This article empirically investigates the impact of corporate governance attributes on companies’ decision to disclose environmental information since corporate governance ensures fair, responsible, credible and transparent corporate behaviours to its stakeholders. The corporate governance attributes used in the study are board size, chief executive officer duality, domestic institutional ownership and foreign institutional ownership. Environmental disclosures are measured by a checklist of items based on Global Reporting Initiative guidelines as well as environmental regulations prevailing in India. Disclosure scores are drawn individually by using content analysis of annual reports for a sample of 177 most polluting companies in India for a period of 6 years, that is, from 2009–2010 to 2014–2015. Employing panel data regression model, the result indicates that foreign institutional ownership is the most important corporate governance attribute that engages corporates in environmental disclosure behaviour. In addition to this, firm-specific characteristics such as company size and environmental certification are more likely to influence environmental disclosures. For better environmental disclosure, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) should mandate all the companies to disclose detailed monetary and non-monetary information on environmental issues in their companies’ periodic report and also more emphasis should be given to strengthen the corporate governance attributes.
AhmadN. N.MohamadN. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and environmental management. Retrieved 21 January 2014, from www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.1322/pdf
2.
AndrikopoulosA.KriklaniN. (2013). Environmental disclosure and financial characteristics of the firm: The case of Denmark. Corporate Social Resonsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 55–64.
3.
BarakoD. G.HancockP.IzanH. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125.
4.
BewleyK.LiY. (2000). Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 1, 201–226.
5.
BrammerS.PavelinS. (2008). Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 120–136.
6.
BuhrN.FreedmanM. (2001). Culture, institutional factors and difference in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 293–322.
7.
BuniaminS.AlraziB.JohariN. H.RahmanN. R. (2008). An investigation of the association between corporate governance and environmental reporting in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 1(2), 65–88.
8.
BurgwalD. V.VieiraR. J. (2014). Environmental disclosure determinants in Dutch listed companies. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 25(64), 60–78.
9.
ChakladerB.GulatiP. A. (2015). A study of corporate environmental disclosure practices of companies doing business in India. Global Business Review, 16(2), 321–335.
10.
ChatterjeeB.MirM. Z. (2008). The current status of environmental reporting by Indian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(6), 609–629.
11.
ChauG.GrayS. J. (2010). Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19(3), 93–109.
12.
ChengS. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176.
13.
ChoC. H.PattenD. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647.
14.
ClarksonP. M.LiY.RichardsonG. D.VasvariF. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organisation and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327.
15.
CormierD.GordonI. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–616.
16.
CormierD.LedouxM.MagnanM. (2010). Corporate governance and information asymmetry between managers and investors. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(5), 574–589.
17.
CowanS.GadenneD. (2005). Australian corporate environmental reporting: A comparative analysis of disclosure practices across voluntary and mandatory disclosure systems. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 1(2), 165–179.
18.
DaltonD.DailyC.JohnsonJ.EllstrandA. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.
19.
D’AmicoE.ColucciaD.FontanaS.SolimeneS. (2016). Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 178–192.
20.
DeeganC.GordonB. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 187–199.
21.
DonnellyR.MulcahyM. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance, 16(5), 416–429.
22.
DragomirV. D. (2010). Environmentally sensitive disclosures and financial performance in a European setting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(3), 359–388.
23.
EngL.MakY. (2003). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325–345.
24.
EugenioT.LourencoI. C.MoraisA.I. (2010). Recent developments in social and environmental accounting research. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(2), 286–305.
25.
FamaE. F.JensenM. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–326.
26.
ForkerJ. R. (1992). Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research, 22(86), 111–124.
27.
FreedmanM.WasleyC. (1990). The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10-Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3(2), 183–193.
28.
GrayR.KouhyR.LaversS. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
29.
GuestP. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385–404.
30.
GulF. A.LeungS. (2004). Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(5), 351–379.
31.
HackstonD.MilneM. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108.
32.
HalmeM.HuseM. (1997). The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(2), 137–157.
33.
HaniffaR. M.CookeT. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317–349.
34.
HillC. W.JonesT. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.
35.
HoS. S.WongK. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139–156.
36.
IatridisG. E. (2013). Environmental disclosure quality: Evidence on environmental performance, corporate governance and value relevance. Emerging Markets Review, 14, 55–75.
37.
IenciuI. A. (2012). The relationship environmental reporting and corporate governance characteristics of Romanian listed companies. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 11(2), 267–294.
38.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–365.
39.
JoshiP. L.SuwaidanM. S.KumarR. (2011). Determinants of environmental disclosures by Indian industrial listed companies in their websites: Empirical study. International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3(2), 109–130.
40.
KassinisG.VafeasN. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 399–415.
41.
KeltonA. S.YangY. W. (2008). The impact of corporate governance on Internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(1), 62–87.
42.
LaidrooL. (2009). Association between ownership structure and public announcements’ disclosures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(1), 13–34.
43.
LakhalF. (2005). Voluntary earnings disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting & Finance, 4(3), 64–86.
44.
LiptonM.Lorsch.J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–78.
45.
LlenaF.MonevaJ. M.HernandezB. (2007). Environmental disclosures and compulsory accounting standards: The case of Spanish annual reports. Business Strategy and the Environment,16(1), 50–63.
46.
MakoriD. M.JagongoA. (2013). Environmental accounting and firm profitability: An empirical analysis of selected firms listed in bombay stock exchange, India. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 248–256.
47.
MalarvizhiP.YadavS. (2009). Corporate environmental disclosures on the internet: An emprical analysis of Indian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2(2), 211–232.
48.
MathewsM. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), 481–531.
49.
MathewsM. R. (2002). The development of social and environmental accounting research 1995–2000. Retrieved 2 January 2014, from mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10179/2548/205.pdf
50.
MonteiroS. M.Aibar-GuzmanB. (2010). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185–204.
51.
NurhayatiR.TaylorG.TowerG. (2015). Investigating social and environmental disclosure practices by listed Indian textile firms (Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Business and Social Sciences). The Journal of Developing Areas, Sydney, 201–212.
52.
OrtasE.Gallego-AlvarezI.EtxeberriaI. A. (2014). Financial factors influencing the quality of corporate social resoponsibility and environmental management disclosure: A quantile regression approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 362–380.
53.
OwenD. (2008). Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auiditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), 240–267.
54.
PahujaS. (2009). Relationship between environmental disclosures and corporate charact-eristics: A study of large manufacturing companies in India. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 227–244.
55.
ParkerL. D. (2005). Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 842–860.
56.
PattenD. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclsoure: A research note. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 27(8), 763–773.
57.
RaoK. K.TiltC. A.LesterL. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance, 12(2), 143–163.
58.
RobertsC. B. (1991). Environmental disclosures: A note on reporting practices in mainland Europe. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 62–71.
59.
SahayA. (2004). Environmental reporting by Indian corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 12–22.
60.
SenM.MukherjeeK.PattanayakJ. K. (2011). Corporate environmental disclosure practices in India. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(2), 139–156.
61.
VilliersC. D.NaikerV.StadenC. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.
62.
WallsJ. L.BerroneP.PhanP. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.
63.
WilmshurstT. D.FrostG. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26.
64.
WisemanJ. W. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organisation & Society, 7(1), 53–63.
