Abstract
Objective:
Regina v Presser [1958] VR 45, is the most seminal case regarding fitness to plead for accused persons in Australia and New Zealand. It is not widely understood that Presser was a 14-year-old boy with intellectual disability. We aim to describe a clearer narrative regarding Edward John Presser.
Method:
Review of attainable newspaper reports framed within an historical context of fitness and relevant case law.
Results:
Presser’s narrative is described in greater detail than previously understood by clinicians and lawyers. Ramifications for fitness assessment are discussed including doli incapax and human rights considerations.
Conclusions:
The Presser criteria are widely applied; however, the case involved a 14-year-old boy with intellectual disability. Greater awareness of Presser’s narrative assists clinicians providing expert evidence regarding fitness to plead for adolescents and persons with intellectual disability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.