Assessing Student Kearning in Study-Abroad Programs

Abstract

Conventional wisdom dictates that international education promotes student development and the acquisition of worthwhile knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Accrediting agencies, however, demand concrete evidence to substantiate such claims. This article describes the development of a conceptual frame work and methodology for the academic assessment of student learning in study-abroad programs with reference to knowledge acquisition, skills acquisition, attitudinal development, and social development. Conceptually, the framework is derived from the developmental theory of Erik Erikson and the tax onomies of educational objectives developed by Benjamin Bloom and his associates. Methodologically focus groups are employed to generate assessment data, in a procedure akin to small-group instructional diagnosis (SGID). Based on data collected in two focus groups conducted as a pilot study, more narrowly circumscribed coding categories were constructed within the broader domains of cognitive learning, behavioral skills acquisition, affective learning, and social development. The responses of students in the two pilot groups suggest that educational gains in study-abroad programs occur primarily in the affective and social domains of learning, including values clarification, attitude change, personal development, and social maturity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, L. W. , & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds.) (1994a). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty year retrospective (Ninety third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Anderson, L. W. , & Sosniak, L. A. (1994b). Excerpts from the "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain." In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty year retrospective (Ninety third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II) (pp. 927). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Association of International Education Administrators (1995). A research agenda for the internationalization of higher education in the United States (Recommendations and report based on August 1011, 1995 meeting in Washington, D.C.). Pullman, WA: Author.

Bloom, B. S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty year retrospective (Ninety third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II) (pp. 18). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Bloom, B. S. , Engelhart, M. D. , Furst, E. J. , Hill, W. H. , & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Creed, T. (1996). Small group instructional diagnosis. In T. Creed, Opening doors: Two cases of formative assessment of teaching - A user's guide (chap. 11, pp. 41-47). St. Paul, MN: The Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching and Learning. (Chapter 11 is available online from The National Teaching & Learning Forum at http://www.ntlf.com/html/pi/9705/sgid.htm)

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton. (Originally published 1950)

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

Husen, T. (1994). International education. In T. Husen & T. N. Postleth-waite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education: Research and studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 2972-2978). Oxford: Elsevier.

10.

Institute of International Education (1996). Open doors, 1995/96. New York: Author.

11.

Krathwohl, D. R. , Bloom, B. S. , & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.

12.

Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

López, C. L. (1996, March). Opportunities for improvement: Advice from consultant evaluators on programs to assess student learning (Staff Paper). Chicago: North Central Accreditation Commission on Institutions of Higher Education.

14.

Rohrlich, B. , & Martin, J. N. (1991). Host country and reentry adjustment of student sojourners. International journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 163-182.

15.

Teichler, U. (1996). Research on academic mobility and international cooperation in higher education: An agenda for the future. In P. Blumenthal , C. Goodwin , A. Smith , & U. Teichler (Eds.), Academic mobility in a changing world: Regional and global trends (Higher education policy 29) (pp. 338-358). London: Jessica Kingsley.

16.

Van der Wende, M. (1994). Theoretical and methodological contributions of various disciplines to the study of the international dimension: Drawing on sciences of education as a theoretical and practical framework. In A. Smith , U. Teichler , & M. van der Wende (Eds.), The international dimension of higher education: Setting the research agenda (Proceedings of an international research workshop jointly sponsored by the Academic Cooperation Association and the International Research Centre for Cultural Studies, Vienna, 2930 April 1994) (pp. 102-114). Vienna: Internationales Forschungszentrum Kulturwis-senschaften.