenbaumP.R.RubinD.B.1983. ‘The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects’, Biometrika, 70(1): 41–55.
49.
SarinM.2008. Annex 3: Gender Assessment of the North Eastern Region Community Resource Management Project for Upland Areas and the Meghalaya Livelihoods Improvement Project for the Himalayas. Mainstreaming Gender in Mountain Development: From Policy to Practice (pp. 40–49). ICIMOD.
50.
SaxenaN.C.2002. Rural Poverty in Meghalaya: Its Nature, Dimensions and Possible Options. Planning Commission: Government of India.
51.
SetboonsarngS.ParpievZ.2008. ‘Microfinance and the Millennium Development Goals in Pakistan: Impact Assessment Using Propensity Score Matching’, ADB Institute Discussion Paper no. 104, Tokyo. Available online at http://www.khushhalibank.com.pk/resource_center/pdf/article_070508.pdf(last accessed on 27 July 2012).
52.
ShawJ.2004. ‘Microenterprise Occupation and Poverty Reduction in Microfinance Programs: Evidence from Srilanka’, World Development, 32(7): 1247–64.
53.
SinhaF.2005. ‘Access, Use and Contribution of Microfinance in India: Findings from a National Study’, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(17): 1714–19.
54.
SrivastavaP.2005. ‘Micro-finance in India: Odysseus or interloper?’, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(33): 3626–28.
55.
SwainR.B.2006. Microfinance and Women’s Empowerment: Evidence from Self Help Group Bank Linkage Programme in India. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
56.
ThomasA.K.L.HumphriesM.2011. ‘Filling the Empty Signifier with the Rhetoric of Emancipation: Drawing Women into the Market—A Case in Point’, 7th International Critical Management Studies Conference, Naples, Italy.
