Social Construction of a Segregated Urban Space and Its Effects on Education

Abstract

While segregation of Dalit habitations is assumed to be a characteristic primarily of the rural, studies indicate that a similar spatial organisation is reproduced in urban spaces as well where large populations, particularly of poor Dalits, continue to live in segregated settlements. This article draws on an exploratory study conducted in one such low-income Dalit neighbourhood in Delhi and examines the different ways in which a socially marginalised community constructs its socio-spatial environment (mahaul) and perceives it as shaping their educational outcomes and at the same time being shaped by these outcomes. These constructions not only reveal how disadvantages in the form of existential struggles and low levels of parental education continue to influence the education of the present generation but also provide insights into their ideas about education, change and mobility.

Keywords

Segregation Dalit education

References

Ainsworth

J. W.

(2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117–152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0038

Bharat Sevak Samaj. (1958). Slums of Old Delhi: Report of the socio-economic survey of the slum dwellers of Old Delhi city. Delhi: Atma Ram and Sons.

Bourdieu

(1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). New York, NY and London: Routledge.

Bourdieu

(1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

Brooks-Gunn

Duncan

G. J.

Klebanov

P. K.

Sealand

(1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395. doi: 10.1086/230268

Census of India. (2011). Individual scheduled caste primary census abstract data and its appendix for NCT of Delhi. Retrieved 30 June 2017, from http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/PCA/SC.html

Ciotti

(2006). In the past we were a bit ‘Chamar’: Education as a self- and community- engineering process in northern India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12(4), 899–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00369.x

Drury

(1993). The iron schoolmaster: Education, employment and the family in India. Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

Dupont

(2004). Socio-spatial differentiation and residential segregation in Delhi: A question of scale? Geoforum, 35(2), 157–175. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.08.003

10.

Firstpost . (2013, October 23). Delhi’s Valmiki community extends support to AAP. Retrieved 1 July 2017, from http://www.firstpost.com/politics/delhis-valmiki-community-extends-support-to-aap-1188985.html

11.

Galster

G. C.

Santiago

A. M.

(2006). What’s the ‘hood got to do with it? Parental perceptions about how neighborhood mechanisms affect their children. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 201–226. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00289.x

12.

Gans

H. J.

(2002). The sociology of space: A use-centered view. City and Community, 1(4), 329–339. doi:10.1111/1540-6040.00027

13.

Gephart

M. A.

(1997). Neighborhoods and communities as contexts for development. In Brooks-Gunn

Duncan

G. J.

Aber

J. L.

(Eds), Neighborhood poverty: Vol. I. Context and consequences for children (pp. 1–43). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

14.

Gorringe

(2006). ‘Establishing territory’: The spatial bases and practices of the DPI. In de Neve

Donner

(Eds), The meaning of the local: Politics of place in urban India (pp. 44–67). London: Routledge.

15.

Green

T. L.

(2015). Places of inequality, places of possibility: Mapping ‘opportunity in geography’ across urban school-communities. Urban Review, 47(4), 717–741.

16.

Harding

Gennetian

Winship

Sanbonmatsu

Kling

(2010). Unpacking neighborhood influences on education outcomes: Setting the stage for future research. In Duncan

Murnane

(Eds), Social Inequality and Educational Disadvantage. Retrieved 24 November 2017, from http://users.nber.org/~kling/unpacking.pdf

17.

Jeffery

(2004). Degrees without freedom: The impact of formal education on Dalit young men in north India. Development and Change, 35(5), 963–986. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00388.x

18.

Jeffery

(2006). Parhai ka mahaul? An educational environment in Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh. In de Neve

Donner

(Eds), The meaning of the local: Politics of place in urban India (pp. 116–140). London: Routledge.

19.

Karlekar

(1982). Poverty and women’s work: A study of sweeper women in Delhi. Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.

20.

Lareau

(2015). Cultural knowledge and social inequality. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1177/0003122414565814

21.

Leventhal

Brooks-Gunn

(2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337.

22.

Lupton

(2003). ‘Neighbourhood effects’: Can we measure them and does it matter? (CASE Paper No. CASE/73). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science.

23.

Marcuse

(2005). Enclaves yes, ghettos no: Segregation and the state. In Varady

D. P.

(Ed.), Desegregating the city: Ghettos, enclaves, and inequality (pp. 15–30). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

24.

Nieuwenhuis

Hooimeijer

van Dorsselaer

Vollebergh

(2013). Neighbourhood effects on school achievement: The mediating effect of parenting and problematic behaviour? Environment and Planning, 45(9), 2135–2153. doi: 10.1068/a45367

25.

Prashad

(2000). Untouchable freedom: A social history of a Dalit community. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

26.

Rana

U. S.

(2017, April 22). Spare a minute for Valmikis whose livelihoods are at stake in MCD polls. Retrieved 1 July 2017, from http://www.news18.com/news/politics/spare-a-minute-for-valmikis-whose-livelihoods-are-at-stake-in-mcd-polls-1380675.html

27.

Rendón

M. G.

(2014). Drop out and ‘disconnected’ young adults: Examining the impact of neighborhood and school contexts. Urban Review, 46(2), 169–196. doi: 10.1007/s11256-013-0251-8

28.

Sharkey

P. T.

(2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 826–846. doi:10.1177/000312240607100506

29.

Singh

Vithayathil

(2012). Spaces of discrimination: Residential segregation in Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(37), 60–66.

30.

Slater

(2013). Your life chances affect where you live: A critique of the ‘cottage industry’ of neighbourhood effects research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 367–387. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01215.x

31.

Smith

Davidson

(2008). Civility and etiquette. In Hall

Hubbard

Short

J. R.

(Eds), The SAGE companion to the city (pp. 231–249). London: SAGE Publications.

32.

Thompson

Russell

Simmons

(2014). Space, place and social exclusion: An ethnographic study of young people outside education and employment. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2013.793793

33.

Velaskar

(2012). Education for liberation: Ambedkar’s thought and Dalit women’s perspectives. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 9(2), 245–271.

34.

Visser

Bolt

van Kempen

(2015). ‘Come and live here and you’ll experience it’: Youths talk about their deprived neighbourhood. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 36–52. Retrieved from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13676261.2014.933196

35.

Vivek

P. S.

(2000). Scavengers: Mumbai’s neglected workers. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(42), 3722–3724. Retrieved 24 November 2017, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4409855