Attitude and Perceptual Factors in the Adoption of Computers in a School System

Abstract

The advent of new communication technologies has significantly influenced the direction of diffusion research. Initially, the focus was on adoption with individuals as its units. However, with the increasing importance of new communication technologies, it is now considered the responsibility of organizations. As a result, current research in diffusion is mainly concerned with implementation since the innovation process in organizations is only considered successful if it leads to implementation and possibly institutionalization. This article examines the relationship between the independent variables (teachers’ attitudes towards computers and perceived innovation characteristics) and the dependent variables (teacher satisfaction and utilization). Ten hypotheses were formulated to examine the relationship between the variables. Using regression analysis, seven hypotheses related to perceived innovation characteristics were supported. One hypothesis related to attitudes was also supported. The results demonstrate that the implementation of educational computing was successful. This achievement can be attributed more to the importance of attitudinal and perceptual factors than the prescribed linear approach to the diffusion process in organizations. More specifically, the findings emphasize that the degree of implementation is a critical variable in diffusion research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Khaldi, M.A. and I.M. Al-Jabri . (1998). The Relationship of Attitudes to Computer Utilization: New Evidence from a Developing Nation . Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1): 23–42 .

Bacchus, M.K. (1996). The Role of Teacher Education in Development in South Countries . Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 42(2): 77–86 .

Bransford, L.A. (1988). Communication Technology and the Public Sector: Understanding the Process of Adoption . Telematics and Informatics, 5(4): 431–35 .

Farnhill, D. (1985). A Comparison of Hypnosis and Computer-assisted Biofeedback in Computer Anxiety Reduction . Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnothesis, 13: 31–35 .

Fidler, L.A. and J. D. Johnson . (1984). Communication and Innovation Implementation . Academy of Management Review, 9(4): 704–11 .

Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen . (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions, and Behaviors: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley .

Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education: New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University .

Hartwick, J. and H. Barki . (1994). Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use . Management Science, 40(4): 440–65 .

Rao, S. 1993. Impact of New Technologies in Third World Development: Study of Indian NICNET. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio: Bowling Green State University.

10.

Robey, D. (1979). User Attitudes and Management Information System Use . Academy of Management Journal, 22(3): 527–38 .

11.

Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press .

12.

Rogers, E.M. and F.F. Shoemaker . (1971). Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press .

13.

Swanson, E.B. (1974). Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement . Management Science, 21(2): 178–88 .

14.

Swanson, E.B. (1987). Information Channel Disposition and Use . Decision Sciences, 18(1): 131–45 .

15.

Tornatzky, L.G. and K.J. Klein . (1982). Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-implementation: A Meta-analysis of Findings . Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1): 28–45 .

16.

Zaltman, G. and N. Lin . (1971). On the Nature of Innovations . American Behavioral Scientist, 14(5): 651–73 .