Public health action does not automatically follow the presentation to appropriate authorities of the results of community surveys, including those to assess the prevalence and cause of malnutrition. To stimulate action, results have to be presented in various levels of sophistication for different audiences. Such results need to be given with suggestions for potential solutions within local financial and ecological constraints and with realistic recognition of political issues and priorities.
2. Gordon JE: Field epidemiology. Am J Med Sci1963; 246: 132–38.
3.
3. Kune JB: Some reasons influencing the mortality of under fives in a rural area of Kenya: a multivariate analysis. J Trop Pediatr1980; 26: 114–19.
4.
4. IUNS (International Union of Nutritional Sciences): Guidelines on the at-risk concept and the health and nutrition of young children. Am J Clin Nutr1977; 30: 242–53.
5.
5. Zeitlin M, Bajrai JD: Politic deviance in nutrition: an appraisal to child health whose time has come. Adv Nut Mat Chld Hlth1987; 7 (in press).
6.
6. Al-Dabbagh A, Ebrahim GJ: The preventable antecedents of childhood malnutrition. J Trop Pediatr1984; 30: 50–55.
7.
7. Backett EM, Davies AM, Petros-Barvazian A: The Risk Appraisal in Public Health. Geneva1984 (WHO paper No. 76).
8.
8. Jelliffe DB: The Assessment of the Nutritional Status of the Community. Geneva1966 (WHO Monograph No. 53).
9.
9. Burgess HJL, Burgess AP: A field workers' guide to a nutritional status survey. Am J Clin Nutr1974; 28: 1299–309.
10.
10. Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EFP: Community Nutritional Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.