Leadership competencies act as a precursor in catalysing bureaucratic reform and propelling long-term development, yet the multitude of political tensions and policy conundrums has called for a deeper examination of the individual capabilities needed to satisfy public expectations. Taking on a comparative case study approach in East Java, Indonesia, we dissect the dynamic relationship between leadership competencies, individual policy capacity and regional development, positioning that these three elements form a symbiotic capability matrix that transcends their individual boundaries. We unveil how autonomous and proactive leaders, while operating within established structures and networks, leverage the power of social embeddedness, thus crystallizing it as an integral pillar for successful regional development. Through the embodiment of interdependence and relational dynamics, we foster a paradigm shift from an individualistic perspective to a context-aware, relation-centred approach within leadership and regional development landscapes.
AhmadE., & MansoorA. (2002). Indonesia: Managing decentralization. In AhmadE. and TanziV. (Eds.), Managing fiscal decentralization. Routledge.
2.
AsencioH., & MujkicE. (2016). Leadership behaviors and trust in leaders: Evidence from the US federal government. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 156–179.
3.
ADB. (2020). Indonesia: Country partnership strategy (2020–2024). https://www.adb.org/documents/indonesia-country-partnership-strategy-2020-2024
4.
AsmorowatiS., SchubertV., & NingrumA. P. (2022). Policy capacity, local autonomy, and human agency: Tensions in the intergovernmental coordination in Indonesia’s social welfare response amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(2), 213–227.
BardhanP., & MookherjeeD. (2006). Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective. MIT Press.
7.
BartlettL., & VavrusF. (2016). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Taylor & Francis.
8.
BassB. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32.
9.
BransM., & HondeghemA. (2005). Competency frameworks in the Belgian governments: Causes, construction and contents. Public Administration, 83(4), 823–837.
10.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
11.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Transformational leadership theory. InLeadership. Harper & Row.
12.
CornwallA., & CoelhoV. S. (Eds.). (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas (Vol. 4). Zed Books.
13.
CrosbyB. C., & BrysonJ. M. (2005). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world (Vol. 264). John Wiley & Sons.
14.
EjimaboN. O. (2013). Understanding the impact of leadership in Nigeria: Its reality, challenges, and perspectives. SAGE Open, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013490704
15.
FirmanT. (2009). Decentralization reform and local-government proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a fragmentation of regional development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies: Journal of the Applied Regional Science Conference, 21(2–3), 143–157.
16.
FleurkeF., & WillemseR. (2004). Approaches to decentralization and local autonomy: A critical appraisal. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(4), 523–544.
17.
FukuyamaF. (2013). What is governance?Governance, 26(3), 347–368.
18.
FungA. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
19.
GentryW. A., & SparksT. E. (2012). A convergence/divergence perspective of leadership competencies managers believe are most important for success in organizations: A cross-cultural multilevel analysis of 40 countries. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 15–30.
20.
GuestG., BunceA., & JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
21.
GuptaV., ChopraS., & KakaniR. K. (2018). Leadership competencies for effective public administration: A study of Indian Administrative Service officers. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(1), 98–120.
22.
HillH., & VidyattamaY. (2016). Regional development dynamics in Indonesia before and after the ‘Big Bang’ decentralization. The Singapore Economic Review, 61(02), 1640027.
23.
HofmanB., KaiserK., & SchulzeG. G. (2009). Corruption and decentralization. In HoltzappelC. J. G. and RamstedtM. (Eds.), Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges (pp. 99–113). ISEAS Publishing.
24.
HoltzappelC. J., & RamstedtM. (2009). Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia: Implementation and challenges. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
25.
HowlettM., MukherjeeI., & WooJ. J. (2015). From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research. Policy & Politics, 43(2), 291–311.
26.
HowlettM., & RameshM. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313.
27.
IrawantoD. W., RamseyP. L., & RyanJ. C. (2011). Challenge of leading in Javanese culture. Asian Ethnicity, 12(2), 125–139.
28.
IsufajM. (2014). Decentralization and the increased autonomy in local governments. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 459–463.
29.
KhanM. M., & IslamS. M. (2014). Public sector leadership development in Bangladesh: Present state and future prospect. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 10(1), 17–30.
30.
KingC., & CruickshankM. (2012). Building capacity to engage: Community engagement or government engagement?Community Development Journal, 47(1), 5–28.
31.
LeeuwF. L. (2020). Can governments learn? Comparative perspectives on evaluation and organizational learning. Routledge.
32.
MaryanovG. S. (2009). Decentralization in Indonesia as a political problem. Equinox Publishing.
33.
MegheirkouniM. (2017). Leadership styles and organizational learning in UK for-profit and non-profit sports organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(4), 596–612.
34.
NeoB. S., & ChenG. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore (English version). World Scientific.
35.
OpenjuruG. L., JaitliN., TandonR., & HallB. (2015). Despite knowledge democracy and community-based participatory action research: Voices from the global south and excluded north still missing. Action Research, 13(3), 219–229.
PatemanC. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.
38.
PynesJ. E. (2008). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations: A strategic approach (Vol. 30). John Wiley & Sons.
39.
RaffelJ. A., LeisinkP., & MiddlebrooksA. E. (Eds.). (2009). Public sector leadership: International challenges and perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
40.
RaginC. C., & ByrneD. (2009). The SAGE handbook of case-based methods. Sage Publishing.
41.
RibotJ. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute.
42.
RibotJ. (2021). Representation, citizenship and the public domain: Choice and recognition in natural resource decentralization. In CrawfordG. and AbdulaiA.-G. (Eds.), Research handbook on democracy and development (pp. 503–521). Edward Elgar Publishing.
43.
SanghiS. (2016). The handbook of competency mapping: Understanding, designing and implementing competency models in organizations. Sage Publishing.
44.
TalithaT., FirmanT., & HudalahD. (2020). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: A regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 690–708.
45.
TanS. Y. (2019). Bureaucratic autonomy and policy capacity in the implementation of capitation payment systems in primary healthcare: Comparative case studies of three districts in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(3), 330–350.
46.
TandonR. (2008). Participation, citizenship and democracy: Reflections on 25 years’ of PRIA. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 284–296.
47.
The Ministry of Villages’ Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration. (2019). Village Development Index. The Ministry of Villages’ Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration.
48.
The World Bank. (2002). Indonesia—Local government and decentralization project. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/469171468284127865/indonesia-local-government-and-decentralization-project
49.
ThornI. M. (2012). Leadership in international organizations: Global leadership competencies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 15(3), 158–163.
50.
TurnerM. (2005). Regional autonomy and the state in Indonesia. In WellerM. and WolffS. (Eds.), Autonomy, self-governance and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies (Vol. 33, p. 186). Routledge.
51.
WongW. (2022). When the state fails, bureaucrats and civil society step up: Analysing policy capacity with political nexus triads in the policy responses of Hong Kong to COVID-19. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(2), 198–212.
52.
WuX., RameshM., & HowlettM. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.
53.
WuX., RameshM., & HowlettM. (Eds.) (2018). Policy capacity: Conceptual framework and essential components. Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice (pp. 1–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
YuklG. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 49–53.
