See generally ZinnHoward, ‘Law and Justice’ in ZinnHoward, The Zinn Reader: Writings on Disobedience and Democracy, Seven Stories Press, 1997, pp.367–402.
3.
Manning Clark quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, (1988) 154Recorder8, 8.
4.
Justice Michael Kirby quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, above, ref 3, 8.
5.
FrickeGraham L., ‘The Eureka Trials’ (1997) 71Australian Law Journal59, 61.
6.
TwainMark quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, above, ref 3, 8.
7.
‘Eureka Stockade: Its Place In Our History’ (1984) 131Recorder14, 14.
8.
LalorPeter, ‘Statement to the Colonists of Victoria’, Argus (Melbourne), 10 April 1855.
9.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 61; KercherBruce, An Unruly Child: A History of Law in Australia, 1995, p.131.
10.
Lalor, above, ref 8.
11.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 61. There is an instructive contemporary parallel with the correlation between police promotions and infringement notices issued by officers.
12.
Lalor, above, ref 8.
13.
RaffaelloCarboni, The Eureka Stockade, first published 1855, 2nd edition1947, p.36.
14.
RossR. S., Eureka: Freedom's Fight of '54, 1914, p.197.
15.
Lalor, above, ref 8; Fricke, above, ref 5, 61; Kercher, above, ref 9, p.131. See also TwainMark quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, above, ref 3, 8.
16.
‘Hotham Declares Martial Law at Ballarat’, Argus (Melbourne), 5 December 1854; ‘130 Diggers Stand Trial’, Argus (Melbourne), 6 December 1854; SmithRussell, ‘The Eureka State Treason Trials: Thirteen Men, Goode and True’ [1980] Summons16, 18.
17.
WalsheR.O., The Eureka Stockade 1854–1954, 1954, p.25.
PhillipsJustice John H., ‘The Eureka Advocates’ (Pt 1) (1990) 64Australian Law Journal211, 211. See also MolonyJohn, Eureka, 1984, p.189.
20.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 61.
21.
Raffaello, above, ref 13, p.113.
22.
Smith, above, ref 16, 18.
23.
Frost's Case (1839) 173 ER 771 (Tindal CJ).
24.
Phillips, above, ref 19, 211.
25.
MichieArchibald (lead counsel for Read, Campbell, Molloy, Sorenson and Phelan) quoted in ‘Verdicts are Returned’, The Argus (Melbourne), 28 March 1855.
26.
TrialsState Victoria, 1855, R v Hayes, 55.
27.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 62; SharwoodRobin L., ‘The Local Courts on Victoria's Gold Fields, 1855 to 1857’ (1986) 15Melbourne University Law Review508, 509–10.
28.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 62.
29.
FordeJohn, The Story of the Bar of Victoria, 1910, p.139.
30.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 62.
31.
PhillipsJustice John H., ‘As Witty as Sheridan’ (1992) 16 Criminal Law Journal55, 55.
32.
Phillips, above, ref 31, 55–6.
33.
Smith, above, ref 16, 20.
34.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 65–6.
35.
Ricke, above, ref 5, 66.
36.
‘Trial Verdict Returned’, Age (Melbourne), 24 February 1855.
37.
Editorial, Age (Melbourne), 24 February 1855.
38.
‘Verdict Announced’, Argus (Melbourne), 24 February 1855; Fricke, above, ref 5, 66; Smith, above, ref 16, 20; ‘They Could Have Been Executed’ (1988) 154Recorder17, 17.
39.
Editorial, Argus (Melbourne), 27 February 1855.
40.
ManningJohn, ‘Original Correspondence’, Age (Melbourne), 27 February 1855.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 69. The system of jury trial was adopted in Victoria in 1851: Fricke, above, ref 5, 60.
56.
Manning, above, ref 40.
57.
Ross, above, ref 14, p.8.
58.
Ross, above, ref 14, p.131.
59.
Molony, above, ref 19, p.190.
60.
Ross, above, ref 14, p.131.
61.
Ross, above, ref 14, p.135.
62.
Editorial, Ballarat Times (Ballarat), 28 October 1854.
63.
Editorial, Ballarat Times (Ballarat), 28 October 1854.
64.
Phillips, above, ref 19, 211; PhillipsJustice John H., ‘The Eureka Advocates’ (Pt 2) (1990) 64Australian Law Journal290, 290; PhillipsJustice John H., ‘The Eureka Advocates’ (Pt 3) (1990) 64Australian Law Journal311, 311.
65.
Ross, above, ref 14, p.143.
66.
Fricke, above, ref 5, 59.
67.
Raffaello, above, ref 13, p.167.
68.
‘The Approaching Trials — Capital Punishment’, The Argus (Melbourne), 12 January 1855.
69.
Raffaello, above, ref 13, p.164.
70.
MildrenJohn quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, above, ref 3, 9.
71.
Serle, above, ref 48, p.171.
72.
Lalor, above, ref 8.
73.
MarxKarl quoted in ‘Eureka Means Different Things to Different People’, above, ref 3, 9.
74.
Cheng v The Queen [2000] HCA 53 (5 October 2000), para 80 (GaudronJ), para 245 (KirbyJ); Brown v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 171, 197 (BrennanJ); Li Chia Hsing v Rankin (1978) 141 CLR 182, 198 (MurphyJ); Apprendi v New Jersey 68 USLW 4576, 4579 (2000) (StevensScaliaSouterThomas and GinsburgJJ).
75.
Quoted in Zinn, above, ref 2, p.402.
76.
Bertrand Russell quoted in Chomsky, above, ref 1, p.398.