The transposition of the Great Man into the Fittest Survivor is at the very root of an endemic interchange between the sciences and the arts in late Victorian culture, giving rich metaphoric substance to more heavily concretised scientific terminology. Herbert Spencer's famous phrase, “survival of the fittest” is, arguably, one of the most commonly transposed and consequently influential scientific expressions of the Victorian period, and as such, one of its most malleable idioms.
In Victorian musicology this influence is especially obvious in biographical works which privilege Richard Wagner as the greatest genius of musical history. Thus in Mezzotints in Modern Music (1899) James Huneker declares that “Wagner carried within his breast the precious eucharist of genius. ” It is the attitude of Huneker and like-minded musicologists, like C. Hubert H. Parry, William Wallace, Francis Hueffer and Richard Wallaschek, which forms the basis of a three-part exploration of Wagner's genius, covering (1) the role of “endurance” in Victorian definitions of genius, from Carlyle and Sully to Galton; (2) the influence of German morphology on evolutionary terminology in Britain, with particular reference to ontogeny, phylogeny and recapitulation; and (3) Spencer's adaptation of German morphology and his influence on Victorian perceptions of Wagner's genius. These collectively argue through the paradigm of Wagner that the formulation of late Victorian musical genius was incomplete without recourse to evolutionary terminology of survival. Indeed, for Victorian musicology, Wagner, the Great Man, had evolved Into Wagner, the Fittest Survivor.
von BaerE. (1828). Ueber der Verhältniss der Formen, die das Individuum in den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung annimmt (part 5) of Ueber Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion.Konigsberg: Borntraeger, 1828-37.
5.
BarzunJ. (1941/1958). Darwin, Marx, Wagner: Critique of a heritage (2nd rev. edn). Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., Inc.
6.
BeerG. (1983/2002). Darwin's plots: Evolutionary narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and nineteenth-century fiction (2nd edn). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BowlerP. J. (2003). Evolution: The history of an idea (3rd edn). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
8.
BrownM. (1911). A day with Wagner.London: Hodder & Stoughton.
9.
CarlyleT. (1841/1908). Lecture 1, The hero as divinity. In On heroes, hero-worship, and the heroic in history.London: J. M. Dent, and New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., pp. 239–77.
10.
ChambersR. (1844). Vestiges of the natural history of creation.J. Churchill: London.
11.
CrookD. P. (1994). Darwinism, war and history.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DaleC. (2002). Music analysis in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain.Aldershot: Ashgate.
13.
DibbleJ. (1992). C. Hubert H. Parry: His life and music.Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
DibbleJ. (1999). Parry as historiographer. In ZonB. (ed). Nineteenth-century British music studies 1.Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 37–51.
15.
GaltonF. (July 1904). Eugenics: Its definition, scope, and aims. American Journal of Sociology, 10, 1–6.
16.
GaltonF. (1904). Eugenics. Its definition, scope and aims. Nature, 70, 82.
17.
GaltonF. (1869/1914). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
18.
GaltonF. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development.London: Macmillan.
19.
GemmillW. N. (May 1915). Genius and eugenics. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 6, 83–100.
20.
GoddardJ. (1896). The rise of music.London: William Reeves.
21.
Gode von AeschA. (1941). Natural science in German romanticism.New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
GouldS. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
GrayC. (1928). The history of music.London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., and New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
24.
GurneyE. (1880). The power of sound.London: Smith, Elder & Co.
25.
HadowW. H. (1893/1911). Studies in modern music: Hector Berlioz, Robert Schumann, Richard Wagner.London, Seeley and Co., Ltd.
26.
HaeckelE. (1910). The evolution of man: A popular scientific study (trans. Joseph McCabe), 2 vols. London: Watts & Co. for the Rationalist Press (translated from the 5th edn of Anthropogenie: Keimes- und Stammes-Geschichte des Menschen, Leipzig, 1903, originally published in 1874).
27.
HaeckelE. (1900). Riddle of the universe at the close of the nineteenth century (trans. Joseph McCabe). New York and London: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
28.
HirschN. D. M., (1931/1969). Genius and creative intelligence.New York: Philosophical Library.
29.
HoweM. J. A. (1999). Genius explained.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HuefferF. (1880). Richard Wagner and his “Ring of the Niblung”. In Francis Hueffer. Musical studies: A series of contributions.Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, pp. 130–78. (Reprinted from the New Quarterly Magazine, 4(April to July 1875), 159-86.
HuefferF. (1874). Richard Wagner and the music of the future: History and aesthetics.London: Chapman and Hall.
33.
HunekerJ. (1899). Mezzotints in modern music: Brahms, Tschaïkowsky, Chopin, Richard Strauss, Liszt and Wagner.New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
34.
HutcheonP. D. (1996). Leaving the cave: Evolutionary naturalism in social scientific thought.Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
35.
KnoxR. (1850). The races of men.London: H. Renshaw.
36.
LargeD. C., & WeberW. (1984). Wagnerism in European culture and politics.Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
37.
LidgeyC. A. (1904). Wagner.London: J. M. Dent & Co., and New York: E. P. Dutton.
38.
LosseffN., & FullerS. (eds) (2004). Music in Victorian fiction.Aldershot: Ashgate.
39.
LovejoyA. O. (1959). The argument for organic evolution before the Origin of species, 1830-1858. In GlassB., TemkinO., & StausW. L.Jr. (eds). Forerunners of Darwin: 1745-1859.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 356–414.
40.
LovejoyA. O. (1959). Schopenhauer as Evolutionist. In GlassB., TemkinO., & StrausW. L.Jr. (eds). Forerunners of Darwin: 1745-1859, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 415–37. (Reproduced from The Monist, 21, (1911), 195-222).
41.
LowinskyE. E. (July 1964). Music genius: Evolution and origins of a concept. Musical Quarterly, 50, 321–40.
42.
LyellC. (1837). Principles of geology: Being an inquiry how far the former changes of the Earth's surface are referable to causes now in operation, 2 vols. Philadelphia: J. Kay, Jr & Brother, Pittsburgh (1st American edn from the 5th and last London edn).
43.
MeckelJ. F. (1811). Entwurf einer Darstellung der zwischen dem Embryozustande der höheren Tiere und dem permanenten der niederen stattfindenen Parallele: Beyträge zur vergleicheneden Anatomie, vol. 2. Leipzig: Carl Heinrich Reclam.
44.
MooreG. (2002). Nietzsche, biology and metaphor.New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MuirT. (1997). Wagner in England: Four writers before Shaw. PhD diss., City University of New York.
46.
NewmanE. (1931). Fact and fiction about Wagner.London, Toronto, Melbourne and Sydney: Cassell.
47.
NichollsF. (Jan. 1924). Creative genius and appreciation. Music and Letters, 5, 76–78.
48.
OfferJ. (2000). Herbert Spencer: Critical assessments.London and New York; Routledge.
49.
PanchenA. L. (1992). Classification, evolution, and the nature of biology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
ParryC. H. H. (1893/1968). The evolution of the art of music.New York: Greenwood Press.
51.
ParryC. H. H. (1884). On some bearings of the historical method upon music. Proceedings of the Musical Association, 11, 1–17.
52.
ParryC. H. H. (1887). Studies of great composers.London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd; J. Curwen and Sons Ltd, and New York: E. P. Dutton and Co.
53.
PaulD. B. (Sept. 1988). The selection of the “survival of the fittest”. Journal of the History of Biology, 21, 411–24.
54.
PeelJ. D. Y. (1971). Herbert Spencer: The evolution of a sociobiologist.London: Heinemann.
55.
PowellB. (1855). Essays on the spirit of the inductive philosophy, the unity of worlds, and philosophy of creation.London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
56.
RichardsR. J. (2007). Karl Ernst von Baer. In RuseM. (ed). The Harvard companion to the history of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/Bibliography1.htm (accessed 15 February 2007).
57.
RileyI. W. (22 June 1905). Recent theories of genius. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 2, 345–52.
58.
RogersJ. A. (April 1972). Darwin and social Darwinism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 33, 265–80.
59.
RuncimanJ. F. (1908). Wagner.London: George Bell & Sons.
60.
SessaA. D. (1979). Richard Wagner and the English.Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
61.
SimontonD. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
SpencerH. (1971). Herbert Spencer: Structure, function and evolution (ed. and with an introductory essay by Stanislav Andreski). London: Michael Joseph.
63.
SpencerH. (1873). The study of sociology.London and New York: D. Appleton.
64.
SpencerH. (1852). Theory of population: Deduced from the general law of animal fertility. Westminster Review, 57, 468–501.
65.
SpencerH. (0000). Principles of sociology. A system of synthetic philosophy. Westminster edition. 2 vols. New York & London: Appleton & Co.
66.
SpitzerM. (2005). Tovey's evolutionary metaphors. Music Analysis, 24, 437–69.
67.
SteptoeA. (1998). Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament in the historical record.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68.
StittM. P. (1998). Metaphors of change in the language of nineteenth-century fiction: Scott, Gaskell, and Kingsley.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69.
SullyJ. (1884). Outlines of psychology, with special reference to the theory of education.London: Longmans, Green & Co.
70.
SuttonE. (2002). Aubrey Beardsley and British Wagnerism in the 1890s.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
TennysonA. L. (1893). Epilogue. In GrayE. (ed). In memoriam: Authoritative text criticism (Norton Critical Edition, 2nd edn). New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 2004.
72.
TurnbullR. (1907). Musical genius and religion.London: S. Wellwood.
73.
WagnerC. (1978). Cosima Wagner's diaries (ed. Martin Gregor-Dellin and trans. Dietrich Mack). London: Collins.
74.
WallaceW. (1914). The musical faculty: Its origins and processes.London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
75.
WallaceW. (1908). The threshold of music: An Inquiry into the development of the musical sense.London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
76.
WallaceW. (1925). Wagner as he lived.London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd; J. Curwen & Sons, Ltd.
77.
WallaschekR. (1893). Primitive music: An inquiry into the origin and development of music, songs, instruments, dances, and pantomimes of savage races.London and New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
78.
WeinerM. A. (1995). Richard Wagner and the anti-semitic imagination.Lincoln, NB and London: University of Nebraska Press.
79.
WilliamsS. (2004). Wagner and the romantic hero.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
YoungR. (1985). Darwin's metaphor: Nature's place in Victorian culture.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
ZonB. (2000). Music and metaphor in nineteenth-century British musicology.Aldershot: Ashgate.
