Restrictive interventions (seclusion, physical restraint, and use of acute/p.r.n. sedation) may have negative effects on patients. Identifying factors associated with use of restrictive interventions and examining their effect on admission outcomes is important for optimising inpatient psychiatric care.
Methods:
This study documented use of restrictive interventions within a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit for 15 months. Two models examined predictors of use of restrictive interventions: (i) incident characteristics; and (ii) patient characteristics. The relationship between use of restrictive interventions and global clinical outcomes was also examined.
Results:
Of 134 patients admitted during the study period (61.9% female, mean age=13.8±2.9 years), 26.9% received at least one restrictive intervention. Incident factors associated with restrictive interventions were: physical aggression, early admission stage, and occurrence in private space. Patient factors that predicted use of restrictive interventions were developmental disorder and younger age. Use of restrictive interventions was not associated with increased length of stay or diminished improvement in global symptom ratings.
Conclusions:
Further research is needed to identify best practice in children at high risk for receiving restrictive interventions.
DeanAJMcDermottBMMarshallRT. Psychotropic medication utilization in a child and adolescent mental health service. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol2006; 16: 273–285.
2.
MastersKJBellonciCBernetW. Practice parameter for the prevention and management of aggressive behavior in child and adolescent psychiatric institutions, with special reference to seclusion and restraint. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2002; 41: 4S-25S.
3.
BarnettSRdosReisSRiddleMA. Improving the management of acute aggression in state residential and inpatient psychiatric facilities for youths. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2002; 41: 897–905.
4.
National Mental Health Working Group. National safety priorities in mental health: a national plan for reducing harm. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia: Health Priorities and Suicide Prevention Branch, Department of Health and Ageing, 2005.
5.
National Mental Health Performance Subcommittee. Implementing National Mental Health Key Performance Indicators in Australian States and Territories. National Mental Health Strategy 2011, www.health.gov.au/mhsc (accessed 11 April 2014)
GaskinCJElsomSJHappellB. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: Review of the literature. Br J Psychiatry2007; 191: 298–303.
8.
DelaneyKR. Evidence base for practice: Reduction of restraint and seclusion use during child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs2006; 3: 19–30.
9.
DeanAJScottJMcDermottBM. Changing utilization of pro re nata (‘as needed’) sedation in a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2009; 43: 360–365.
10.
SouranderAEllilaHValimakiM. Use of holding, restraints, seclusion and time-out in child and adolescent psychiatric in-patient treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry2002; 11: 162–167.
11.
GarrisonWTEckerBFriedmanM. Aggression and counteraggression during child psychiatric hospitalization. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1990; 29: 242–250.
12.
GorenSSinghNNBestAM. The aggression-coercion cycle: Use of seclusion and restraint in a child psychiatric hospital. J Child Fam Stud1993; 2: 61–73.
13.
CrockerJHStargattRDentonC. Prediction of aggression and restraint in child inpatient units. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2010; 44: 443–449.
14.
MohrWKPettiTAMohrBD. Adverse effects associated with physical restraint. Can J Psychiatry2003; 48: 330–337.
15.
PatersonBBradleyPStarkC. Deaths associated with restraint use in health and social care in the UK. The results of a preliminary survey. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs2003; 10: 3–15.
16.
PrinsenEJvan DeldenJJ. Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?J Med Ethics2009; 35: 69–73.
17.
DeanAJDukeSGGeorgeM. Behavioral management leads to reduction in aggression in a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2007; 46: 711–720.
18.
DeanAJDukeSGScottJ. Physical aggression during admission to a child and adolescent inpatient unit: Predictors and impact on clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2008; 42: 536–543.
19.
DeanAJGibbonPMcDermottBM. Exposure to aggression and the impact on staff in a child and adolescent inpatient unit. Arch Psychiatr Nurs2010; 24: 15–26.
20.
DeanAJMcDermottBMMarshallRT. PRN Sedation-patterns of prescribing and administration in a child and adolescent mental health inpatient service. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry2006; 15: 277–281.
21.
GowersSGHarringtonRCWhittonA. Brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). Br J Psychiatry1999; 174: 413–416.
22.
MartinAFawcettBLeeT. Seclusion and restraint “one-hour rule”. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2004; 43: 1322–1324.
23.
FryerMABeechMByrneGJ. Seclusion use with children and adolescents: An Australian experience. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2004; 38: 26–33.
24.
SwadiHBobierC. Lessons from an investigation of seclusion at an older adolescent inpatient unit. Australas Psychiatry2012; 20: 98–101.
25.
BaezaICorrellCUSaitoE. Frequency, characteristics and management of adolescent inpatient aggression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol2013; 23: 271–281.
ScottJGDeanA. Tailoring seclusion policies to the patient group. Br J Psychiatry2008; 192: 232.
28.
KozubMLSkidmoreR. Least to most restrictive interventions. A continuum for mental health care facilities. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv2001; 39: 32–38.
29.
GreeneRWAblonJSMartinA. Innovations: Child & adolescent psychiatry: Use of collaborative problem solving to reduce seclusion and restraint in child and adolescent inpatient units. Psychiatr Serv2006; 57: 610–612.
30.
MartinAKriegHEspositoF. Reduction of restraint and seclusion through collaborative problem solving: A five-year prospective inpatient study. Psychiatr Serv2008; 59: 1406–1412.
