Few studies have examined intimate partner physical violence (IPPV) in south India. This article examines the frequency and correlates of IPPV among 898 young married women from urban, rural, and periurban areas of Mysore, India. Most (69.2%) of the participants were Hindus and 28.7% were Muslims. Overall, 50% of participants reported some type of IPPV. Factors that were independently associated with IPPV included being younger than 18 years at the time of marriage, contributing some household income, having anal sex, reporting sexual violence, and having a sex partner who drinks alcohol and smokes cigarettes. Women with skilled occupation were at reduced odds of experiencing IPPV compared with women who did not work. These findings suggest that IPPV is highly prevalent in this setting and that additional interventions are needed to reduce morbidity particularly among young women. These data also suggest that more studies are needed among men who perpetrate IPPV in south India.
HeiseLEllsbergMGottemoellerM. Ending Violence Against Women. Population Reports, Series L (11); 2003.
2.
World Health Organization. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006. http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en/. Accessed September 29, 2011.
3.
Population Information Program at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Population report: ending violence against women. Issues in the World. 1999;Series L(11).
4.
SilvermanJGGuptaJDeckerMRKapurNRajA. Intimate partner violence and unwanted pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth among a national sample of Bangladeshi women. BJOG. 2007;114:1246-1252.
5.
GilbertL. Urban violence and health—South Africa 1995. Soc Sci Med.1996;43:873-886.
6.
DeckerMRSeageGR3rdHemenwayD. Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women’s HIV infection: findings from Indian husband-wife dyads. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51:593-600.
7.
SalariZNakhaeeN. Identifying types of domestic violence and its associated risk factors in a pregnant population in Kerman hospitals, Iran Republic. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2008;20:49-55.
8.
Rivera-RiveraLLazcano-PonceESalmeron-CastroJSalazar-MartinezECastroRHernandez-AvilaM. Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: a population-based study. Salud Publica Mex. 2004;46:113-122.
9.
JewkesRLevinJPenn-KekanaL. Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1603-1617.
10.
AnderssonNHo-FosterAMitchellSScheepersEGoldsteinS. Risk factors for domestic physical violence: national cross-sectional household surveys in eight southern African countries. BMC Womens Health. 2007;7:11.
11.
BangRABangATBaituleMChoudharyYSarmukaddamSTaleO. High prevalence of gynaecological diseases in rural Indian women. Lancet. 1989;1(8629):85-88.
12.
ReichenheimMEDiasASMoraesCL. Co-occurrence of physical violence against partners and their children in health services. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40:595-603.
13.
NtaganiraJMuulaASSiziyaSStoskopfCRudatsikiraE. Factors associated with intimate partner violence among pregnant rural women in Rwanda. Rural Remote Health. 2009;9:1153.
14.
HassanFSadowskiLSBangdiwalaSI. Physical intimate partner violence in Chile, Egypt, India and the Philippines. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004;11:111-116.
15.
Garcia-MorenoCJansenHAEllsbergMHeiseLWattsCH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet. 2006;368:1260-1269.
16.
MohammadkhaniPForouzanASKhooshabiKSAssariSLankaraniMM. Are the predictors of sexual violence the same as those of nonsexual violence? A gender analysis. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2215-2223.
17.
TrickettPKNollJgPutnamFW. The impact of sexual abuse on female development: lessons from a multigenerational, longitudinal research study. Dev Psychopathol. 2011;23:453-476.
18.
WhiteJWSmithPH. A longitudinal perspective on physical and sexual intimate partner violence against women. In: FisherBS ed. Violence Against Women and Family Violence: Developments in Research, Practice, and Policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2004.
19.
International Clinical Epidemiologists Network, International Center for Research on Women. Domestic Violence in India 3: A Summary Report of a Multi-Site Household Survey. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women and the Centre for Development and Population Activities; 2000.
20.
KaurRGargS. Domestic violence against women: a qualitative study in a rural community. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2010;22:242-251.
21.
BabuBVKarSK. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: a population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:129.
22.
RoccaCHRathodSFalleTPandeRPKrishnanS. Challenging assumptions about women’s empowerment: social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban south India. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:577-585.
23.
DalalKDLindqvistK. A national study of the prevalence and correlates of domestic violence among women in India [Published online ahead of print November30, 2010]. Asia Pac J Public Health. doi:10.1177/1010539510384499
24.
BabuBVKarSK. Domestic violence in eastern India: factors associated with victimization and perpetration. Public Health. 2010;124:136-148.
25.
KruppKMadhivananPKaratC. Novel recruitment strategies to increase participation of women in reproductive health research in India. Glob Public Health. 2007;2:395-403.
26.
World Health Organization. Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
27.
International Center for Research on Women. Women-Initiated Community Level Responses to Domestic Violence: Summary Report of Three Studies. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women; 2002.
28.
KoenigMAAhmedSHossainMBKhorshed Alam MozumderAB. Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: individual- and community-level effects. Demography. 2003;40:269-288.
29.
HindinMJAdairLS. Who’s at risk? Factors associated with intimate partner violence in the Philippines. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1385-1399.
