Abstract
Objectives
To compare vascular risk factors among patients receiving maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) versus acute ECT, and to examine cognitive outcomes associated with M-ECT.
Methods
A retrospective, single-centre, matched case-control study was conducted using a regional Health Service ECT Register (2015–2023). Adults with DSM-5 mood disorders were included. 25 received ≥6 months of M-ECT and 37 received acute-only ECT. Frequency matching achieved similar age structure and sex distribution. Vascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction, smoking) and a composite “high vascular risk” score (≥2 factors) were compared using Fisher’s exact tests and logistic regression. Cognition was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline and longitudinally with linear mixed-effects models.
Results
High vascular risk was common in both groups (M-ECT 76%; acute-only 68%) without significant between-group difference, although dyslipidaemia was more prevalent in the M-ECT group (OR 5.52, 95% CI: 1.51–20.20; p = 0.049). Baseline MoCA was comparable (21.9 vs 22.1) and remained stable during M-ECT (mean change +0.92; 95% CI: −0.51 to +2.35). High vascular risk, not ECT group, predicted cognition (−4.64, 95% CI: −7.45 to −2.01; p = 0.002).
Conclusions
Cognitive performance remained stable during M-ECT. Lower scores were associated with vascular comorbidity, and the higher dyslipidaemia rate underscores the need for cardiometabolic and cognitive monitoring.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
