This article offers the first empirical account of the role of County Sport Partnerships (CSPs) in delivering grassroots sport policy in the UK. Current leading academic approaches to policy delivery in the UK suggest that we have witnessed a move from ‘big’ government to governance by and through networks and partnerships. Such a process is said to have led to a dispersal of power among many actors and diminished the ability of the state to control policy. Our empirical study of CSPs – including 10 in-depth interviews with key actors – suggests otherwise: grassroots sport policy delivery does take place via ‘partnerships’, but such arrangements are not to be confused with ‘new governance’. On the contrary, government policy delivery has never been so centrally managed, monitored and controlled.
BevirMRhodesRAW (2008) The differentiated policy as narrative. British Journal of Politics and International Relations10(4): 729–734.
5.
BrookesSWigganJ (2009) Reflecting the public value of sport. A game of two halves?Public Management Review11(4): 401–420.
6.
Central Council for Physical Recreation (2005) NGB Funding: An Analysis of the Funding Profiles of National Sports Organisations. Carnegie Faculty Leeds Metropolitan University in co-operation with Wharton Consulting, March.
7.
ChittyC (2004) Education Policy in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CoalterF (1988) Sport and anti-social behaviour: A literature review. Research Report, Scottish Sports Council.
9.
CoalterF (1990) The mixed economy of leisure. In: HenryIP (ed.) Management and Planning in the Leisure Industries. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 3–31.
10.
CoalterF (2007) A Wider Social Role for Sport. Who’s Keeping the Score?London: Routledge.
11.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2008a) 2012 Legacy Action Plan Before, During and After: Making the Most of the London 2012 Games. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
12.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2008b) Playing to Win: A New Era for Sport. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
13.
Department for Culture, Media and Sport/Strategy Unit (2002) Game Plan: A Strategy for Delivering Government’s Sport and Physical Activity Objectives. London: Strategy Unit.
14.
Department of National Heritage (1995) Sport: Raising the Game. London: Department of National Heritage.
15.
GoodwinMGrixJ (forthcoming) Bringing structures back in: The ‘governance narrative’, the ‘decentred approach’ and ‘asymmetrical network governance’ in the education and sport policy communities. Public Administration.
16.
GreenM (2004) Changing policy priorities for sport in England: The emergence of elite sport development as a key policy concern. Leisure Studies23(4): 365–385.
17.
GreenM (2006) From ‘sport for all’ to not about ‘sport’ at all? Interrogating sport policy interventions in the United Kingdom. European Sport Management Quarterly6(3): 217–238.
18.
GrixJ (2009) The impact of UK sport policy on the governance of athletics. International Journal of Sport Policy1(1): 31–49.
19.
GrixJ (2010a) The Foundations of Research, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
20.
GrixJ (2010b) The ‘governance debate’ and the study of sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy2(2): 159–171.
21.
GrixJPhillpotsL (forthcoming) Revisiting the ‘governance narrative’: ‘Asymmetrical network governance’ and the deviant case of the sports policy sector. Public Policy and Administration.
22.
HenryIP (1993) The Politics of Leisure Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
23.
HenryIP (2001) Sport in the City: The Role of Sport in Economic and Social Regeneration. London: Routledge.
24.
HoodCJamesOJonesGScottCTraversT (1998) Regulation inside government: Where new public management meets the audit explosion. Public Money & Management18(2): 61–68.
25.
HoulihanB (1991) The Government and Politics of Sport. London: Routledge.
26.
HoulihanB (1997) Sport, Policy and Politics: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
27.
HoulihanBGreenM (2009) Modernisation and sport: The reform of Sport England and UK Sport. Public Administration87(3): 678–698.
28.
JefferyC (2003) Devolution: Challenging Local Government?York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
29.
KendallIHollowayD (2001) Public Policy under Blair. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
30.
LeachRPercy-SmithJ (2001) Local Governance in Britain. London: Macmillan.
31.
MarshD (2008) Understanding British government: Analysing competing models. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations10(2): 251–268.
32.
McKibbinR (1997) Very Old Labour. London: Review of Books.
33.
NewmanJ (2001) Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy, and Society. London: SAGE.
34.
RhodesRAW (1994) The hollowing out of the state. The Political Quarterly65: 138–151.
35.
RhodesRAW (1997) Understanding Governance. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
36.
RhodesRAW (2007) Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies28(8): 1243–1264.
37.
RobsonS (2008) Partnerships in sport. In: HyltonKBramhamP (eds) Sports Development. Policy, Process and Practice. London: Routledge, 118–140.
38.
SandersonI (2002) Making sense of ‘what works’: Evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality?Public Policy and Administration17(3): 61–75.
39.
SkelcherC (2000) Changing images of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration15(3): 3–19.
Sport England (2004) The Framework for Sport in England: Making England an Active and Successful Sporting Nation: A Vision for 2020. London: Sport England.
Sports Council (1997) England The Sporting Nation. London: The Sports Council.
47.
StokerG (2000) The New Politics of British Local Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
TaylorA (1997) Arm’s length but hands-on. Mapping the new governance: The Department of National Heritage and cultural politics in Britain. Public Administration75: 441–466.
