This article argues that the Indian state can develop the capacity to deliver economic rights in a citizen-friendly way, despite serious challenges posed by patronage politics and clientelism. Clientelistic politics reveals why the Indian state fails to deliver the basic rights such as the right to work, health and education. We argue that the ability of the state to deliver owes a lot to bureaucratic puzzling and political powering over developmental ideas in a path-dependent way. We combine powering and puzzling within the state to argue the case for how these ideas tip after they have gained a fair amount of traction within the state. We test the powering and puzzling leading to a tipping point model on the implementation of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) in undivided Andhra Pradesh (AP). How and why did undivided AP develop the capacity to make reach employment to the rural poor, when many other states failed to implement the right to work in India?
AcemogluD., & RobinsonJ. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. London: Profile Books.
2.
AhluwaliaD. (1993). Public distribution of food in India: Coverage, targeting and leakages. Food Policy, 18(1), 33–54.
3.
AiyarS. S., NarayanA. D., & RajuK. (2007). Empowerment through self-help groups. In ArayanD. & GlinskayaE. (Eds.), Ending poverty in South Asia: Ideas that work (pp. 104–135). Washington, DC: World Bank.
4.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5.
BalasubramanyamV. N., & BalasubramanyamA. (2012). Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh: The disparate twins. In PushpangadanK. & BalasubramanyamV. N. (Eds.), Growth, development, and diversity: India’s record since liberalization (pp. 23–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BardhanP. K. (1984). The political economy of development in India. Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
BernstorffD. (1973). Eclipse of “Reddy-Raj”? The attempted restructuring of the Congress Party leadership in Andhra Pradesh. Asian Survey, 13(10), 959–979.
8.
BlythM. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CapocciaG., & KelemenR. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369.
10.
ChandraK. (2007). Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic head counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CorbridgeS., HarrissJ., & JeffreyC. (2013). India Today: Economy, politics and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
CorbridgeS., WilliamsG., SrivastavaM., & VéronR. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DasD. (2015). Hyderabad: Visioning, restructuring and making of a high-tech city. Cities, 43, 48–58.
14.
DavidP. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
15.
DrezeJ. (2010). Employment guarantee and the right to work. In JayalN. G. & MehtaP. B. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 510–520). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
16.
DuttaB., & RamaswamiB. (2001). Targeting and efficiency in the public distribution system: Case of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(18), 1524–1532.
17.
EcksteinH. (1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In GreensteinI. & PolsbyN. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science: Scope and theory (pp. 79–138). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
ElliottC. (2011). Moving from clientelist politics toward a welfare regime: Evidence from the 2009 assembly election in Andhra Pradesh. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(1), 48–79.
19.
ElliottC. (2016). Clientelism and the democratic deficit. Studies in Indian Politics, 4(1), 22–36.
20.
GouldS. J., & EldredgeN. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151.
21.
HackerJ. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of U.S. welfare state retrenchment. In StreeckW. & ThelenK. (Eds.), Continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HaggardS., & MaxfieldS. (1996). The political economy of financial internationalization in the developing world. International Organization, 50(1), 35–68.
23.
HallP. A. (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HallP. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
25.
HarrisonS. S. (1956). Caste and the Andhra communists. American Political Science Review, 50(2), 378–404.
26.
HarshM. (2004). Towards peace, democracy and justice: Committee of concerned citizens. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(12), 1206–1208.
27.
HecloH. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
28.
HickenA. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310.
29.
HirschmanA. O. (1989). How the Keynesian Revolution was exported from the United States, and other comments. In HallP. A. (Ed.), The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations (pp. 347–360). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
IlaiahK. (1992). Andhra Pradesh’s anti-liquor movement. Economic and Political Weekly, 27(45), 2406–2408.
31.
ImbertC., & PappJ. (2015). Labor market effects of social programs: Evidence from India’s employment guarantee. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 233–263.
32.
IndrakanthS. (1997). Coverage and leakages in PDS in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(19), 999–1001.
33.
JaffrelotC. (2010). The rise of the other backward classes in the Hindi belt. The Journal of Asian Studies, 59(1), 86–108.
34.
JhaH. (2018). State processes, ideas, and institutional change: The case of the Right to Information Act in India. Pacific Affairs, 91(2), 309–328.
35.
JhaR., GaihaR., & ShankarS. (2010). National rural employment guarantee programme in Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan: Some recent evidence. Contemporary South Asia, 18(2), 205–213.
36.
KavirajS. (1997). A critique of the passive revolution. In ChatterjeeP. (Ed.), State and politics in India (pp. 45–88). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
37.
KennedyL. (2007). Regional industrial policies driving peri-urban dynamics in Hyderabad, India. Cities, 24(2), 95–109.
38.
KirkJ. (2011). India and the World Bank: The politics of aid and influence. London: Anthem Press.
39.
KlonnerS., & OldigesC. (2014). Safety net for India’s poor or waste of public funds? Poverty and welfare in the wake of the world’s largest job guarantee program. University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/16875/1/Klonner_Oldiges_2014_dp564.pdf
40.
KohliA. (1987). The state and poverty in India: The politics of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KohliA. (1988). The NTR phenomenon in Andhra Pradesh: Political change in a South Indian state. Asian Survey, 28(10), 991–1017.
42.
KothariR. (1964). The Congress system in India. Asian Survey, 14(12), 1161–1173.
43.
KrasnerS. D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223–246.
44.
KudaisyaM. M. (2002). ‘Reforms by stealth’: Indian economic policy, big business and the promise of the Shastri years, 1964–1966. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 25(2), 205–229.
45.
LalithaD. (1997). The role of non tax revenue in financing economic development of Andhra Pradesh 1980–1992. Sri Krishnadevaraya University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10603/62925
46.
MaioranoD. (2014). The politics of the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act in Andhra Pradesh. World Development, 58, 95–105.
47.
ManglaA. (2018). Elite strategies and incremental policy change: The expansion of primary education in India. Governance, 31(2), 381–399.
48.
MarkussenT. (2011). Inequality and political clientelism: Evidence from South India. Journal of Development Studies, 47(11), 1721–1738.
49.
MukherjiR. (2013). Ideas, interests, and the tipping point: Economic change in India. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 363–389.
50.
MukherjiR. (2014a). Globalization and deregulation: Ideas, interests, and institutional change in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
51.
MukherjiR. (2014b). Political economy of reforms in India. InOxford India short introductions (Chapter XXIII, p. 200). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
52.
MukherjiR., & JhaH. (2017). Bureaucratic rationality, political will, and state capacity. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(49), 53–60.
53.
MuraliK. (2017). Caste, class and capital: The social and political origins of economic policy in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
MuralidharanK., NiehausP., & SukhtankarS. (2016). Building state capacity: Evidence from biometric smartcards in India. American Economic Review, 106(10), 2895–2929.
55.
NaseemullahA. (2016). The contested capacity of the Indian state. India Review, 15(4), 407–432.
56.
OlsenW. K. (1989). Eat now pay later: Impact of rice subsidy scheme. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(28), 1597–1611.
57.
OyeK. A. (1985). Explaining cooperation under anarchy: Hypotheses and strategies. World Politics, 38(1), 1–24.
58.
PiersonP. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
59.
PiersonP. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
PiersonP., & SkocpolT. (2002). Historical institutions in contemporary political science. In KatznelsonI. & MilnerH. V. (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline (pp. 703–704). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
61.
RadhakrishnaR., SubbaraoK., IndrakantS., & RaviC. (1997). India’s public distribution system: A national and international perspective (World Bank Discussion Paper). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
62.
RaoK. V. N. (1994). N. T. Rama Rao in power in Andhra Pradesh 1983–1989: A review. In ReddiA. E. & RamD. S. (Eds.), State politics in India: Reflection on Andhra Pradesh (pp. 75–115). New Delhi: MD Publication.
63.
RaoR. S. (2005). Fiscal reforms and finances of government of Andhra Pradesh. New Delhi: The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP)
64.
RattaiahG. P. (2012). Organisations processes and changing power relations: A study of UNDP aided project area Kurnool DT, AP. University of Hyderabad. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10603/105301
65.
ReddiA. R. (1994). From Neelam Sanjiva Reddy to Nedurumalli Janardhana Reddy (a study of party politics in Andhra Pradesh). In ReddiA. E. & RamD. S. (Eds.), State politics in India: Reflection on Andhra Pradesh (pp. 191–207). New Delhi: MD Publication.
66.
RudolphS. H., & RudolphL. I. (2008). Congress learns to lose: From a one-party dominant to a multiparty system in India. In WonJ. & FriedmanE. (Eds.), Political transitions in dominant party systems (pp. 31–57). London: Routledge.
67.
SankaranS. R. (1996). Introduction. In YugandharB. N. (Ed.), Land reforms in India, Andhra Pradesh: People’s pressure and administrative innovations (pp. 17–27). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
68.
SarmaE. A. S. (2010). Sankaran S. R.: In memoriam. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(43), 25–27.
69.
SimmonsB. A., & ElkinsZ. (2003). Globalization and policy diffusion: Explaining three decades of liberalization. In KahlerM. & LakeD. A. (Eds.), Governance in a global economy: Political authority in transition (pp. 171–189). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
SitapatiV. (2016). Half-lion: How PV Narasimha Rao transformed India. New Delhi: Penguin.
71.
SrinivasuluK. (2002). Caste, class, and social articulation in Andhra Pradesh: Mapping differential regional trajectories (Working Paper No. 179). London: Overseas Development Institute.
72.
SrinivasuluK. (2004). Political articulation and policy discourse in elections: Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(34), 3845–3853.
73.
StepanA. C., LinzJ. J., & YadavY. K. (2011). Crafting state-nations: India and other multinational democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
74.
StreeckW., & ThelenK. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In StreeckW. & ThelenK. (Eds.), Continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
SubbaraoK. (1992). Interventions to fill nutrition gaps at the household-level: A review of India’s experience. In HarrisB., GuhanS., & CassenR. H. (Eds.), Poverty in India: Research and policy (pp. 231–258). Mumbai: Oxford University Press.
76.
SuriK. C. (2004). Telugu Desam Party: Rise and prospects for future. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(14/15), 1481–1490.
77.
SuriK. C., & RaghavuluC. V. (1996). Agrarian movements and land reforms. In YugandharB. N. & DattaP. S. (Eds.), Land reforms in India: Andhra Pradesh people’s pressure and administrative, innovations (pp. 28–56). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
78.
SwamyA. (2010). Political mobilization. In JayalN. G. & MehtaP. B. (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 268–287). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
79.
TankhaA. (2012). Banking on self-help groups: Twenty years on. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
80.
TummalaK. K. (1986). Democracy triumphant in India: The case of Andhra Pradesh. Asian Survey, 26(3), 378–395.
81.
UNDP (2003). Assessment of micro-macro linkages in poverty alleviation: South Asia. United Nations Development Programme Evaluation Office. Retrieved from http://web.undp.org/evaluation/evaluations/documents/MicroMacro_SouthAsia.pdf
82.
VarshneyA. (2007). Mass politics or elite politics? Understanding the politics of India’s economic reforms. In MukherjiR. (Ed.), India’s economic transition: The politics of reforms (pp. 146–169). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
83.
WantchekonL. (2003). Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics, 55(3), 399–422.
84.
WilkinsonS. I. (2007). Explaining changing patterns of party–voter linkages in India. In KitscheltH. & WilkinsonS. I. (Eds.), Patrons, clients and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition (pp. 110–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
WitsoeJ. (2013). Democracy against development: Lower-caste politics and political modernity in postcolonial India. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
