Petty & Maiden v R (1991) 173 CLR 95; HockingBarbara and ManvilleLaura, ‘What of the Right to Silence: Still Supporting the Presumption of Innocence, or a Growing Legal Fiction?’ (2001) IMacquarie Law lournal63.
5.
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 20(2); Evidence Act 1906 (WA), s 8(1)(c); Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic), s 41; cf. Evidence Act 1977 (Qld), ss 8(1), 10(2) and 15(2).
6.
Rv Baden-Clay [2014] QSC 154.
7.
R v Baden-Clay [2015] QCA 265.
8.
R v Baden Clay (2016) 334 ALR 234.
9.
SBS News, above n 3.
10.
Woon v R (1964) 109 CLR 529; cited by Weissensteiner v R (1993) 178 CLR 217, [30].
11.
X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92; Leev New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196.
12.
X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92.
13.
Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82; R v Hillier (2007) 228 CLR 618.
14.
R v Baden-Clay [2015] QCA 265, 48.
15.
R v Baden-Clay, (2016) 334 ALR 234 [31].
16.
Suttor v Gundowda (1950) 81 CLR 418; Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491.
17.
Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491, 60–62.
18.
R v Baden-Clay, (2016) 334 ALR 234 [57].
19.
Ibid [58].
20.
PalmerAndrew, ‘Silence in Court – The Evidential Significance of an Accused Person's Failure to Testify’ (1995) 18(1) UNSW Law Journal130, 130.
21.
(1991) 173 CLR 95.
22.
R v Baden-Clay, (2016) 334 ALR 234 [57].
23.
BabbLloyd SC, The Right to Silence, Silence as Evidence, Weissensteiner's Case and the Rule in Jones v Dunkel’ (Speech delivered at the University of Wollongong, 27 April 2012).
