Empire Communications,Inc.

Abstract

The essay examines two specific instances of imperial spectacles: the 1877 imperial durbar in Delhi and the 1911 Pageant of Empire in London. It argues that these spectacles enabled the Empire to incorporate the natives as subjects into the symbolic hierarchies of the Raj, and the English into an imperial sensibility of ownership and shared destiny. It suggests that through these spectacles the power and majesty of the Empire was conveyed to their subjects but also to their own countrymen in the form of an imperial improvisation. In the case of the Delhi durbar imperial improvisation was made possible through the participatory nature of the spectacle where the native princes and aristocrats, by participating in the Durbar, implicitly endorsed it, accepted it as ‘Indian’, and located themselves within the imperial structure. The 1911 Pageant was an aesthetic spectacle that forged a sense of connection, for all English visitors to see themselves as a part of the large ‘British’ imperial family and served the educational purpose of introducing the empire’s possessions.

Keywords

1877 Delhi Durbar 1911 London Pageant spectacle imperial improvisation English identity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apter

(2002). On imperial spectacle: The dialectics of seeing in colonial Nigeria. comparative studies in society and history, 44(3), 564–596.

Bremner

G.A.

(2005). Nation and empire in the government architecture of mid-victorian London: The foreign and India office reconsidered. The Historical Journal, 48(3), 703–42.

Briggs

(1979). The age of improvement, 1783–1867. London and New York: Longman.

Burton

(1996). “Making a spectacle of empire: Indian travellers in fin-de-siècle London.” History Workshop Journal, 42: 126–146.

Cannadine

(2001). Ornamentalism: How the British saw their empire. London: Penguin.

Charlesworth

(2001). Subverting the command of place: Panorama and the romantics. In Kitson

P.J.

(ed.), Placing and Displacing Romanticism. (pp. 129–145). London: Ashgate.

Cohn

B.S.

(1983). Representing authority in Victorian India. In Hobsbawm

Ranger

(eds), The invention of tradition. (pp. 165–209) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coronation Durbar Delhi 1911, Official Directory. (1911). Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing.

Desmond

(1982). The India Museum 1801–1879. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.

10.

Deutsch

J-G.

(2002). Celebrating power in everyday life: the administration of the law and the public sphere in colonial Tanzania, 1890–1914. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 15(1), 93–103.

11.

Frykenberg

R.E.

(1993). The coronation durbar of 1911: Some implications. In Frykenberg

(ed.) Delhi through the ages: Essays in urban history, culture and society. 1986. (pp. 225–246) Delhi: Oxford University Press.

12.

Galperin

W.H.

(1993). The return of the visible in British Romanticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.

13.

Greenblatt

(1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

14.

Hall

(2002). Civilising subjects: Metropole and colony in the English imagination, 1830–1867. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

15.

Haynes

(1990). Imperial ritual in a local setting: The ceremonial order in Seurat. 1890–1939. Modern Asian Studies, 25, pp. 495–511.

16.

Hutchins

(1967). The illusion of permanence: British imperialism in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

17.

Knight

L.A.

(1968). The royal titles act and India. Historical Journal 11.

18.

Landau

P.S.

Kaspin

D.D.

(eds), (2002). Images and empires: Visuality in colonial and postcolonial Africa. Berkeley: California University Press.

19.

Lomas

S.C.

(1911). Festival of empire. Souvenir of the pageant of London. London: Bemrose and Sons.

20.

MacKenzie

J.M.

(1984). Propaganda and Empire: The manipulation of British public opinion, 1880–1960. Manchester: Manchester UP.

21.

MacKenzie

J.M.

(2001). Empire and the global gaze. In MacKenzie

John M.

(ed.), The Victorian vision: Inventing new n. pp. 241–264. London: Victoria and Albert Museum.

22.

Metcalf

T.R.

(1989). An imperial vision: Indian architecture and the Britain’s Raj. London: Faber and Faber.

23.

Nuckolls

C.W.

(1990). The Durbar incident. Modern Asian Studies, 24(3), 529–559.

24.

Ryan

D.S.

(1999). Staging the imperial city: The pageant of London, 1911. In Driver

Gilbert

(eds), Imperial Cities: Landscape, display and identity (pp. 117–135). Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

25.

Smith

(1999). ‘A grand work of noble conception’: The Victoria Memorial and imperial London. In Driver

Gilbert

(eds), Imperial cities: Landscape, display and identity. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 21–39.

26.

Trevithick

(1990). Some structural and sequential aspects of the British imperial assemblages at Delhi: 1877–1911, Modern Asian Studies, 25: 561–578.

27.

Wheeler

(1982). The history of the imperial assemblage at Delhi. New Delhi: R.K.

28.

White

(2010). Imperial spectacles, imperial publics: panoramas in and of Calcutta. The Wordsworth Circle, 41(2), 71–81.