A Comparison of Three Models for the Simulation of Accidental Fires

Abstract

Assumptions made and results obtained when applying three fire modeling approaches to study three accidental fires that occurred in single-family dwellings are presented in this article. The modeling approaches used are: a simplified analytical model of fire growth, a zone model (CFAST), and a field model (FDS). The fires predicted are: a house fire of suspected initial location but of unknown ignition source, a small-apartment fire initiated by the ignition of a sofa, which extinguished due to oxygen depletion, and a one-story house fire started by a malfunctioning gas heater. The input to each model has been kept as independent as possible from the other models while consistent with the forensic evidence. The predictions from the models of the fires’ characteristics are analyzed in the context of the forensic evidence for each accidental fire to compare the models’ predictive capabilities. It is found that in spite of the differences in the sophistication of these three modeling approaches, the results are in relatively good agreement, particularly in the early stages of the fire. Simpler models can be used as a first step towards less approximate modeling or to confirm the order of magnitude of the results from more complex models. The results of this study can be used to reach conclusions about the complexity of the model required to describe a particular fire scenario.

Keywords

fire modeling analytical model CFAST FDS accidental fires fire investigation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mowrer, F. W. , “The Right Tool for the Job,” Fire Protection Engineering Magazine (SFPE), Vol. 13, Winter, 2002, pp. 39-45 .

Lawson, J. R. and Quintiere, J. G. , “Slide-Rule Estimates of Fire Growth,” National Bureau of Standards Report NBSIR 85-3196, 1985.

Alvares, N. and Fernandez-Pello, A. C. , “Fire Initiation and Spread in Overloaded Communication System Cable Trays,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, Vol. 21, No. 1-3, 2000, pp. 51-57 .

Olenick, S. M. and Carpenter, D. J. , “An Updated International Survey of Computer Models for Fire and Smoke,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering (SFPE), Vol. 13, No. 2, 2003, pp. 87-110 .

Mitler, H. E. and Rockett, J. A. , “User’s Guide to FIRST, a Comprehensive Single-Room Fire Model,” National Bureau of Standards Report NBSIR 87-3595, 1987.

Peacock, R. D. , Reneke, P. A. , Jones, W. W. , Bukowski, R. W. and Forney, G. , “A User’s Guide for FAST: Engineering Tools for Estimating Fire Growth and Smoke Transport,” National Institute of Standards and Technology , Special Publication 921, 2000.

Cox, G. and Kumar, S. , “Field Modelling of Fire in Forced Ventilated Enclosures,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 52, No. 1-3, 1987, pp. 7-24 .

Rubini, P. A. , “SOFIE: Simulation of Fires in Enclosures,” In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Melbourne, Australia, 1997.

McGrattan, K. B. , Baum, H. R. , Rehm, R. G. , Hamins, A. , Forney, G. P. , Floyd, J. E. , Hostikka, S. and Prasad, K. , “Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 3) - User’s Guide,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NISTIR 6783, 2002.

10.

Emmons, H. W. , “Why Fire Model? The MGM Fire and Toxicity Testing,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1988, pp. 77-85 .

11.

Cox, G. , Chitty, R. and Kumar, S. , “Fire Modelling and the King’s Cross Fire Investigation,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1989, pp. 103-106 .

12.

Yan, Z. and Holmstedt, G. , “Investigation of the Dance Hall Fire in Gothenburg, October 1998 - A Comparison between Human Observations and CFD Simulation,” In: Conference Proceedings of the 7th Interflam, Interscience Communications Ltd, UK, 2001.

13.

McGrattan, K. B. and Bouldin, C. , “Simulating the Fires in the World Trade Center,” In: Conference Proceedings of the 10th Interflam, Vol. 2, Interscience Communications Ltd, UK, 2004, pp. 999-1008 .

14.

Floyd, J. E. , “Comparison of CFAST and FDS for Fire Simulation With the HDR T51 and T52 Tests,” National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 6866, 2002.

15.

Luo, M. , He, Y. and Beck, V. , “Application of Field Model and Two-zone Model to Flashover Fires in a Full-scale Multi-room Single Level Building,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-25 .

16.

Dembsey, N. A. , Pagni, P. J. and Williamson, R. B. , “Compartment Fire Experiments: Comparison with Models,” Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1995, pp. 187-227 .

17.

Rein, G. , Bar-Ilan, A. , Alvares, N. and Fernandez-Pello, A. C. , “Estimating the Performance of Enclosure Fire Models by Correlating Forensic Evidence of Accidental Fires,” In: Conference Proceedings of the 10th Interflam, Vol. 2, Interscience Communications Ltd, UK, 2004, pp. 1183-1194 .

18.

Alpert, R. L. , “Ceiling Jet Flows,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, pp. 2-18.

19.

Delichatsios, M. A. , “Air Entrainment into Buoyant Jet Flames and Pool Fires,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Second Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 1995, pp. 2-20.

20.

Tewarson, A. , “Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fires,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, pp. 3-82.

21.

Mulholland, G. W. , “Smoke Production Properties,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, pp. 2-258.

22.

Cleary, T. G. , Chernovsky, A. , Grosshandler, W. L. and Anderson, M. , “Particulate Entry Lag in Spot-Type Smoke Detectors,” In: Fire Safety Science 6th International Symposium, Poitiers, France, 1999, pp. 779-790 .

23.

Forney, G. P. and McGrattan, K. B. , “User’s Guide for Smokeview Version 3.1: A Tool for Visualizing Fire Dynamics Simulation Data,” National Institute of Standards and Technology NISTIR 6980, 2003.

24.

Novozhilov, V. , “Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Compartment Fires,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 27, No. 6, 2001, pp. 611-666 .

25.

Drysdale, D. , An Introduction to Fire Dynamics, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester , 2002.

26.

ASTM E1354-02d, “Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter,” ASTM International American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA .

27.

Nowlen, S. P. , “Heat and Mass Release for Some Transient Fuel Source Fires: A Test Report,” Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report No. NUREG/CR-4680 and Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND 86-0312, 1986.

28.

Babrauskas, V. , “Heat Release Rates,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, p. 3-11.

29.

Fuel Properties and Combustion Data, Appendix C. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Second Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, p. A-41-A-41.

30.

Lattimer, B. Y. , “Heat Fluxes from Fire to Surfaces,” In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Third Edition, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, MA, USA and National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, USA , 2002, pp. 2-269.

31.

Babrauskas, V. , Ignition Handbook, Fire Science Publishers, Issaquah, WA, USA , 2003, 675-675.

32.

Joshi, A. A. and Pagni, P. J. , “BREAK1 Berkeley Algorithm for Breaking Window Glass in a Compartment Fire,” National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST , 1991.

33.

Stroup, D. W. , DeLauter, L. A. , Lee, J. and Roadarmel, G. L. , “Fire Tests of Men’s Suits on Racks,” National Institute of Standards and Technology Report of Test FR 4013, December 2001.

34.

Building and Fire Research Laboratory , Fire Experiment Results, National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST , http://www.fire.nist.gov/fire.

35.

Alger, R. S. and Wirsma, S. J. , “Ship Fire Characteristics, Part 1 Sealed Compartments,” Naval Surface Weapons Center Report NSWC/WOL TR 76-125, 1976.

36.

Saito, K. , Williams, F. A. , Wichman, I. S. and Quintiere, J. Q. , “Upward Turbulent Flame Spread on Wood Under External Radiation,” Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 111, 1989, pp. 438-445 .