Discoveries in modern science have contributed immensely to the giant strides taken by humanity in subduing nature. At the same time, it has managed to discover new sinews of power to inflict irreparable damage to opponents, dissenters, and outliers in the realm of politics. The scientific revolution that led to the splitting up of atoms also resulted in the evolution of the atomic bomb. It was the ultimate expression of power maximization which lay latent in human beings. The article attempts to locate the presence of the ‘bomb’ in South Asia which stands in stark contrast to the neorealist logic of capability maximization in response to the anarchy at the ‘structural’ level. In other words, the article will attempt to trace the genealogy of the bomb and try to establish the endogenous origins of the ‘bomb’. Endogenous origins would imply anomalies at the ideational level, psychological scars, and the threat posed by the dominant ‘other’, culminating in the making of the nuclear bomb. Second, the article will seek to explore the debate between nuclear ‘optimists’ and ‘pessimists’ and contextualize it in South Asia. Lastly, the article would make a normative case for ‘human security’ as against ceaseless pursuit of ‘ontological security’ by both India and Pakistan.
Basrur, R.2009. South Asia’s Cold War: Nuclear Weapons and Conflict in Comparative Perspective. Routledge: Oxon.
8.
Bidwai, P. and Vanaik, A.2002. South Asia on a Short Fuse: Nuclear Politics and the Future of Global Strategic Disarmament. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
Blarel, N.2012. ‘Nuclear Weapons in South Asia: Theoretical Implications’, in S.D.Bansal, ed., South Asian Security: 21st Century Discourses (pp. 47–64). Oxon: Routledge.
Bracken, P.2013. The Second Nuclear Age: Strategy, Danger, and the New Power Politics. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
12.
Bruggeman, W.2008. ‘Falling Global Justice and Human Security’, in M.D.Wilde, ed., The Viability of Human Security (pp. 47–70). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
13.
Buzan, B.2007. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Colchester, United Kingdom: ECPR Press.
14.
Chakma, B.2015. South Asia’s Nuclear Security. Oxon: Routledge.
15.
Cohen, S.P.2013. ‘The World View of India’s Strategic Elite’, in K.P.Pant, ed., India’s Foreign Policy: A Reader (pp. 51–81). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
16.
Crawford, N.C.2011. ‘Human Nature and World Politics: Rethinking “Man”’, in K.Booth, ed., Realism and World Politics (pp. 158–176). Oxon: Routledge.
17.
Dadi, I.2010. ‘Nuclearization and Pakistani Popular Culture since 1998’, in I.Abraham, ed., South Asian Cultures of the Bomb: Atomic Publics and the State in India and Pakistan (pp. 173–194). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
18.
Datta, R.2010. Human Security in India and Pakistan in the Twenty-first Century. Plymouth: Pentagon Press.
19.
den Boer, M. and J.de Wilde. 2008. ‘Top-down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Human Security’, in M.den Boer and M.de Wilde, eds, The Viability of Human Security (pp. 9–20). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
20.
Deudney, D.2011. ‘Anarchy and Violence Interdependence’, in K.Booth, ed., Realism and World Politics (pp. 17–34). Oxon: Routledge.
21.
Deudney, D. and G.J.Ikenberry. 1996. Structural Liberalism: The Nature and Sources of the Postwar Western Political Order. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
Dutt, S.2012. ‘Human Security in South Asia and the Role of the UN and its Agencies’, in S.D.Bansal, ed., South Asian Security: 21st Century Discourses (pp. 195–217). Oxon: Routledge.
23.
Ebinger, C.K.1981. Pakistan Energy Planning in a Strategic Vortex. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24.
Ganguly, S.1986. The Origins of War in SouthAsia: The Indo-Pakistani Conflict since 1947. Boulder, CO: West View Press.
25.
Ganguly, S. and S.P.Kapur. 2010. India, Pakistan and the Bomb: Debating Nuclear Stability in South Asia. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
26.
Gat, A.2005. ‘The Democratic Peace Theory Reframed: The Impact of Modernity’, World Politics, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 73–100.
Hoernlé, R.F.1918. ‘Neo-realism and Religion’, The Harvard Theological Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 145–170.
30.
Hoodbhoy, P.1998. ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Future’, in S.A.Cortright, ed., Pakistan and the Bomb: Public Opinion and Nuclear Options (pp. 70–74). Notre dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
31.
Hoyt, T.2009. ‘Kargil: The Nuclear Dimension’, in P.Lavoy, ed., Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia: The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict (pp. 144–167). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Kapur, S. Paul. (2008). Dangerous Deterrent: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation and Conflict in South Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
Krepon, M.2003. ‘Is Cold War Experience Applicable to South Asia?’, in M.K.Gagne, ed., Nuclear Risk Reduction in South Asia (pp. 15–27). New Delhi: Vision Books.
34.
Lavoy, P.R.1994. ‘Civil–Military Relations, Strategic Conduct, and the Stability of Nuclear Deterrence in South Asia’, in S.D.Sagan, ed., Civil–Military Relations and Nuclear Weapons (pp. 79–110). Stanford, California: Stanford Center for International Security and Arms Control.
35.
Lebow, R.N. and J.G.Stein. 1989. ‘Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter’, World Politics, pp. 208–224.
36.
Mallavarapu, S.2007. Banning the Bomb: The Politics of Norm Creation. New Delhi: Pearson Longman.
Noor, S.2007. ‘Pakistan–India Relations and Terrorism’, Pakistan Horizon, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 65–84.
44.
O’Neill, B.2006, May. Nuclear Weapons and the Pursuit of Prestige. California, Berkeley: University of California.
45.
Paul, T.2013. ‘Why Has the India-Pakistan Rivalry Been so Enduring? Power Asymmetry and an Intractable Conflict’, in K.P.Pant, ed., India’s Foreign Policy: A Reader (pp. 213–247). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
46.
Phalkey, J.2013. Atomic State: Big Science in Twentieth-century India. Ranikhet: Permanent Black.
Rosenau, J.N. and Durfee, M.2000. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
50.
Roy, N.2011. A Study of Deviant Sate Behaviour: Indian Foreign Policy, 1947–1962. Ottawa: Heritage Branch.
51.
Sagan, S.D. and Waltz, K.N.2013. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: An Enduring Debate. New York: W.W. Norton.
52.
Salik, N.2010. The Genesis of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence: Pakistan’s Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
53.
Santana, A. H.2009. ‘Nuclear Weapons as the Currency of Power: Deconstructing the Fetishism of Force’, Nonproliferation Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 325–345.
54.
Schelling, T.C. (2008). The Strategy of Conflict. New Delhi: Viva Books.
55.
Sidhu, W.P.2007. ‘Operation Vijay and Operation Parakram: The Victory of Theory?’, in E.Sridharan, ed., The India–Pakistan Nuclear Relationship: Theories of Deterrence and International Relations (pp. 208–238). New Delhi: Routledge.
56.
Sorensen, G.2011. ‘Big and Important Things in IR: Structural Realism and the Neglect of Changes in Statehood’, in K.Booth, ed., Realism and World Politics (pp. 107–123). Oxon: Routledge.
57.
Steele, B.J.2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-identity and the IR state. Oxon: Routledge.
58.
Thakur, R.2015. Nuclear Weapons and International Security: Collected Essays. Oxon: Routledge.
59.
Vanaik, A.2015. After the Bomb. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
60.
Varshney, A.1991. ‘India, Pakistan, and Kashmir: Antinomies of Nationalism’, Asian Survey, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 997–1019.
61.
Vivekanandan, J.2011. Interrogating International Relations: India’s Strategic Practice and the Return of History. New Delhi: Routledge.
62.
Waltz, K.1979. Theory of International Politics. Philippines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
63.
Wendt, A.2013. Social Theory of International Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Winnacker, R.A.1947. ‘The Debate Around Hiroshima’, Military Affairs, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25–30.
65.
Wolpert, S. (2010). India and Pakistan: Continued Conflict or Cooperation?Los Angeles: University of California Press.
