Pooshing the Boundaries of Instagram Influencers: How Mainstream vs. Micro-celebrity Influencers Impact Source Credibility,Parasocial Interaction,and Intent to Follow
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2025
Pooshing the Boundaries of Instagram Influencers: How Mainstream vs. Micro-celebrity Influencers Impact Source Credibility,Parasocial Interaction,and Intent to Follow
Individuals are increasingly turning to health influencers on social media for advice about nutrition, exercise, wellness, and more. This study addressed the impacts of two mechanisms of social influence—source credibility and parasocial interaction—on intent to follow health influencers. An online experiment of 202 participants was conducted to compare a celebrity health influencer and a micro-celebrity health influencer on Instagram. Results showed the micro-influencer had higher source credibility and parasocial interaction. A mediation model detected an indirect relationship between influencer and intent to follow, with parasocial interaction as the mediator. This implies that health communicators who want to increase their social media followers feature down-to-earth influencers who inspire familiarity and desire to learn more about the influencer.
BaranS. J., & DavisD. K. (2021). Mass communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
2.
BocarneaM. C., & BrownW. J. (2007). Celebrity-persona parasocial interaction scale. In ReynoldsR. A., WoodsR., & BakerJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 309–312). Idea Group Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8.ch039
3.
BoermanS. C., & MüllerC. M. (2022). Understanding which cues people use to identify influencer marketing on Instagram: An eye tracking study and experiment. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1986256
4.
BradleyS. (2021, December30). How much money Instagram influencers make. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-instagram-influencers-earn-examples-2021-6
5.
BrakeD. R. (2012). Who do they think they’re talking to? Framings of the audience by social media users. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 6, 1056–1076.
6.
BrevesP., AmrehnJ., HeidenreichA., LiebersN., & SchrammH. (2021). Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. International Journal of Advertising, 40(7), 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1881237
7.
CharonJ. M. (2010). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (10th ed.). Prentice Hall.
8.
ChiuC. L., & HoH.-C. (2023). Impact of celebrity, micro-celebrity, and virtual influencers on Chinese Gen Z’s purchase intention through social media. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231164034
9.
De MeulenaerS., De PelsmackerP., & DensN. (2018). Power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and the effects of source credibility on health risk message compliance. Health Communication, 33, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266573
10.
DixonS. (2023, April11). U.S. Instagram users 2023, by age group. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/398166/us-instagram-user-age-distribution/
11.
DjafarovaE., & TrofimenkoO. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22, 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491
12.
DriessensO. (2013). Celebrity capital: Redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society, 42, 543–560. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s11186-013-9202-3
13.
ElsadaiR. D. S., & EriyaniT. (2022). Relationship between the intensity of Instagram utilisation and the tendency of body dysmorphic disorder in female students. Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 18, 106–109.
14.
FengY., ChenH., & KongQ. (2021). An expert with whom I can identify: The role of narratives in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 40, 972–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1824751
15.
FiskeS., & DupreeC. (2014). Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111, 13593–13597. http://www.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111
16.
FolkvordF., RoesE., & BevelanderK. (2020). Promoting healthy foods in the new digital era on Instagram: An experimental study on the effect of a popular real versus fictitious fit influencer on brand attitude and purchase intentions. BMC Public Health, 20, 1–8. https://doi/org/10.1186/s12889-020-09779-y
17.
FowlerK., & ThomasV. L. (2019). Beyond endorsements: The effect of celebrity creative directors on consumers’ attitudes toward the advertisement. Psychology & Marketing, 36, 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21251
18.
HayesA. F. (2022). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
19.
HolmanS. [@alittlelesstoxic]. (n.d.). Posts [Instagram profile]. Instagram. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/alittlelesstoxic
20.
HovlandC. I., JanisI. L., & KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion in psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
21.
Influencity. (2023). The largest influencer study in the US in 2023. Retrieved from https://influencity.com/resources/studies/the-largest-influencer-study-of-the-united-states-2023/
22.
JahngM. R. (2019). Watching the rich and famous: The cultivation effect of reality television shows and the mediating role of parasocial experiences. Media Practice & Education, 20, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1556544
23.
JinS. A., & PhuaJ. (2014). Following celebrities’ tweets about brands: The impact of Twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers’ source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities. Journal of Advertising, 43, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.827606
24.
JinS. V., MuqaddamA., & RyuE. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579.
25.
JohnstonJ. (2020). Celebrity, Inc.: The self as work in the era of presentational culture online. Celebrity Studies, 11(4), 508–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2020.1834222
Ke YenK., & Soon LiL. (2021). Social network sites usage and idol emulation: Indirect effect of parasocial interaction. Psychological Studies, 66, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-021-00630-x
28.
KlimmtC., HartmassT., & SchrammH. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In BryantJ. & VordererP., Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–313). Erlbaum.
29.
KosenkoK. A., BinderA. R., & HurleyR. (2016). Celebrity influence and identification: A test of the Angelina effect. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064498
30.
KresovichA., & NoarS. M. (2020). The power of celebrity health events: Meta-analysis of the relationship between audience involvement and behavioral intentions. Journal of Health Communication, 25, 510–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1818148
31.
LedbetterA. M., & ReddS. M. (2016). Celebrity credibility on social media: A conditional process analysis of online self-disclosure attitude as a moderator of posting frequency and parasocial interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 80, 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1187286
32.
LenartowiczM., & StrzeleckiA. (2021). Moderate effect of satisfaction on intention to follow business profiles on Instagram. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media, 9, 4–24. https://doi.org/10.54663/2182-9306
33.
LoebW. (2022, February3). Influencer impact on consumers increasing—Facebook has less power. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2022/02/03/influencer-impact-on-consumers-increasing--facebook-has-less-power/?sh=5963746c4bad
34.
LooiJ., KempD., WhiY., & SongG. (2023). Instagram influencers in health communication: Examining the roles of influencer tier and message construal in COVID-19 prevention public service announcements. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 23, 14–32. http://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2140316
35.
McCroskeyJ. C., & TevenJ. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
36.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society (MorrisC. W., Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
37.
MeierA., GilbertA., BörnerS., & PosslerD. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70. 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025
38.
MooreA. (2018, January2). How to build an engaged Instagram community. Tailwind. https://www.tailwindapp.com/blog/5-ways-to-develop-a-killer-community-on-instagram
39.
MunizA. M.Jr., & O’GuinnT. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618
PilgrimK., & Bohnet-JoschkoS. (2019). Selling health and happiness, how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: Mixed methods research. BMC Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7387-8
42.
RahmaniG. (2018). Selena Gomez, lupus and the impact of celebrity health disclosure on public awareness. Lupus, 27, 1045–1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203317742714
RubinA. M., PerseE. M., & PowellR. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
45.
SchimmelpfennigC., & HuntJ. B. (2020). Fifty years of celebrity endorser research: Support for a comprehensive celebrity endorsement strategy framework. Psychology & Marketing, 37, 488–505. http://www.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21315
46.
SchoutenA., JanssenL., & VerspagetM. (2019). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898
47.
SokolovaK., & KefiH. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011.
48.
SponderM., & KhanG. F. (2018). Digital analytics for marketing. Routledge.
49.
StrykerS. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. The Blackburn Press.
50.
SzablaM., & BlommaertJ. (2020). Does context really collapse in social media interaction?Applied Linguistics Review, 11, 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0119
51.
ThielstC. B. (2013). Social media in healthcare: Connect, communicate, collaborate (2nd ed.). Health Administration Press.
52.
TianX. (2017). Embodied versus disembodied information: How online artifacts influence offline interpersonal interactions. Symbolic Interaction, 40, 190–211. http://www.doi.org/10.1002/SYMB.278
53.
TwerskyC. (2022, September7). You’ll never guess which Kardashian-Jenner is the richest. Seventeen. https://www.seventeen.com/celebrity/g29247362/who-is-the-richest-kardashian/
54.
UsherB. (2018). Rethinking microcelebrity: Key points in practice, performance and purpose. Celebrity Studies, 11(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2018.1536558
55.
van DrielL., & DumitricaD. (2021). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27, 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136
56.
WalterN., CohenJ., NabiR. L., & SaucierC. J. (2022). Making it real: The role of parasocial relationships in enhancing perceived susceptibility and COVID-19 protective behavior. Media Psychology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.2025110
57.
Yu-HaoL., ChienWen Yuan, & WohnD. Y. (2021). How video streamers’ mental health disclosures affect viewers’ risk perceptions. Health Communication, 36, 1931–1941. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1808405
