An algorithm that calculates the time dependent smoke concentration in a fire-induced ceiling jet within a smoke layer and algorithms for predicting the response of photoelectric smoke alarms, both of which are part of the computer model JET, are examined using three different fires in a small room. The objectives of this analysis are to test the ceiling jet smoke algorithm and understand the limitations of analyzing signals from photoelectric smoke alarms located in the ceiling jet to estimate fire size and thereby support decision making by emergency responders. The analysis is restricted to flaming fires that produce turbulent plumes and can be represented by axisymmetric point sources. Two different smoke yields from the literature are used to obtain ceiling jet smoke density from JET. Depending on the value of the smoke yield used, the predictions of JET follow or do not follow the photoelectric smoke alarm signals. This suggests that additional information about how smoke yields are measured or that a better calibration technique is required in order to accurately model smoke alarm response.
Alpert RLCalculation of response time of ceiling-mounted fire detectors. Fire Technology1972; Vol. 8(3): 181-195.
2.
Evans DD and Stroup DWMethods to calculate the response time of heat and smoke detectors installed below large unobstructed ceilings. Fire Technology1985; Vol. 22(1): 54-63.
3.
Heskestad G. and Delichatsios MAEnvironments of fire detectors phase 1; effects of fire size, ceiling height and material, volume II - analysis. Technical Report Serial No. 22427, RC77-T-11. Norwood, MA: Factory Mutual Research Corporation, 1977, pp.1-100.
4.
Schifiliti RPFire detection modeling - the research application gap. In: AUBE ’01, 12th International conference on automatic fire detection. Gaithersburg, MD USA, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2001.
5.
Bukowski RW and Averill JDMethods for predicting smoke detector activation. In: Fire Suppression and Detection Research Application Symposium, Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap. National Fire Protection Research Foundation , Quincy, MA, 1998.
6.
Bukowski RW, Peacock RD, Averill JD, Cleary TG, Bryner NP, Walton WD, et al. Performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. NIST TN 1455-1 . Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2007, pp.1-396.
7.
Davis WD and Notarianni KANASA fire detector study. NISTIR5798. Gaithersburg, MD USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1996, pp.1-33.
8.
Klote J., Davis WD, Forney GP and Bukowski R.Field modeling: simulating the effects of HVAC induced air flow from various diffusers and returns on detector response. Year Four Report . National Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, 1998.
9.
Alpert RLTurbulent ceiling-jet induced by large-scale fires. Combustion Science and Technology1975; Vol. 11: 197-213.
10.
Yamauchi Y.Prediction of response time of smoke detectors in enclosure fires. NBSIR88-3707 . Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1988, pp.1-46.
11.
Davis WDZone fire model jet: a model for the prediction of detector activation and gas temperature in the presence of a smoke layer. NISTIR 6324. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1991, pp.1-55.
12.
Davis WD, Cleary TG, Donnelly MK and Hellerman SDPredicting smoke and carbon monoxide detector response in the ceiling jet in the presence of a smoke layer. NISTIR 6976. Gaithersburg , MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology , 2003, pp.1-35.
13.
Cleary TG, Chernovsky A., Grosshandler WL and Anderson M.Particulate entry lag in spot-type smoke detectors. In: Curtat M (ed.) Fire Safety Science - Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science (IAFSS), 2000.
14.
Grosshandler W.Toward the development of a universal fire emulator-detector evaluator. Fire Safety Journal1997; Vol. 29: 113-128.
15.
Mulholland GW and Croarkin C.Specific extinction coefficient of flame generated smoke. Fire and Materials2000; Vol. 24: 227-230.
16.
Mun JZ, Choi Y., Mulholland GW and Gritzo LASoot scattering measurements in the visible and near-infrared spectrum. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute2000; Vol. 28: 439-436.
17.
Tewarson A.Generation of heat and chemical compounds in fires. In: DiNenno PJ, Drysdale D, Beyler CL, Walton WD, Custer RLP, Hall Jr JR, et al. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 3rd ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2002, pp.3-82-3-161.
18.
Mulholland GW, Johnsson EL, Fernandez MG and Shear DADesign and testing of a new smoke concentration meter. Fire and Materials2000; Vol. 24: 231-243.
19.
Gore JP, Klassen M., Hamins A. and Kashiwagi T.Fire safety science - proceedings of the third international symposium. London: Elsevier, 1991.
20.
Wade RW, Sivathanu YR and Gore JPSoot volume fraction and temperature properties of high liquid loading spray flames. In: Proceedings: Combustion Fundamentals and Applications. Joint Meeting of the Central and Western States Sections, Mexican National Section and American Flame Research Committee, Pittsburg, PA, The Combustion Institute, 1995.
21.
Mulholland GWSmoke production and properties. In: DiNenno PJ, Drysdale D, Beyler CL, Walton WD, Custer RLP, Hall Jr JR, et al. The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2002, pp.2-258-2-268.
22.
Yang JC, Hamins A. and Kashiwagi T.Estimate of the effect of scale on radiative heat loss fraction and combustion efficiency. Combustion Science and Technology1994; Vol. 96: 183-188.
