KissingerHenry, Diplomacy, New York, 1994, pp.23–24.
2.
George Bush in Preface to National Security of the United States, 1993, US Government Printing Office, January 1993, pp. i & ii.
3.
BanerjeeD., “Emerging International order: Conflict or Cooperation?”Strategic Analysis, Vol. XVI, No. 9, Dec. 1993, p.1147.
4.
SinghJasjit, “United Nations Peacekeeping Operation: The Challenges of Change,” in RajanMS (ed.) United Nations at 50 and Beyond, Lancers Books, New Delhi, 1996, p. 145.
5.
Brian Urquhart and Erskine Childers, Towards a More Effective United Nations, Uppsala, Sweden, 1991.
6.
JohnsonStanely P., World Population — Turning the Tide: Three Decades of Progress, London, 1991, pp.256–57.
7.
Brian Urquhart, n.5, p.51.
8.
Brian Urquhart and Erskine Childers, A World in Need of Leadership: Tomorrows United Nations, Dag Hammarsk jold Foundation, Uppsala, 1990, p.10.
9.
BanerjeeD., “An Emerging World Order”, US Journal, Jan-March 1994, p.42.
10.
BilgramiS.J.R., “United Nations: With and Without Cold War”, in MS Rajan n.4, p.249.
11.
The flames of ethnic nationalism in the Balkans, Chechnya, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia in the Caucasus among others are threatening international security.
12.
HannumHurst, “The Specter of Secession: Responding to Claims for Ethnic Self-Determination”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 22 March-April 1998, p. 13.
13.
TalibRashid, “Nationalism Redefined”, Hindustan Times, July 20, 1995.
14.
HuntingtonSamuel P., “The Clash of Civilization?”Foreign Affairs, Summer 1993, pp.22–49.
15.
See TibiBassam, The Challenge of Fundamentalism: Political Islam and the New World Disorders, London, 1998; John L. Esposito, The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality, New York, 1992.
16.
SinghJasjit, n.4, pp. 140–42.
17.
“Yes, we have slain a large dragon, but we live now in a jungle filled with a variety of poisonous snakes. And in many ways the dragon was easier to keep track of. James Woolsey, Director CIA, quoted in Richard Falk,” In Search of New World Model”, Current History, Vol. 92, No. 573, April 1993, p. 145.
18.
KumarDinesh, “Light Weapons are Taking a Heavy Toll”The Times of India. Jan 19, 1996.
19.
KamathP.M., “Terrorism in India: Impact on National Security”, Streategic AnalysisVol. XXV, No.9, Dec. 2001, p. 1086.
20.
“Alexandra Novoseloff: Revitalizing the United Nations: Anticipation and Prevention as Primary Goals”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XXVNo. 8 Nov. 2001, p. 948.
21.
KakKapil, “Humanitarian Intervention and the Changing Role of the UN”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XXIV, No. 7, Oct. 2000, pp. 1235–1244.
22.
DubeyMuchund, “Order Across Borders: NATO Usurping UN's Legitimate Role,”Times of India, Nov. 5, 1998.
23.
UdayBhaskar C., “Post-Cold War Security”, Strategic AnalysisVol. XXI, No. 8 Nov. 1997, p. 1136.
24.
25.
Ibid. pp. 1143–46.
26.
“Redefining Security: The Human Dimension”Hitman Development Report 1999, publised in Current History, Vol. 94No. 592, May 1995, p. 229.
27.
28.
KanwalGurmeet, “The New World Order: An Appraisal-I”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XXIII, No.3, June 1999, p. 361.
29.
JoshiAkshay, “The Information Revolution and National Power: Political Aspects-II”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XXIII, No. 6, September 1999. p. 1014.
30.
See McNeillWilliam H., “Winds of Change” and Stanley Hoffman, “A New, World and its Troubles” in RizopoulosNicholas X (ed.) Sea Changes, Council of Foreign Relations Press, New York 1990 pp. 163–203, 274–292, D Banerjee (ed.) Security in the New World Order, New Delhi, 1997.
31.
JoshiAkshay, “The Information Revolution and National Power: Political Aspects-I”, Strategic AnalysisVol. XXIII, No. 5 August 1999, p. 763.
32.
GombertDavid C., “National Security in the Information Age”, Naval War College Review, Autumn 1998, p. 28.
33.
JoshiAkshay, n. 31, p. 775.
34.
BhogalParminder S., “New World Order and United Nations”, Mainstream, October 10, 1992, p. 23.
35.
KrauthammerCharles, “The Unipolar Moment”, Foreign Affairs, 70(i), 1991, p. 24.
36.
FriedbergAaron L., “The Future of American Power”, Political Science Qauterly, 109, (17) Spring 1994, p. 21.
37.
38.
KumarSatish, “The Post-Cold War International System: An Indian Perspective”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XXI, No. 6, Sept. 1999, p. 829.
39.
BilgramiS.J.R., No. 10, p. 250.
40.
KanwalGurmeet, “The New World order: An appraisal”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. X-XXII, No. 3, June 1949, n.28, p. 346.
41.
NovosseloffAlexandra, n. 20. p. 949.
42.
D'MelloAshley, “There are Other Poles of Influence in the UN than the US”, The Times of India, July 31, 1998.
43.
There is an advocacy of the replacement of the UN with a “Third World Organisation” See BertrandMauriceWornerDaniel (eds.), A New Charter for a World Wide Organisation, The Hague, 1996.
44.
VedantamShabhavi, United Nations: Putting Words to work, Vikas, New Delhi, 1996.
45.
Secretary General Boutros — Boutros Ghali launched the first round of reform at the beginning of his term in 1992.
46.
BilgramiS.J.R., n. 10, p.251.
47.
In the run up to the UN's 50th anniversary in 1995, Foundations and Government commissioned a number of major reform studies. Among others are the Ramphal/Carlsson Report (Our Global Neighbourhood), the Qureshi Weizsacker Report (The United Nations in its Second Half Century: A Report of the Independent working Group on the Future of the United Nations), the South Centre Report (For a Strong and Democratic United Nations: A South Perspetive on UN Reform)..
48.
The Commission on Global Governance was established in 1992 in belief that the international developments had created a unique opportunity for strengthening global cooperation.
49.
US views on Reform Measures Necessary for Strengthening the United Nations System, Feb. 1999 and Preparing the United Nations for its Second Fifty Years, April 1996.
50.
Documents “Track I” (A/51/829) of March 17, 1997 and “Track II (A/51/950) of July 16, 1997.
51.
Renewing the United Nations: A Programme for Reform — Secretary General's Report of July 14, 1997.
52.
We the people defined the agenda of the Millennium Summit which was to be held in New York from September 6 to 8, 2000. The Secretary General listed six shared values of particular reference to the new century: Freedom, Equity and Solidarity, Tolerance, Non-violence, Respect of Nature, and Shared Responsibility.
53.
A/res/55/2 — The Declaration emphasised that, “the central challenge that we face today is to ensure that globalisation becomes a positive force for all the world people”. It highlighted the idea of protecting the vulnerable.
54.
Renewing the United Nations — Part I.
55.
Track II (A/51/950).
56.
Renewing the United Nations, n.47.
57.
Divergence of views regarding reforms exists at various levels-while the NGOs want more democratic UN, technocrats demand more productivity and efficiency from staff, member states favour reform that conforms to national interest and national power, the idealists wish to see an expanded UN and the conservatives favour a downsized UN.
58.
BilgramiS.J.R., n.10, pp.260–261.
59.
NovosseloffAlexandra, n.20, p.953–956.
60.
BilgramiS.J.R., n.10, pp 260–261.
61.
On reformatory suggestions see: Boutros — Boutros Ghali, Agenda for Peace1992, Erskine Childers and Brian Urquhart, Renewing the United Nations System, 1994, Carlsson and Ramphal, Our Global Neighbourhood, N. Krishnan, A Reformed UN for a Better World, paper read at a Seminar Organised by the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, New Delhi, August 22, 1995.
62.
On Security Council reform SeeRajanM. S., “The United Nations since the end of the Cold War”, in RajanM. S. (ed.) United Nations at 50 and Beyond, Lancer Books, New Delhi, 1996, pp. 18–20.
63.
The operation of globalisation is largely unaccountable, unregulated, uncontrolled and regressive. It is selective in its benefits and is bypassing many poor countries. The states are more vulnerable to shocks as is evidenced from the economic crisis in Indonesia and Argentina.
64.
The Commission on Global Governance recommended a 23 Member Economic Security Council. Independent Group on the Future of the United Nations (Yale University) recommended the creation of two bodies — Economic Council and Security Council, each with 23 members.
65.
Carlsson/Ramphal Report and Secretary General's Report of July 14, 1997 made similar observations.
66.
NovoseeloffAlexandra, n.20, pp 957–958.
67.
SrivastavaH.K., “Principles of War and Principles of Peacekeeping: A Solider's Paradox”, Strategic Analysis, Vol. XVII, No. 8, November 1994, pp. 1039–1052. Arun Kumar Banerji, “Fifty years of UN Peacekeeping: Overstretch, Retrenchment and Reassessment”, India Quarterly, Vol. VIII, No.1 and 2, Jan-June 1997, pp.115–134.
68.
The Secretary General on March 7, 2000 convened a panel on United Nations Peace Operation to assess the shortcomings of the system and make recommendation for changes. The panel comprising M. Lakhdar Brahimi (Chairman) and nine members presented its report on August 17, 2000, defining twenty priorities.
69.
For financial problems see Secretary General's Annual Report for 1993–94, Building Peace and Development, New York, 1994, pp. 35–37.