Compare, for example, GansJeremyPalmerAndrew, Uniform Evidence (2010); HunterCameronHenning, above n 6; HunterJillCroninKathryn, Evidence, Advocacy and Ethical Practice: A Criminal Trial Commentary (1995); LigertwoodAndrewEdmondGary, Australian Evidence: A principled approach to the common law and the uniform Acts (5th ed, 2010); KumarMiikoOdgersStephenPedenElisabeth, Uniform Evidence Law: Commentary and Materials (3rd ed, 2009); AndersonJohnBaynePeter, Uniform Evidence Law: Text and Essential Cases (2nd ed, 2009); and WaightP KWilliamsC R, Evidence: Commentary and Materials (7th ed, 2006).
9.
CookeMichael, Indigenous Interpretation Issues for Courts (2002); CookeMichael, ‘Understood by All Concerned? Anglo/Aboriginal Legal Translation’ in MorrisMarshall (ed), Translation and the Law (1995).
10.
EadesDiana, Aboriginal English and the Law: Communicating with Aboriginal English Speaking Clients: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners (1992); HunterCronin, above n 8, 250–1; McRae, above n 1, 373.
11.
HunterCronin, above n 8, 251, 307–9.
12.
Ibid251, 308. See also EadesDiana, ‘Understanding Aboriginal silence in legal contexts’ in KotthoffHelgaSpencer-OateyHelen (eds), Handbook of Intercultural Communication (2007) 285–301; EadesDiana, ‘Telling and Retelling Your Story in Court: Questions, Assumptions and Intercultural Implications’ (2008) 20(2) Current Issues in Criminal Justice209, 219–220.
13.
See Eades (2008), Ibid.
14.
See StrehlowT G H, Songs of Central Australia (1971); InglisKen, The Stuart Case (1961).
15.
MildrenJustice Dean, ‘Redressing the imbalance against Aboriginals in the criminal justice system’ (1997) 21(1) Criminal Law Journal 7.
16.
See McRae, above n 1, 371–2; HunterCronin, above n 8, 459–460; HeydonJ D, Cross on Evidence (8th Aust. ed, 2010) at [33745].
17.
R v Anunga (1976) 11ALR412; but see also R v Anderson (1991) 105FLR25; R v Butler (No 1) (1991) 57 A Crim R 451; R v Ninnal (1992) 109FLR203; R v Echo (1997) 6NTLR51; but see also Dumoo v Gardner (1998) 7 NTLR 129.
18.
29 November 1993, CA Qld, unreported.
19.
HunterCameronHenning, above n 6, 1279.
20.
See, for instance, EadesDiana, ‘Legal recognition of cultural differences in communication: The case of Robyn Kina’ (1996) 16(3) Language and Communication215–227.
21.
McRae, above n 1, 545–7.
22.
(2001) 206 CLR 650.
23.
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW and other uniform jurisdictions) s 55.
24.
BiberKatherine, Captive Images: Race, Crime, Photography (2007); EdmondGary, ‘Law's Looking Glass: Expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images’ (2009) 20(3) Current Issues in Criminal Justice337.
25.
Mack, above n 7, 60.
26.
Ibid61.
27.
Ibid59.
28.
Ibid65.
29.
Biber, above n 24. See also BiberKatherine, ‘The spectre of crime: Photography, law and ethics’ (2006) 16(1) Social Semiotics133; BiberKatherine, ‘The Hooded Bandit: Aboriginality, Photography and Criminality in Smith v The Queen’ (2002) 3(3) Current Issues in Criminal Justice286.
30.
PalmerAndrew, ‘A Proof-oriented Model of Evidence Teaching’ (2002) 13Legal Education Review109, 117.
31.
See, for example, Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulations 2005 (NSW) Reg 24(d) and subsequent provisions.
32.
Australian Law Reform Commission, Review of the Uniform Evidence Acts, ALRC Discussion Paper 69 (2005).
33.
Australian Law Reform Commission, Uniform Evidence Laws, ALRC Report 102, Final Report (2005).
34.
Ibid [5.14].
35.
Ibid [5.15].
36.
Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) FLR 141, 171; De Rose v South Australia [2002] FCA 1342, [252].
37.
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW and other uniform jurisdictions) s 29.
38.
Section 29(2). In jurisdictions that already had the uniform Acts in force, the amendment commenced in 2009. In Victoria, the Act commenced operating in 2010.
39.
It should be noted that, prior to the amendments, the Evidence Acts already contained a power for a judge to control the questioning of witnesses: s 26, and so the amendment to s 29 supplements that power, and draws specific attention to questioning in ‘narrative form’. See Eades (2008), above n 12.
40.
Australian Law Reform Commission, The Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws, ALRC Report 31, Final Report (1986).
41.
ALRC Report 102, above n 33, [19.11].
42.
In jurisdictions where the Evidence Act was already operating, the new provisions commenced in 2009; in Victoria the Act commenced operating in 2010.
43.
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW and other uniform jurisdictions) s 128(1). The Dictionary of the Evidence Act defines ‘Australian law’ to mean ‘a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory’, and cl.9 of Part 2 of the Dictionary further states: ‘(1) A reference in this Act to a law of the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or a foreign country is a reference to a law (whether written or unwritten) of or in force in that place. (2) A reference in this Act to an Australian law is a reference to an Australian law (whether written or unwritten) of or in force in Australia’.