The inclusion of student–teacher research (STR) in initial teacher education (ITE) is a debated concept. In India, STR in ITE remains underexplored in practice and research. Even though STR has been a compulsory part of the curriculum of an innovative 4-year undergraduate ITE, Bachelor of Elementary Education (BElEd) programme, a systematic analysis of this component is still awaited. This study explores the concept of STR in ITE in the Indian context by analysing the STR projects undertaken by BElEd graduates. It examines the nature of inquiry in selected student–teacher projects to understand how STR contributes to teacher development, inquiry skills and knowledge production. The study, conceptualised in the self-study genre of research, has analysed data from the STR reports of 26 BElEd graduates. The findings indicate that the outcomes of the STR projects do not align with the intended vision of preparing the student–teachers to contribute to knowledge-for-practice, as these lack conceptual and methodological rigour. However, STR has its own merit as an idiosyncratic space that allows the student–teachers to explore experiences and ideas, build perspectives and identify theory-practice gaps. The study presents some possibilities opened by STR in ITE.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sports, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
5.
BrooksC. (2021). Research capacity in initial teacher education: Trends in joining the ‘village’. Teaching Education, 32(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1862077
6.
BurnK., & MuttonT. (2015). A review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in Initial Teacher Education. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020104
7.
ButlerB. M., & HortonR. B. (2024). Analyzing methods, data collection, and trustworthiness in self-study research: A content analysis of the first 19 volumes of Studying Teacher Education. Studying Teacher Education, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2024.2367978
8.
ByrneD. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412.
9.
CainT., & HarrisT. (2013). Teachers’ action research in a culture performativity. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 343–358.
10.
CarrW. (2006). Education without theory?British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 136–159.
11.
ChitnisS. (2013). Sociology of education in India: An autobiographical account. In NambissanG. & RaoS. (Eds), Sociology of education in India: Changing contours and emerging concerns (pp. 27–45). Oxford University Press.
12.
ClaytonC., & MeadowsG. (2013). Action research projects in pre-service teacher education. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 20, 5–18.
13.
Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
14.
Cochran-SmithM., & LyteS. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.
15.
Darling-HammondL. (2022). The policy changes we need to get there. The Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 54–57. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/27158588
16.
Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
17.
Darling-HammondL., & LiebermanA. (Eds). (2012). Teacher education around the world: changing policies and practices. Routledge.
18.
DayC. (1990). The development of teachers’ personal practical knowledge through school-based curriculum development projects. In DayC., PopeM., & DenicoloP. (Eds), Insight into teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 213–239). The Falmer Press.
19.
FrommE. (1976). To have or to be. Continuum.
20.
GinsbergR. (2023). Preservice teacher action research: Making meaning and generating knowledge through inquiry. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 16(1), 1–11.
21.
GleesonJ., SugrueC., & O’FlahertyJ. (2017). Research capacity and initial teacher education reform: Irish experiences, international perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 19–29.
22.
GoI. (2012). Vision of teacher education in India: Quality and regulatory perspective (Report of the High-Powered Commission on Teacher Education constituted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India). Ministry of Human Resource Development.
23.
GoI. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education.
24.
HordvikM., FletcherT., HaugenA. L., MollerL., & EngebretsenB. (2021). Using collaborative self-study and rhizomatics to explore the ongoing nature of becoming teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103318
25.
HoweyK. R., & ZimpherN. L. (1999). Pervasive problems and issues in teacher education. Teachers College Record, 100(5), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819910000512
26.
JohannessonP., & OlinA. (2023). Teachers’ action research as a case of social learning: Exploring learning in between research and school practice. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2175253
27.
KatsarouE., & TsafosV. (2013). Student–teachers as researchers: Towards a professional development orientation in teacher education—Possibilities and limitations in the Greek university. Educational Action Research, 21(4), 532–548.
28.
Kowalczuk-WalędziakM., ValeevaR. A., SablićM., & MenterI. (2023). The Palgrave handbook of teacher education in central and eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
KumarS. (2020). Sanskara: The notion of heredity educability and changing behaviour of the teachers. In RainaJ. (Ed.), Elementary education in India: Policy shifts, issues and challenges (pp. 137–153). Routledge.
30.
LabareeD. F. (2003). The peculiar problems of preparing educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 13–22.
31.
LabareeD. F. (2008). The dysfunctional pursuit of relevance in education research. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 421–423.
32.
LaBoskeyV. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In LoughranJ. J., HamiltonM. L., LaBoskeyV. K., & RussellT. (Eds), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Springer.
33.
LoughranJ. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386
34.
MalishC. M. (2023). Are colleges ready for degrees with research?Economic & Political Weekly (Engage), 58(11). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/are-colleges-ready-degrees-research
35.
McNiffJ., & WhiteheadJ. (2005). Action research for teachers: A practical guide. David Fulton Publishers.
36.
MenterI., HulmeM., ElliotD., LewinJ., BaumfieldV., BrittonA., CarrollM., LivingstonK., McCullochM., McQueenI., PatrickF., & TownsendT. (2010). Literature review on teacher education in the 21st century. University of Glasgow.
37.
MuttonT., & BurnK. (2024). Does initial teacher education (in England) have a future?Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2306829
38.
National Council for Teacher Education. (2009). National curriculum framework for teacher education: Towards a humane and professional teacher. NCTE.
39.
National Council for Teacher Education. (2023). National professional standards for teachers. NCTE.
40.
NawaniD. (2023). In search of a better world: Beyond the binaries of action and reflection. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 20(1), 7–16.
41.
NewmanJ. (1909). The rise and progress of universities: Historical sketches. The National Institute for Newman Studies.
42.
NguyenH. (2024). Teaching preservice teachers to do research: an action research study. ELT Journal, 78(3), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccae006
43.
Oolbekkink-MarchandH., OosterheertI., LubberinkL. S., & DenessenE. (2022). The position of student teacher practitioner research in teacher education: Teacher educators’ perspectives. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1857811
44.
PeercyM. M., & TroyanF. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26–36.
45.
PerryE., OwenD., BoothJ. N., & BowerK. (2019). The curriculum for initial teacher education: Literature review. Sheffield Institute of Education, Sheffield Hallam University. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/839656/Literature_Review_of_Initial_Teacher_Education_Curriculum_-_final.pdf
46.
PuustinenM., SänttiJ., KoskiA., & TammiT. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170–179.
47.
RaghavanN. (2015). Reflective teacher: Case studies of action research. Orient Blackswan.
48.
RainaJ. (2022). Teacher education at crossroads in India: Dire need of a new direction. In KhineM. S. & LiuY. (Eds), Handbook of research on teacher education: Innovations and practices in Asia (pp. 755–770). Springer Nature.
49.
SaquipiB., & VogrincJ. (2016). Developing research competence in pre-service teacher education. Pedagoška obzorja-Didactica Slovenica, 31(2), 101–117.
50.
SarangapaniP. M. (2013). Soft disciplines and hard battles. In NambissanG. & RaoS. S. (Eds), Sociology of education in India: Changing contours and emerging concerns (pp. 61–76). Oxford University Press.
51.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
52.
SchuckS., & RussellT. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500288291
53.
SchulzR., & MandzukD. (2005). Learning to teach, learning to inquire: A 3-year study of teacher candidates’ experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(3), 315–331.
54.
SinnemaC., MeyerF., & AitkenG. (2017). Capturing the complex, situated, and active nature of teaching through inquiry-oriented standards for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116668017
55.
SmylieM. A., BayM., & TozerS. E. (1999). Preparing teachers as agents of change. Teachers College Record, 100(5), 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819910000502
56.
StahlN. A., & KingJ. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28. https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/45381095
57.
StembergerT. (2020). Educational research within the curricula of initial teacher education: The case of Slovenia. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(3), 31–51. https://www.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/871
58.
StenhouseL. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heineman.
59.
SubrahmanyamR. (2023, April12). Building institutions of eminence requires more than infrastructure: The path to excellence. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/building-institutions-of-eminence-it-requires-more-than-infrastructure-8551238/
60.
ToqueroC. M. D. (2021). “Real-world:” Preservice teachers’ research competence and research difficulties in action research. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 26–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2019-0060
61.
TsafosV. (2009). Developing a practice-theory model in pre-service teacher education in Greece: The implications of action research—A case study. Action Research, 8(2), 153–170.
62.
University of Delhi. (2001). The Bachelor of Elementary Education: Programme of study. Maulana Azad Centre for Elementary and Social Education, Department of Education, University of Delhi.
63.
Van-KatwijkL., JansenE., & Van VeenK. (2021). Pre-service teacher research: A way to future-proof teachers?European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928070
64.
WhiteheadJ. (2009). Generating living theory and understanding in action research studies. Action Research, 7(1), 85–99.
65.
WhittyG. (2013). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable?British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 159–176. 10.1080/01411920600568919
66.
WinchC., OanceaA., & OrchardJ. (2015). The contribution of educational research to teachers’ professional learning: Philosophical understandings. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017406
67.
XerriD. (2018). Two methodological challenges for teacher–researchers: Reflexivity and trustworthiness. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(1), 37–41.
