An integral component of public management reform in Korea has been e-government, a field in which Korea has been a pioneer and in which it is the world leader. This article examines the Korean model of public management reform in the context of the developmental state and democratisation to describe and explain the emergence and expansion of e-government practices. The growth of e-government is tracked and the crucial role of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security delineated. Also covered are Government for Citizens initiatives, the provision of particular services, the mushrooming use of smart phones and emerging patterns of citizen participation, especially as related to local-level governance. The article demonstrates how much can be achieved in e-government and provides a model from which other countries can choose appropriate practices.
BrandsenTKimS (2010) Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: a comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences76(2): 367–386.
2.
CarlsonMTurnerM (2009) Popular perceptions of political regimes in East and Southeast Asia. Democratization16(2): 377–398.
3.
ChoiJW (2009) Institutional structures and effectiveness of anticorruption agencies: a comparative analysis of South Korea and Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science17(2): 195–214.
4.
Division of Public Administration and Development Management (DPADM) (2007) Republic of Korea Country Administration Profile. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan023315.pdf (accessed 7 November 2013).
5.
HaYJooJKangM. (2009) Social conflicts and policy-making in Korea: interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences75(4): 665–685.
6.
HolzerMManoharanA (2012) Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide (2011–12) Fifth Global E-Governance Survey: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Websites throughout the World. Newark, NJ: National Center for Public Performance.
7.
International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (2012) Measuring the Information Society 2012. Geneva: ITU, pp. 21.
8.
Interview with second senior MOPAS official, June2012, conducted by O’DonnellM.
9.
Interview with senior MOPAS official, June2012, conducted by O’DonnellM.
10.
JangJShinD (2008) Democratizing economic policymaking in South Korea: painfully slow progress toward an executive-legislative balance of power. International Review of Public Administration13(1): 59–71.
11.
JhoW (2005) Challenges for e-governance: protests from civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences71(1): 155–166.
12.
JunJKimT (2002) Distrust as a hindrance to democratic governance in South Korea. Asian Journal of Political Science10(1): 1–16.
13.
JunJParkM (2001) Crisis and organisational paralysis: the lingering problem of Korean public administration. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management9(1): 3–13.
14.
KimC-Y (2005) The Korean economic crisis and coping strategies in the health sector: pro-welfarism or neoliberalism?International Journal of Health Services35(3): 561–578.
15.
KimP (2000) Administrative reform in the Korean central government: a case study of the Dae Jung Kim’s Administration. Asian Review of Public Administration12(2): 81–95.
16.
KimS (2010) Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: does the rise of critical citizens matter?Public Administration Review70(5): 801–810.
17.
KimS (2012) ‘Contentious Democracy’ in South Korea: an active civil society and ineffectual political parties. Taiwan Journal of Democracy8(2): 51–61.
18.
KwonSO’DonnellM (2001) The Chaebol and Labour: The Development of Management Strategy in Hyundai. London: Routledge.
19.
LeeH (2008) The Study on the Role of Confucian Culture for East Asian Economic Development - Focused on Korean Economic Development. International Association of Area Studies12(1): 165-191.
QuahJST (2003) Curbing Corruption in Asia: A Comparative Study of Six Countries. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
23.
QuahJ (2007) Anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries: a comparative analysis. International Public Management Review8(2): 73–96.
24.
RoC-H (1993) Public Administration and the Korean Transformation: Concepts, Policies, and Value Conflicts. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
25.
United Nations (2012) United Nations E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People. New York: United Nations.
26.
WongJ (2004) The adaptive developmental state in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies4(2): 345–362.
27.
YouJS (2009) Is South Korea succeeding in controlling corruption?Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3–6 September.
