The present article studies the impact of migration to the construction sector on rural poverty in India based on field survey. The survey has been carried out in two phases, the first phase involving the survey of construction workers in National Capital Region and the second phase comparing the well-being of migrant households with non migrant households in selected source villages. The study finds that at destination, workers have poor living and working conditions, lack citizenship rights, entitlements and voice. However, at the cost of hardship, low consumption levels, and possibly a smaller working life span, they manage to save a good portion of their income which they remit or take back home. At origin, migrant households report higher expenditure on consumption, residential housing, and children’s education, as well as some other assets. These differences are a result of higher employment and wage incomes among migrants. However, we were not able to control for differences in initial conditions, and life cycle and other issues, which influence both participation in migration, as well as long-term impacts.
DeshingkarP., & SandiM. (2011, December6–7). Migration and human development in India—New challenges and opportunities. National Workshop on Internal Migration and Human Development in India, Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi, India.
2.
DeshingkarP., & ShaheenA. (2009). Migration and human development in India: Human development (Research Paper). New York: United Nations Development Programme.
3.
KrishnaiahM. (1997). Rural migrant labour systems in semi-arid areas: A study of two villages in Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 40(1), 123–143.
4.
KunduA. (2009). Urbanisation and migration: An analysis of trends, patterns and policies in Asia(Human Development Research Paper No. 16). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report.
5.
MosseD., GuptaS., MehtaM., ShahV., ReesJ., & KRIBP Team (2002). Brokered livelihoods: Debts, labour migration and development in tribal western India. Journal of Development Studies, 38(5), 59–88.
6.
National Commission for Rural Labour (NCRL). (1991). Report of the National Commission on Rural Labour (NCRL Report). Ministry of Labour, Government of India, New Delhi.
7.
National Statistical Commission. (2012). Report of the Committee on Unorganized Sector Statistics. Government of India.
8.
OberaiA.S., & SinghM.H.K. (1983). Causes and consequences of internal migration: A study in the Indian Punjab. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
RBI. (2012). Handbook of statistics on the Indian economy 2011–12. Reserve bank of India. Retrieved from www.rbi.org.in/scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Handbook%200f%20Statistics%20on%20Indian
10.
RogalyBen, BiswasJ., DanielC., AbdurR., KumarR., & SenguptaA. (2001). Seasonal migration, social change and migrant rights, lessons from West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(49), 4547–4558.
11.
RogalyB., CoppardD., RafiqueA., RanaK., SenguptaA. & BiswasJ. (2002). Seasonal migration and welfare/illfare in eastern India: A social analysis. Journal of Development Studies, Special issue on Labour Mobility and Rural Society, 38(5), 89–114.
12.
SharmaA.N. (1997). People on the move: Nature and implication of migrations in a backward economy. Delhi: Vikas.
13.
Smita & Panjiar, Prashant. (2007). Locked homes, empty schools: The impact of distress seasonal migration on the rural poor. New Delhi: Zubaan.
14.
SoundararajanVidhya. (2013). Construction workers—Amending the law for more safety. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(23).
15.
SrivastavaR. (1999). People’s own perception and assessment of poverty. In ChellaiahRaja J. & SudershanR. (Eds), Income poverty and beyond: Human development in India (Chapter 8, pp. 172–192). New Delhi: Social Science Press (initially contributed as background paper to the South Asia Poverty Monitor: India Country Report, United Nations Development Programme, New Delhi, 1997).
16.
SrivastavaR. (2004). Bonded labour in India: Its incidence and pattern, an update based on recent evidence. Prepared for the International Labour Organization, Geneva.
17.
SrivastavaR. (2009b). Economic geography and development: Some observations on India’s experience. Annual conference of the Indian Economic Association, Bhubaneswar, Invited Keynote Paper.
18.
SrivastavaR. (2011a). Internal migration in India: An overview of its features, trends, and policy challenges. New Delhi: UNESCO, Social and Human Sciences Sector & UNICEF.
19.
SrivastavaR. (2011b). Labour migration in India: Recent trends, patterns and policy issues. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 54(3), 411–440.
20.
SrivastavaR. (2012). Changing employment conditions of the Indian workforce and implications for decent work. Global Labour Journal, 3(1), 63–90.
21.
SrivastavaR., & DasguptaR. (2010). Small steps, large beginnings. New Delhi: The America India Foundation.
22.
SrivastavaR., & SasikumarS.K. (2005). An overview of migration in India, its impacts and key issues. In SiddiquiTasneem (Ed.), Migration and development: Pro-poor policy choices (pp. 157–216). Dhaka: The University Press.
23.
SrivastavaR., & SutradharR. (2016). Impact of labour migration to the construction sector on poverty (Occasional Paper). New Delhi: Institute for Human Development.
24.
StandingG. (1985). Circulation and the labour process. In StandingG. (Ed.), Labour circulation and the labour process (pp. 1–45). London: Croom Helm.
25.
The Economic Times. (2011). Rs. 32-a-day poverty line had plan panel in controversy. Retrieved 9June2013, from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-12-31/news/30576678_1_capita-per-day-poverty-rs-32-a-day-poverty-line
