See generally MakkaiT., ‘Drug Courts: Issues and Prospects’ (1998) 95Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice; MakkaiT., ‘The Emergence of Drug Treatment Courts in Australia’, (2002) Journal of Substance Misuse and Use (forthcoming); FreibergA., ‘Australian Drug Courts’ (2000) 24Criminal Law Journal213.
2.
GriffithG., Police Powers and Drug Law Enforcement in New South Wales, 2001.
3.
FreibergA., ‘Problem-oriented Courts: Innovative Solutions to Intractable Problems?’ (2001) 11Journal of Judicial Administration8.
4.
FreibergA., ‘Problem-oriented Courts: Innovative Solutions to Intractable Problems?’ (2001) 11Journal of Judicial Administration8.
5.
Victorian Drug Policy Expert Committee, Meeting the Challenge, Melbourne, 2000.
6.
Victorian Drug Policy Expert Committee, Meeting the Challenge, Melbourne, 2000, p.150.
7.
HealeP. and LangE., ‘A Process Evaluation of the CREDIT (Court Referral and Evaluation for Drug Intervention and Treatment) Pilot Program’ (2001) 20Drug and Alcohol Review223, 224.
8.
FreibergA., Sentencing Review: Drug Courts and Related Sentencing Options, Department of Justice, Victoria, 2001, pp.1–48.
9.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals in the United States, Articles of Association, Article 2; HoraP.SchmaW.G. and RosenthalJ.T.A., ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System's Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America’ (1999) 74Notre Dame Law Review439; InciardiJ.McBrideD. and RiversJ., Drug Control and the Courts, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, 1996; TauberJ., ‘Drug Courts: A Judicial Manual’ (1994) California Center for Judicial Education and Research Journal3.
10.
United States Department of Justice, Drug Courts Program Office, Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components, 1997, pp.7 and 9.
TauberJ., ‘Drug Courts: A Judicial Manual’ (1994) California Center for Judicial Education and Research Journal3.
19.
MarloweD.B., and KirbyK.C., ‘Effective Use of Sanctions in Drug Courts: Lessons from Behavioral Research’, (1999) 2National Drug Court Institute Review1; SatelS.L., ‘Observational Study of Courtroom Dynamics in Selected Drug Courts’ (1998) 1National Drug Court Institute Review43.
20.
Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), ss.18ZJ and 18ZL.
21.
Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s.18ZN.
22.
FreemanK., New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: Health, Well-Being and Participant Satisfaction, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 2002; FreemanK.KarskiR.L., and DoakP., New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: Program and Participant Profiles, Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 50, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 2000; TaplinS., The New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: A Process Evaluation, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 2002.
23.
‘Drug Court of New South Wales Review Committee Report’, Sydney, 2000.
24.
TaplinS., above, ref 22, p.65.
25.
Drug Court of New South Wales Review Committee Report, Sydney, 2000, para 9.2; TaplinS., above, ref 22, p.50.
26.
First National Drug Treatment Court Workshop, Toronto Drug Treatment Court, September 2001.
27.
Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s.18ZK.
28.
Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s.18ZN.
29.
Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), s.18ZP.
30.
BelenkoS., Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review, The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, Columbia University, 2001, p.9.
31.
Personal Communication, FeneleyJohn, Attorney-General's Department, New South Wales, March 2002.
32.
LindB., New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: Cost-Effectiveness, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 2002, p.63.
