Counter-Terrorism Laws Threaten Fundamental Democratic Rights

Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 13 March 2002 at <http://www.abc.net.au/news/politics/2002/03/item20020312235919_1.html> accessed 13M arch 2002.

Slipper P. , Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Finance and Administration, Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 13 March 2002, p.1042 and Williams D. , press releases, 'Australia's National Security, 18 September 2001, 'Australia Well Prepared, 2 November 2001, 'Upgrading Australia's Counter-Terrorism Capabilities, 18 December 2001, ‘Indian Authorities’, 7 February 2002.

See generally, Bronitt S. and Ayers M. , ‘Criminal Law and Human Rights’, in Kinley D. (ed.), Human Rights in Australian Law, Federation Press, Sydney, 1998.

Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration (1992) 176 CLR 1.

See Chaaya M. , ‘The Right to Silence Reignited: Vulnerable Suspects, Police Questioning and Law and Order in NSW’, (1998) 22 Criminal Law Journal 82.

Williams D. , ‘ASIO Legislation Amendment Bill introduced’, news release, 21 March 2002, <http://www.ag.gov.au/aghome/agnews/2002newsag/32_02.htm> accessed 22 March 2002.

See generally, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth).

See, Hocking J. , Beyond Terrorism, The Development of the Australian Security State, Allen & Unwin, Sydney 1993, Chapter 8.

Hocking J. , above, ref 8; Lee H. Hanks P. and Morabito V. , In the Name of National Security, The Legal Dimensions, LBC, Sydney, 1995, Chapter 3.

Proposed Criminal Code Act 1995, s.100.1 (Cth).

Criminal Code ss.101.2, 101.4, 101.5, 101.6.

Criminal Code s.100.1

See, Bailey P. , Human Rights: Australia in an International Context, Butterworths, Sydney, 1990, pp.296–7 and Hiller A. , Public Order and the Law, LBC, Sydney, 1983.

See, Davids Distribution Pty Ltd v National Union of Workers (1999) 165 ALR 550 and Howe J. , ‘Picketing and the Statutory Definition of “Industrial Action”’, (2000) 13 Australian Journal of Labour Law, pp.84–91.

Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Reference: Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill and related bills, 8 April 2002, p.19.

Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, above, ref 15, pp.14–15.

See, Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Report on Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2002 [No. 2] and Related Bills, May 2002, p.34. For a further comparison of the US and British legislation, see Hancock N. , Terrorism and the Law in Australia: Supporting Materials, Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Library, Research Paper No.13, 2001–2002, pp.2–8.

Criminal Code s.80.1.

Criminal Code s.80.1 (2).

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, above, ref 15, p.12.

See, Molomby T. , Spies, Bombs and the Path of Bliss, Potoroo Press, Sydney, 1986, and Hocking J. , above, ref 8, Chapters 5–7.

Hancock N. , above, ref 17, Note 42, p.16.

Criminal Code s.90.1.

Criminal Code s.91.1.

See, Head M. , ‘Australian government launches new attacks on free speech’, <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/feb2002/law-f15.shtml> accessed 19 April 2002.

See, Head M. , ‘Leaked spy intercepts prove Australian complicity in Timor massacre’, <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/mar2002/timo-m25.shtml> accessed 19 April 2002.

Criminal Code s.93.2.

Criminal Code s.102.2(1) (a) and (b).

Criminal Code s.102.1.

See, Hocking J. , above, ref 8, Chapters 5–7.

Criminal Code s.102.2(1) (d).

See, Church of Scientology v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25 and Lee Hanks and Morabito , above, ref 9, Chapters 1–2.

The Collins English Dictionary, 2nd edn, Sydney, 2001.

Submissions to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee for the Committee's Inquiry into the Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill and Related Bills, Vol. 1, p.37.

Submissions , above, ref 34, p.162.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, above, ref 15, pp.18–19.

Andrews J. , ‘US indicts Sheik Rahman's lawyer, escalating government attack on democratic rights’, <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/apr2002/stew-a11.shtml> accessed 19 April 2002.

Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1950) 83 CLR 1.

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s.30A.

Hancock N. , Terrorism and the Law in Australia: Legislation, Commentary and Constraints, Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Library, Research Paper No. 12 2001–2002, p.7.

Crimes Act s.30AA.

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s.19B.

See generally, Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Bill 2002 (Cth).

See generally, Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Bill 2002 (Cth).

Charter of the United Nations (Anti-Terrorism Measures) Regulations 2001 and Downer A. and Williams D. , Joint Media Release, ‘Further Steps to Prevent the Financing of Terrorism’, 18 April 2002.

See generally, Border Security Legislation Amendment Bill 2002 (Cth).

Criminal Code Amendment (Anti-hoax and Other Measures) Act 2002 (Cth).

See, Williams D. and Ellison C. , Joint News Release, ‘2002–03 Budget: Law and Justice Overview’, <http://law.gov.au/publications/budget2003/mediareleases/budgetoverview.htm> accessed 16 May 2002. See also, Lawson D. , ‘The Government Goes to War’, (2001) 55 Arena Magazine, pp.43–4.

See, Head M. , ‘The Military Call-out Legislation — Some Legal and Constitutional Questions’, (2001) 29 Federal Law Review, pp.273–94.

Williams D. , News Release, ‘Air Security Officers’, 18 December 2001.

See, Intelligence Services Act 2000, ss.14, 15.

See, Sun-Herald, 30 September 2001, p.1.

See, Head M. , ‘US terror attacks used to introduce sweeping police powers’, World Socialist Web Site, <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/how-o04_prn.shtml> accessed 15 April 2002.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Information Package for the Committee's Inquiry into the Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2002 [No. 2] and Related Bills, p.46.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, above, ref 54, p.48.

See, Head M. , ‘Military Call-out Legislation’.

See, Banham C. , ‘Stalemate on revised terrorism package’, Sydney Morning Herald, 17 May 2002, p.4.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Report, above, ref 17, note 52, pp.26–8.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Report, above, ref 17, pp.20–1.

Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee, Report, above, ref 17, p.20.

See, World Socialist Web Site Editorial Board, ‘Cover-up and conspiracy: The Bush administration and September 11’, <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/may2002/bush-m18.shtml> accessed 20 May 2002.

See, Submissions, above, ref 34, p.245.