Navigating the social synapse: the neurobiology of bedside manner

Abstract

Objectives:

This paper seeks to explore the application of neurobiology to further understanding the importance of developing, refining and modelling good bedside manner in psychiatry. The concept of a social synapse is used as a framework to understand the impact of verbal and non-verbal information that crosses between two attuned individuals. Research shows that widely distributed cortical and subcortical networks are involved in processing of social information and the perception of safety.

Conclusions:

Good bedside manner is proposed as the ability of a clinician to navigate the social synapse and make a patient feel at ease. Findings from neurobiology suggest that good bedside manner needs to be a more considered component of effective psychiatric health care.

Keywords

bedside manner therapeutic engagement neurobiology empathy social synapse

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Person

Finch

Bedside manner: concept analysis and impact on advanced nursing practice. Internet J Adv Nurs Practice 2009; 10: 1–6.

Moore

Adler

Robertson

PA.

Medical malpractice. West J Med 2000; 173: 244.

Zolnierek

KBH

DiMatteo

. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care 2009; 47: 826.

Stewart

MA.

Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995; 152: 1423.

Cozolino

The neuroscience of human relationships: attachment and the developing social brain. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company, 2014.

Adolphs

The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 231–239.

LeDoux

Fear and the brain: where have we been, and where are we going?

Biol Psych 1998; 44: 1229–1238.

Adolphs

Tranel

Damasio

AR.

The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 1998; 393: 470–474.

Winston

Strange

O’Doherty

et al . Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neurosci 2002; 5: 277–283.

10.

Hari

Kujala

MV.

Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol Rev 2009; 89: 453–479.

11.

Porges

SW.

The polyvagal theory: phylogenetic contributions to social behavior. Physiol Behav 2003; 79: 503–513.

12.

MacDonald

Patient-clinician eye contact: social neuroscience and art of clinical engagement. Postgrad Med 2009; 121: 136–144.

13.

Calder

Lawrence

Keane

et al . Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 1129–1138.

14.

Riess

Biomarkers in the psychotherapeutic relationship: the role of physiology, neurobiology, and biological correlates of EMPATHY. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2011; 19: 162–174.

15.

Calvo

Nummenmaa

Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. J Exp Psychol-Gen 2008; 137: 471.

16.

O’Doherty

Dayan

Friston

et al . Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron 2003; 38: 329–337.

17.

Todorov

Pakrashi

Oosterhof

NN.

Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Soc Cogn 2009; 27: 813–833.

18.

Silverman

Physician behaviour and bedside manners: the influence of William Osler and The John Hopkins School of Medicine. Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center) 2012; 25(1): 58.

19.

Adler

HM.

The sociophysiology of caring in the doctor-patient relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 883–890.

20.

Stewart

Lewis

Heilman

et al . The covariation of acoustic features of infant cries and autonomic state. Physiol Behav 2013; 120: 203–210

21.

Geller

Porges

SW.

Therapeutic presence: neurophysiological mechanisms mediating feeling safe in therapeutic relationships. J Psychother Integr 2014; 24: 178.

22.

Marci

Orr

SP.

The effect of emotional distance on psychophysiologic concordance and perceived empathy between patient and interviewer. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2006; 31: 115–128.

23.

Schulte-Rüther

Markowitsch

Fink

et al . Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy. J Cognitive Neurosci 2007; 19: 1354–1372.

24.

Carr

Iacoboni

Dubeau

et al . Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003; 100: 5497–5502.

25.

Decety

The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Dev Neurosci 2010; 32: 257–267.

26.

Schore

AN.

Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company, 2003.

27.

Stern

DN.

The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company, 2004.

28.

Hasson

Ghazanfar

Galantucci

et al . Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16: 114–121.

29.

Stephens

Silbert

Hasson

Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010; 107: 14425–14430.

30.

McFarland

DH.

Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 128–143.

31.

Uvnas-Moberg

Physiological and endocrine effects of social contact. Ann. NY Acad. Sci 1997; 807: 146–163.

32.

Evans

Steptoe

Social support at work, heart rate, and cortisol: a self-monitoring study. J Occup Health Psychol 2001; 6: 361.

33.

Schore

The right brain is dominant in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 2014; 51: 388.