The Significance of Tax as a Determinant of Leasing: Evidence from UK Tax changes

Abstract

This paper analyses the significance of corporation tax as one of the factors that influences leasing activities. I use the UK data and employ the Tobit model to test the debatable substitutional relationship between leasing and debt financing. The study also investigates whether there is any industrial influence on the relationship between lease rate and debt ratio. It finally tests the significance of tax as a factor influencing leasing and whether that significance varies across the sectors. The results show that in absence of dummy variable that capture the influence of industry to which the company belongs, debt ratio, size, liquidity and growth variables significantly influence the lease rate and also that lease and debt are substitutes. However, the extent to which debt and lease are substitute varies across the sectors implying that the nature of assets used in the production process has some influence on the leasing activities. The results show further that tax is an important factor influencing the leasing activities and its influence is significant irrespective of the sector to which the company belongs. In general the results suggest that any effort to promote leasing activities should focus on the tax incentives and the availability of debt financing as alternative to leasing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Hardwick

(1998), “Determinants of the Leasing Decision in United Kingdom Listed Companies”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 487–494.

Adedeji

Stapleton

R. C.

(1996), “Leases, Debt and Taxable capacity”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 71–83.

Ang

Peterson

(1984), “The Leasing Puzzle”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, pp. 1055–1065.

Barclay

M.J.

Smith

C.W.

(1995), “The Priority Structure of Corporate Liabilities”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, pp. 899–917.

Bayless

M.E.

Diltz

J.D.

(1988), “Debt capacity, capital leasing and alternative debt instruments”, Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol. 19 (4), pp. 77–86.

Beattie

Goodacre

Thomson

(2000), “Operating leases and the assessment of lease-debt substitutability”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 24, pp. 427–470.

Bedford

(2002), “The importance of company and asset characteristics in the use of leasing finance in the United Kingdom: An investigation”, University of Strathclyde Thesis.

Bond

Denny

Devereux

(1993), “Capital Allowances and the impact of corporate tax on Investments in the UK”, Fiscal Studies, Vol. 14 (2), pp. 1–14.

Bowman

R.G.

(1980), “The Debt Equivalence of Leases: An Empirical Investigation”, Accounting Review, Vol. 55 (2), pp. 237–253.

10.

Brealey

R.A.

Young

C.M.

(1980), “Debt, Taxes and Leasing – A Note”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 35, pp. 1245–1250.

11.

DeAngelo

Masulis

R.W.

(1980), “Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.8, pp. 3–29.

12.

Devereux

, (1988), “Corporation tax: The effect of the 1984 reforms on the incentive to invest”, Fiscal Studies, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 62–79.

13.

Edward

J.S.S.

(1984), “The 1984 corporation tax reform”, Fiscal Studies, Vol. 5 (2), pp. 30–40.

14.

Finucane

T.J.

(1988), “Some Empirical Evidence on the use of Financial Leases,” Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 11 (4), pp. 321–333.

15.

Franks

J.R.

Hodges

S.D.

(1978), “Valuation of Financial Lease Contracts – A note,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33 (2), pp. 657–669.

16.

Klein

Crawford

R.G.

Alchian

A.A.

(1978), “Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 297–326.

17.

Krishnan

V.S.

Moyer

R.C.

(1994), “Bankruptcy Costs and the Financial Leasing Decision”, Financial Management, Vol. 23 (2), pp. 31–42.

18.

Lasfer

M.A.

Levis

(1998), “The Determinants of the Leasing Decision of Small and Large Companies”, European Financial Management, Vol. 4 (2), pp. 159–184.

19.

Lewis

C.M.

Schallheim

J.S.

(1992), “Are Debt and Leases Substitutes?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 27 (4), pp. 497–511.

20.

Marston

Harris

R.S.

(1988), “Substitutability of Leases and Debt in Corporate Capital Structures”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 3, pp. 147–169.

21.

Mayes

D.G.

Nicholas

C.S.

(1988), “The Economic Impacts of Leasing”, Macmillan Press.

22.

Moon

Hodges

(1989), “Implication of the recent tax changes for corporate capital investment”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 16 (1), pp. 25–39.

23.

Myers

S.C

Dill

D.A.

Bautista

A.J.

(1976), “Valuation of Financial Lease Contracts”, Journal of Finance, Vol.31, pp. 799–819.

24.

Narayanaswamy

(1994), “The Debt Equivalence of Leases in the UK: An Empirical Investigation”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 26, pp. 337–351.

25.

Ross

S.A.

Westerfield

R.W.

Jaffe

(1999), “Corporate Finance” Vol. 5, Irwin McGraw-Hill.

26.

Sharpe

S.A.

Nguyen

H.N.

(1995), “Capital Market Imperfections and the Incentive to Lease”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.39, pp. 271–295.

27.

Smith

C.W.

Wakeman

C.M.

(1985), “Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, pp. 895–910.

28.

Statement of Standard Accounting Practice (SSAP) No.21: Accounting for Leases and Hire Purchase Contracts”, ASC-August 1984: United Kingdom, Accounting Standards Committee (ASC).

29.

Budget Statement, 13th March, 1984, London: United Kingdom, HMSO.

30.

Finance Act, 1984, Chapter 43, Part II, London: United Kingdom, HMSO.