Application of APACHE II in the Assessment,Classification of Severity and Predictive Ability of Chinese Patients Presenting to an Emergency Department Resuscitation Room

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the use of APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Status Evaluation) in Chinese patients managed in the resuscitation room of an Accident & Emergency Department of one of the teaching hospitals in Hong Kong.

Design

Prospective study on Chinese patients.

Setting

Resuscitation Room in an Accident & Emergency Department of a university hospital in Hong Kong.

Patients and measurements

Consecutive patients managed in the resuscitation room between 14th August, 2000 and 20th August 2000 (excluding patients younger than 18 years old and patients who were not admitted to hospital after initial assessment and treatment). For each patient, demographic data, diagnosis, the chronic health points, and the worst physiological parameters in the A&E resuscitation room were recorded. The total APACHE II scores and the probability of death were calculated. The accuracy of APACHE II for predicting group mortality was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and linear regression analysis.

Results

Of the 88 patients included in the study, 13 (15%) died and 75 (85%) survived. Significant factors associated with mortality included age, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, arterial pH, serum sodium, Glasgow coma score, and chronic health points. For the three scoring subdivisions of APACHE II – total APS score, age points and chronic health points – higher mean values were found in those patients who died compared with patients who survived. Using logistic regression analysis, the APACHE II score determined in the emergency resuscitation room is a strong predictor of mortality (r²=0.712). At a cut off score of >28 the sensitivity is 100.0% (95% CI 100.0–100.0), specificity is 68.0% (95% CI 56.2–78.3), positive likelihood ratio is 3.13, positive predictive value is 35.1 and negative likelihood ratio is 100.0. Analysis of the ROC curve reveals an area under the curve of 0.910 (95% CI 0.829–0.960). In patients not admitted to ICU, there was a positive correlation between APACHE score and length of hospital stay in patient who survived (r=0.320, P=0.0075) and a negative correlation between APACHE score and length of hospital stay in patients who died (r=-0.760, P=0.0225).

Conclusions

The APACHE II scoring system may be usefully applied in emergency departments for predicting mortality, for classifying and assessing severity of disease, for evaluating performance and for planning departmental resource allocation.

Keywords

APACHE critical care mortality severity of illness index survival

References

Cullen

D.J.

, Chernow

Predicting outcome in critically ill patients.

Crit Care Med 1994; 22(9): 1345–8.

Ruark

J.E.

, Raffin

T.A.

Initiating and withdrawing life support.

N Engl J Med 1988; 318(1): 25–30.

Lee

D.K.

, Swinburne

A.J.

, Fedullo

A.J.

Withdrawing care. Experience in a medical intensive care unit.

JAMA 1994; 271(17): 1358–61.

Rapoport

, Teres

, Lemeshow

A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care units: a multicenter inception cohort study.

Crit Care Med 1994; 22(9): 1385–91.

Becker

R.B.

, Zimmerman

J.E.

ICU scoring systems allow prediction of patient outcomes and comparisons of ICU performance.

Crit Care Clin 1996; 12(3): 503–14.

Sirio

C.A.

, Knaus

W.A.

Application of prognostic scoring in adult intensive care.

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 1990; 3: 241–4.

Apgar

A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant.

Anesth Analg 1953; 32: 260–7.

Knaus

W.A.

, Zimmerman

J.E.

, Wagner

D.P.

APACHE – acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system.

Crit Care Med 1981; 9(8): 591–7.

Knaus

W.A.

, Draper

E.A.

, Wagner

D.P.

APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Crit Care Med 1985; 13(10): 818–29.

10.

Knaus

W.A.

, Le Gall

J.R.

, Wagner

D.P.

A comparison of intensive care in the USA and France.

Lancet 1982; 2(8299): 642–6.

11.

T.E.

, Hutchinson

, Short

Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.

Crit Care Med 1993; 21(5): 698–705.

12.

Rowan

K.M.

, Kerr

J.H.

, Major

Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland – II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.

BMJ 1993; 307(6910): 977–981.

13.

Zimmerman

J.E.

, Knaus

W.A.

, Judson

J.A.

Patient selection for intensive care: A comparison of New Zealand and United States hospitals.

Crit Care Med 1998; 16: 318–26.

14.

Sirio

C.A.

, Tajimi

, Tase

An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States.

Crit Care Med 1992; 20(9): 1207–15.

15.

Chen

F.G.

, Koh

K.F.

, Goh

M.H.

Validation of APACHE II score in a surgical intensive care unit.

Singapore Med J 1993; 34(4): 322–4.

16.

Giangiuliani

, Mancini

, Gui

Validation of a severity of illness score (APACHE) in a surgical intensive unit.

Intensive Care Med 1989; 15(8): 519–22.

17.

Wong

D.T.

, Crofts

S.L.

, Gomes

Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients.

Crit Care Med 1995; 23(7): 1177–83.

18.

Knaus

W.A.

, Wagner

D.P.

, Draper

E.A.

The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.

Chest 1991; 100(6): 1619–36.

19.

Bastos

P.G.

, Knaus

W.A.

APACHE III study: a summary.

Intensive Care World 1991; 8(1): 35–8.