The article engages with the theoretical debate on norms to explicate the prescriptive power of the ‘norm’ of sustainable development. It analyses the socio-economic and political context that have been instrumental in framing of the ‘norm’ of sustainable development, in particular the approach and interventions of developing countries including India. It argues that an ostensible dichotomy between development and environment has fractured the internal cohesion of the norm. The surrounding web of normative structure that marginalises principles of justice and equity is other formidable explanation for its fragile compliance.
Agarwal, Anil, Narain, Sunita and Sharma, Anju (eds). 1999 and 2001. Green politics: Global environment negotiation, Vols 1 and 2. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.
2.
Alderson, Kai. July 2001. Making sense of state socialization. Review of International Studies, 27(3), 415–33.
3.
Axelrod, Robert. December 1986. An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–111.
4.
Boardman, Robert. 1981. International organisation and the protection of nature. London: Macmillan.
5.
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. On compliance. International Organisation, 47, Spring(2), 175–205.
6.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. January 1998. Review: The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–48.
7.
CISDL (Centre for International Sustainable Development Law). 2005. What is sustainable development law? Concept Paper. Montreal: CISDL.
8.
Claussen, Eileen and Diringer, Elliot. 2007, July 20. U.S. exceptionalism and climate change, in The Globalist. Retrieved 2 February 2011, from http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=6356.
9.
Dryzek, John S. 1997. The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917.
11.
Florini, Ann. 1996. Evolution of international norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 363–89.
12.
Franck, T.M. 1990. The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Gibbs, Jack P. March 1965. Norms: The problem of definition and classification. The American Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 586–94.
14.
Grober, Ulrich. 2007. Deep roots—A conceptual history of sustainable development, WZB Discussion Paper
15.
No. 2007-002, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (Social Science Research Centre, Berlin).
16.
Gupta, Joyeeta. 2005. ‘The climate change regime: De jure and de facto commitment to sustainable development’, in Jouni Paavola and Ian Lowe (eds), Environmental values in a globalising world: Nature, justice and governance. London: Routledge.
17.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organisation, 46(1): 1–35.
18.
Herrmann, Richard K. and Shannon, Vaughn P. 2001. Defending international norms: The role of obligation, material interest, and perception in decision making. International Organization, 55, Summer(3), 621–54.
19.
Holdgate, Martin W., Kassas, M. and White, F.G. (eds). 1982. The world environment 1972–1982: A report by the United Nations Environment Programme. Dublin: Tycooly.
20.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2005. Legitimacy and the use of force: Can the circle be squared. Review of International Studies, 31(S1): 15–32.
21.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1984. The force of prescriptions. International Organisation, 38, Autumn(4), 685–708.
22.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1978. Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace, 5th edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
23.
Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission Report). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. What makes the world hang together: Neo utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organisation, 52, Autumn(4), 855–85.
25.
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). 2002. Harnessing technologies for sustainable development. Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.
26.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1988. The public and environment: The state of the environment. Nairobi: UNEP.
27.
Weizsäcker, Ernst U. Von.1994. Earth politics. London: Zed Books.
28.
Wiener, Antje. 2004. Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 189–234.
29.
World Resources Institute. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment, 2005: Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
