The adoption of gender quotas has increased women’s descriptive representation in local government. However, their formal inclusion does not necessarily translate to substantive authority. This study explores how bureaucratic authority embedded within gendered institutional norms shapes the political agency of women deputy mayors in Nepal’s newly federalized local governments. Based on qualitative data from 15 municipalities and rural municipalities, the findings show that bureaucratic discretion manifested through loyalty to male mayors, informational gatekeeping and gendered narratives of incompetence constrain women’s authority and limit their participation in decision-making processes. Bureaucratic ‘neutrality’ functions less as impartial mediation than as a practice that legitimizes hierarchical alignment and sustains existing power asymmetries. Yet, within these constraints, women deputy mayors mobilize their professional expertise, strategic alliances and procedural engagement to assert their agency and influence decision-making. This study argues that achieving gender equality in local governance depends not only on electoral inclusion but also on reforming the bureaucratic structure through which authority is exercised.
AberbachJ. D., PutnamR. D., & RockmanB. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Harvard University Press.
2.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
3.
AlbertiC., Diaz‐RiosecoD., & ViscontiG. (2022). Gendered bureaucracies: Women mayors and the size and composition of local governments. Governance, 35(3), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12591
4.
AuerbachC., & SilversteinL. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. NYU Press.
5.
BaekgaardM. (2011). The impact of formal organizational structure on politico-administrative interaction: Evidence from a natural experiment. Public Administration, 89(3), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01872.x
6.
BaekgaardM., Blom‐HansenJ., & SerritzlewS. (2022). How politicians see their relationship with top bureaucrats: Revisiting classical images. Governance, 35(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12558
7.
BesleyT., FolkeO., PerssonT., & RickneJ. (2017). Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: Theory and evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review, 107(8), 2204–2242. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160080
8.
BhandariN. R. (2023). Gender norms in local government: How they shape engagement for women leaders in Nepal. Janaki Women Awareness Society.
9.
BhusalT., & AcharyaK. K. (2024). Five years of local democracy in federal Nepal (2017–2022). Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 11(2), e389. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.389
10.
BrownW. (1992). Finding the man in the state. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178212
11.
ChappellL. (2002). Gendering government: Feminist engagement with the state in Australia and Canada. UBC Press.
12.
ChappellL., & WaylenG. (2013). Gender and the hidden life of institutions. Public Administration, 91(3), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02104.x
13.
ChildsS., & KrookM. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x
14.
ChowdhuryF. D. (2013). Women’s participation in local governments in Bangladesh and India. In The impact of women’s political leadership on democracy and development (pp. 64–85). Commonwealth Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14217/9781848591677-6-en
15.
CreswellJ. W., & CreswellJ. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage.
16.
DahlerupD. (2006). The story of the theory of critical mass. Politics & Gender, 2(4), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X0624114X
17.
DahlerupD., & FreidenvallL. (2005). Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674042000324673
18.
EaglyA. H., & KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
19.
Election Commission. (2022). Local level election results 2022. Election Commission of Nepal.
20.
FergusonK. E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Temple University Press.
21.
FranceschetS., & PiscopoJ. M. (2014). Sustaining gendered practices? Power, parties, and elite political networks in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013489379
22.
GiriA. (2024). Women’s political participation in federal Nepal: Achievements and Challenges. Democracy Resource Center Nepal.
23.
GoetzA. M., & HassimS. (Eds.). (2003). No shortcuts to power: African women in politics and policy making (Vol. 3). Zed Books.
24.
Government of Nepal. (2015). Constitution of Nepal 2015.
25.
Government of Nepal. (2017a). Local level election act 2017.
26.
Government of Nepal. (2017b). Local government operation act 2017.
27.
Government of Nepal. (2021). Local government institutional capacity self-assessment guideline, 2021.
28.
GuptaA. K., PoudyalT., & ShresthaS. (2019). Politicians and bureaucrats’ relation in local governance of Nepal. Local Government Quarterly, April–June, 5–24.
29.
GuptaA. K., & SigdelT. S. (2024). Integrating sustainable development goals in local plans: Unlocking practices and challenges of local governments in Nepal. Heliyon, 10(20), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39615
30.
GuptaP., & ChhibberP. (2024). Bureaucratic connections and local development: A study of Palwal district in India. Regional & Federal Studies, 34(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2022.2086864
31.
HayoB., & NeumeierF. (2016). Political leaders’ socioeconomic background and public budget deficits: Evidence from OECD countries. Economics & Politics, 28(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12071
32.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2012). Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. Sage Publications.
33.
HolliM., LuhtakallioE., & RaevaaraE. (2006). Quota trouble: Talking about gender quotas in Finnish local politics. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740600612822
34.
JoshiB. D., GuptaA. K., & BhujelR. (2024). Influence of female deputy mayors in decision-making at local governments of Koshi Province. National Women Commission.
35.
KenneyS. J. (1996). Field essay: New research on gendered political institutions. Political Research Quarterly, 49(2), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299604900211
36.
KrookM. L. (2008). Quota laws for women in politics: Implications for feminist practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(3), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxn017
37.
KrookM. L. (2016). Contesting gender quotas: Dynamics of resistance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1151797
38.
MackayF. (2004). Gender and political representation in the UK: The state of the ‘discipline’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00129.x
39.
MackayF. (2014). Nested newness, institutional innovation, and the gendered limits of change. Politics & Gender, 10(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000415
40.
MatloobT., ShabbirM. S., & SaherN. (2021). Women’s political representation in the local governance of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Review of Economics and Political Science, 6(4), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-12-2019-0164
41.
MeierK., & FunkK. D. (2017). Women and public administration in comparative perspective: The case of representation in Brazilian local governments. Administration & Society, 49(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715626201
42.
MeierP. (2008). A gender gap not closed by quotas: The renegotiation of the public sphere. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740802185650
43.
MouritzenP. E., & SvaraJ. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in western local governments. University of Pittsburgh Press.
44.
NarayanU. (2004). The project of feminist epistemology: Perspectives from a nonwestern feminist. In HardingS. G. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 213–224). Routledge.
45.
National Statistics Office. (2023). National population and housing census 2021: Koshi Provincial report. National Statistics Office.
46.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
47.
OakleyA. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In RobertsH. (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
48.
PatemanC. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford University Press.
49.
PollittC., & BouckaertG. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
50.
PurohitB. (2024). Bureaucratic discretion against female politicians: Evidence from Telangana, India. Working Paper.
51.
PyakurelS., ThapaD., & ThapaA. K. (2025). Elected women’s access to leadership in local governance: An exploration of ward level representation. Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS) and Tewa.
52.
RahmanM. M., & KhanA. R. (2018). Challenges and coping strategies of women leaders at the local level in Bangladesh. Italian Sociological Review, 8(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v8i1.155
53.
RaiS. M. (2003). Mainstreaming gender, democratizing the state. Manchester University Press.
54.
RhodeD. L. (2017). Women and leadership. Oxford University Press.
55.
ShvedovaN. (2005). Obstacles to women’s participation in parliament. In KaramA. (Ed.), Women in parliament: Beyond numbers (2nd ed., pp. 33–50). International IDEA.
56.
StiversC. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
57.
SumbasA. (2020). Gendered local politics: The barriers to women’s representation in Turkey. Democratization, 27(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1706166
58.
TamangS. (2018). ‘They’ve given us the chair, but bound our hands and feet’: Embedding elected female representatives in institutions in Nepal. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 23(2), 309–352.
59.
WaylenG. (2014). Informal institutions, institutional change, and gender equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360
60.
WeberM. (1922). Economy and society. University of California Press.
61.
ZakarR., ZakarM. Z., & HamidN. (2018). Gender mainstreaming in politics: Perspective of female politicians from Pakistan. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2018.1464109
