This article examines the effect of the unpredictability of Aid for Trade (AfT) flows on trade policy in 124 recipient-countries, of which 42 are least developed countries (LDCs), over the period 2002–2016. The analysis shows that while AfT flows exert a positive effect on trade policy liberalisation, AfT unpredictability induces the adoption of restrictive trade policies. These results apply to LDCs and other countries, although the magnitude of the negative effect of AfT unpredictability on trade policy liberalisation is higher for LDCs than for other countries. Furthermore, AfT unpredictability reduces the positive trade policy liberalisation effect of AfT flows.
AdamsC. S. (2005). Exogenous inflows and real exchange rates: Theoretical quirk or empirical reality?Seminar Organised by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Foreign Aid and Macroeconomic Management in Maputo, Mozambique, 14–15 March.
2.
AggarwalA. (2004). Macroeconomic determinants of antidumping: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. World Development, 32(6), 1043–1057.
3.
AncharazV. D. (2003). Determinants of trade policy reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 12(3), 417–443.
4.
ArellanoM.BoverO. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.
5.
BearceD. H.FinkelS. E.Pérez-LiñánA. S.Rodríguez-ZepedaJ.Surzhko-HarnedL. (2013). Has the new aid for trade agenda been export effective? Evidence on the Impact of US AfT allocations 1999–2008. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 163–170.
6.
BerghA.NilssonT. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488–505.
7.
BjørnskovC. (2016). Economic freedom and economic crises. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.08.003
8.
BlundellR.BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
9.
BowsherC. G. (2002). On testing overidentifying restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Economics Letters, 77(2), 211–220.
10.
BulířA.HamannA. J. (2003). Aid volatility: An empirical assessment. IMF Staff Papers, 50(1), 64–89.
11.
BulířA.HamannA. J. (2008). Volatility of development aid: From the frying pan into the fire. World Development, 36(10), 2048–2066.
12.
BusseM.HoekstraR.KönigerJ. (2012). The impact of aid for trade facilitation on the costs of trading. Kyklos, 65(2), 143–163.
13.
CalìM.te VeldeD. (2011). Does aid for trade really improve trade performance? World Development, 39(5), 725–740.
14.
CelasunO.WalliserJ. (2007). Predictability of aid: Do fickle donors undermine economic development?Paper presented at the 46th Panel Meeting of Economic Policy in Lisbon, 19–20 October.
15.
CelasunO.WalliserJ.TavaresJ.GuisoL. (2008). Predictability of aid: Do fickle donors undermine aid effectiveness? Economic Policy, 23(55), 545–594.
16.
ChauvetL.GuillaumontP. (2008). Aid, volatility and growth again. When aid volatility matters and when it does not. WIDER working paper 78/2008, UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU/WIDER), Finland.
17.
CombesJ. L.Saadi-SedikT. (2006). How does trade openness influence budget deficits in developing countries? The Journal of Development Studies, 42(8), 1401–1416.
18.
EsfahaniH. S.SquireL. (2007). Explaining trade policy in the Middle East and North Africa. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(5), 660–684.
19.
GnangnonS. K. (2014). The effect of development aid unpredictability and migrants’ remittances on fiscal consolidation in developing countries. World Development, 54, 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.08.003
20.
GnangnonS. K. (2017). Empirical evidence on the impact of multilateral trade liberalization on domestic trade policy. Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, 17(3), 1–14.
21.
GnangnonS. K. (2018a). Aid for trade and trade policy in recipient countries. The International Trade Journal, 32(5), 439–464.
22.
GnangnonS. K. (2018b). Aid for trade and recipient countries’ export structure: Does trade policy liberalisation matter? Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 18(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976747918806361
23.
GnangnonS. K. (2019). Aid for trade and export diversification in recipient‐countries. The World Economy, 42(2), 396–418.
24.
GnangnonS. K.RobertsM. (2017). Aid for trade, foreign direct investment and export upgrading in recipient countries. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 8(2), 1750010.
25.
HelbleM. C.MannC. L.WilsonJ. S. (2012). Aid-for-trade facilitation. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 148(2), 357–376.
26.
HudsonJ. (2015). Consequences of aid volatility for macroeconomic management and aid effectiveness. World Development, 69, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.010
27.
HudsonJ.MosleyP. (2008a). The macroeconomic impact of aid volatility. Economics Letters, 99(3), 486–489.
28.
HudsonJ.MosleyP. (2008b). Aid volatility, policy and development. World Development, 36(10), 2082–2102.
29.
HühneP.MeyerB.NunnenkampP. (2014a). Who benefits from aid for trade? Comparing the effects on recipient versus donor exports. Journal of Development Studies, 50(9), 1275–1288.
30.
HühneP.MeyerB.NunnenkampP. (2014b). Aid for trade: Assessing the effects on recipient exports of manufactures and primary commodities to donors and non-donors. Kiel Working papers, No. 1953. Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
31.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research No. 5430 (WPS5430), Washington, DC.
32.
KodamaM. (2012). Aid unpredictability and economic growth. World Development, 40(2), 266–272.
33.
La FerraraE. (1996). A political equilibrium approach to trade liberalization in developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 5(3), 287–318.
34.
Martinez-ZarzosoI.Nowak-LehmannF.RehwaldK. (2017). Is aid for trade effective? A panel quantile regression approach. Review of Development Economics, 21(4), e175–e203.
35.
MillerT.KimA. B.RobertsJ.M.TyrrellP. (2019). 2019 index of economic freedom, institute for economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2019/book/index_2019.pdf
36.
MilnerH. V.KubotaK. (2005). Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries. International Organization, 59(1), 107–143.
37.
OdedokunM. (2003). Analysis of deviations and delays in aid disbursements. Journal of Economic Development, 28(1), 137–169.
38.
RajanR. G.SubramanianA. (2005). What undermines aid’s impact on growth?IMF working papers, WP/05/126. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
39.
RodrikD. (1995). Political economy of trade policy. In GrossmanG.RogoffK. (Eds.), Handbook of international economics(pp. 1457–94+). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Press.
40.
RoodmanD. M. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.
41.
RoseA. K. (2013). The march of an economic idea? Protectionism isn’t counter-cyclic (Anymore). Economic Policy, 28(76), 569–612.
42.
SachsJ. D.WarnerA. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 26(1), 1–118.
43.
SvalerydH.VlachosJ. (2002). Markets for risk and openness to trade: How are they related? Journal of International Economics, 57(2), 369–395.
44.
TresselT.PratiA. (2006). Aid volatility and Dutch disease: Is there a role for macroeconomic policies?IMF Working Papers, 2006/145.
45.
Vargas HillR. (2005). Assessing rhetoric and reality in the predictability of aid. Human Development Report 2005, New York, NY: UNDP.
46.
VijilM.WagnerL. (2012). Does aid for trade enhance export performance? Investigating on the infrastructure channel. The World Economy, 35(7), 838–868.
47.
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2005). Ministerial declaration on Doha work programme, adopted on 18 December 2005 at the sixth session of trade ministers conference. Hong Kong, 13–18 December 2005. Reference Number: WT/MIN(05)/DEC.
48.
ZiliakJ. P. (1997). Efficient estimation with panel data when instruments are predetermined: An empirical comparison of moment-condition estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15(4), 419–431.
