Agriculture is the backbone of Indian economy with more than 50 per cent of population been dependent of agriculture for their livelihood. However, low profitability from agriculture, high input cost and seasonality of agriculture produce, fails to make it a sustainable source of livelihood for Indian farmers. The transaction cost theory believes that collective actions can help decrease cost and increase profitability in the sector. Mahila Arthik Vikas Mahamandal (MAVIM) took an initiative to open community managed agro service centers with the objective of providing quality input at a reasonable price.
A qualitative study in two districts i.e. Thane and Yavatmal was conducted. Both primary as well as secondary data was collected for this study. Direct contacts and discussions were held with staff of MAVIM district office, community-managed resource center (CMRCs), agro service centers as well as the beneficiaries.
The study found that the agro-service centers promoted by MAVIM are doing well and being a form of collective, have helped farmer’s in reducing the cost of operation and increasing their bargaining power in the market. The study concludes that with small changes in the design and structure of the intervention, the organization can help them in achieving their objectives.
AnsariShahzadWijenFrankGrayBarbara. 2013. ‘Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”’. Organization Science24 (4): 1014–40.
2.
BachV. H. S.NuppenauEmst-August. 1995. ‘Measuring Inter-dependent Socio-economic Variables Affecting Development and Their Impact on South African Traditional Agriculture’. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture (Germany)34 (3): 259–59.
3.
BaliyanS. P.KgathiD. L.2009. ‘Production and Marketing Problems in Small Scale Horticultural Farming in Botswana’. XVI International Symposium on Horticultural Economics and Management831: 31–40.
4.
BhartiNisha. 2018. ‘Evolution of Agriculture Finance in India: A Historical Perspective’. Agricultural Finance Review78 (3): 376–92. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-05-2017-0035 (accessed on 20 September 2019).
5.
BuadiDonus K.AnamanKwabena A.KwartengJoseph A.2013. ‘Farmers’ Perceptions of the Quality of Extension Services Provided by Non-governmental Organisations in two Municipalities in the Central Region of Ghana’. Agricultural Systems120: 20–26.
6.
ButtelFrederick H.1982. ‘The Political Economy of Part-time Farming’. GeoJournal6 (4): 293–300.
ChandramouliC. and Registrar General. 2011. ‘Census of India 2011’. Provisional Population Totals. New Delhi: Government of India.
9.
CoaseRonald Harry. 1937. ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica4 (16): 386–405.
10.
DuYanqiangRavenscroftNeilWangYanLiuPingyang. 2019. ‘Governance, Gender and the Appropriation of Natural Resources: A Case Study of “Left-Behind” Women’s Collective Action in China’. Society & Natural Resources32 (4): 382–99.
11.
Government of India. 2016–17. Annual Report 2016–17. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture.
12.
Government of Kerala. 2016. Report of Evaluation Study on Agro Service Centers in Kerala. Kerala: Department of Agriculture.
13.
Government of Maharashtra. 2017. Economic Survey of Maharashtra (2016–17). Mumbai: Directorate of Economics and Statistics.
14.
JagweJohn NkaluboMachetheC.2011. ‘Effects of Transaction Costs on Choice of Selling Point: A Case of Smallholder Banana Growers in the Great Lakes Region of Central Africa’. Agrekon50 (3): 109–23.
15.
JainDevaki. 2007. ‘To Be or Not to Be: Problems in Locating Women in Public Policy’. Economic & Political Weekly: 691–96.
16.
JayawantYatin AnilJoshiNikhil. 2018. ‘Modeling Operations of a Custom Hiring Center Using Agent Based Modeling and Discrete Event Simulation’. In International Conference on Complex Systems Design & Management, 13–24. Available at https://link-springer-com-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-02886-2_2 (accessed on 20 September 2019).
17.
KambojParminder. 2012. ‘Study of Farm Machinery Services Provided by Selected Cooperative Societies’. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal14 (4): 123–33.
18.
KulakarniS. D.2009. ‘Mechanization of Agriculture—Indian Scenario’. Proceedings 5th APCAEM TC Meeting & Expert Group Meeting on Application of Agricultural Machinery for Sustainable Agriculture. Philippines. Available at http://www.un-csam.org/ppt/in200910-01-p1.htm (accessed on 20 September 2019).
19.
KyeyamwaHerbertVerbekeWimSpeelmanStijnOpuda-AsiboJohnVan HuylenbroeckGuido. 2008. ‘Structure and dynamics of Livestock Marketing in Rural Uganda: Constraints and Prospects for Research and Development’. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing20 (4): 59–89.doi:10.1080/08974430802355523.
20.
MearnsRobin. 1996. ‘Community, Collective Action and Common Grazing: The Case of Post-socialist Mongolia’. The Journal of Development Studies32 (3): 297–339. doi:10.1080/00220389608422418
21.
MehtaC. R.ChandelN. S.JenaP. C.JhaAnamika. 2019. ‘Indian Agriculture Counting on Farm Mechanization’. AMA—Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America50 (1): 84–89.
22.
OhYoungminLeeIn WonBushCarrie Blanchard. 2014. ‘The Role of Dynamic Social Capital on Economic Development Partnerships Within and Across Communities’. Economic Development Quarterly28 (3): 230–43.
23.
OnwuegbuzieAnthony J.DickinsonWendy B.LeechNancy L.ZoranAnnmarie G.2009. ‘A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods8 (3): 1–21.
24.
PuriM. G.ZagadeP. M.SawantP. A.2008. The Nature and Extent of Service Provided by the Agricultural Consultants. Souvenir and Abstracts, May: 24–25.
25.
RanadeD. H.ChourasiaM. C.ShrivastavaN. K.PatidarD.2006. ‘Improved Tools and Scope for their Custom Hiring in Malwa Region—A Case Study’. Agricultural Engineering Today30 (1–2): 28–31.
26.
RayBiswajitBhattacharyaRabindra N.2011. ‘Transaction Costs, Collective Action and Survival of Heterogeneous Co-management Institutions: Case Study of Forest Management Organisations in West Bengal, India’. The Journal of Development Studies47 (2): 253–73.
27.
RiegeAndreas M., 2003. ‘Validity and Reliability Tests in Case Study Research: A Literature Review with “Hands-on” Applications for Each Research Phase’. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal6 (2): 75–86. Available at https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470055 (accessed on 20 September 2019).
28.
SchutMarcKamandaJoseyGramzowAndreasDuboisThomasStoianDietmarAnderssonJens A.DrorIddoet al2019. ‘Innovation Platforms in Agricultural Research for Development: Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes’. Experimental Agriculture55 (4): 575–96.
29.
VegaDora E. CaríasKeenanRodney J.2016. ‘Situating Community Forestry Enterprises Within New Institutional Economic Theory: What are the Implications for Their Organization’?Journal of Forest Economics25: 1–13.
30.
WangYahuaChenChunliangAraralEduardo. 2016. ‘The Effects of Migration on Collective Action in the Commons: Evidence from Rural China’. World Development88: 79–93.
31.
WilliamsonOliver E.1981. ‘The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach’. American Journal of Sociology87 (3): 548–77.
32.
XieXiangxiangZhangAnluWenLanjiaoBinPeng. 2019. ‘How Horizontal Integration Affects Transaction Costs of Rural Collective Construction Land Market? An Empirical Analysis in Nanhai District, Guangdong Province, China’. Land Use Policy82: 138–46.
33.
Yashoda. (2017). ‘Role of Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society (PACS) in Agricultural Development in India’. Global Journal of Management and Business Research17 (3): 18–122.
