A study was conducted to investigate the job satisfaction of individuals with developmental disabilities in supported employment. A total of 34 persons were individually interviewed to determine their satisfaction with supported employment services received and their current job. Findings indicated that the majority of individuals (a) liked their jobs, (b) were satisfied with the help that their job coach had provided, (c) had a voice in choosing their job, (d) would rather work in the community than attend a workshop, and (e) said they had friends at work. Results are discussed in terms of socially validating supported employment outcomes and providing program evaluation information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiklenS. K., & MoseleyC. R. (1988). “Are you retarded?” “No, I'm Catholic”: Qualitative methods in the study of people with severe handicaps. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 155–162.
2.
ConleyD. P., RuschF. R., McCaughrinW. B., & TinesJ. (1989). Benefits and costs of supported employment: An analysis of the Illinois Supported Employment Project. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 441–447.
3.
HillM., & WehmanP. (1983). Cost benefit analysis of placing moderately and severely handicapped individuals into competitive employment. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8(1), 30–38.
4.
HillM., WehmanP., KregelJ., BanksP., & MetzlerH. (1987). Employment outcomes for people with moderate and severe disabilities: An eight-year longitudinal analysis of supported competitive employment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 182–189.
5.
IngeK. J., BanksP. D., WehmanP., HillJ. W., & ShaferM. S. (1988). Quality of life for individuals who are labeled mentally retarded: Evaluating competitive employment versus sheltered workshop employment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 97–104.
6.
KregelJ., WehmanP., & BanksP. D. (1989). The effects of consumer characteristics and type of employment model on individual outcomes in supported employment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 407–415.
7.
MasonC. Y. (1990). Consumer choice and satisfaction. National Association of Rehabilitation Facilities, Washington, D.C.
8.
McDonnellJ., NofsD., HardmanM., & ChamblessC. (1989). An analysis of the procedural components of supported employment programs associated with employment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 417–428.
9.
MoseleyC. R. (1988). Job satisfaction research: Implications for supported employment. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 211–219.
10.
NaeveL., HardingF., SheaI., & AllenW. (1990, July). Results of a job satisfaction survey of persons with disabilities who are supportively employed. Paper presented at Association for Persons in Supported Employment conference, Denver, CO.
11.
NisbetJ., & YorkP. (1989). Indices of job satisfaction of persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 274–280.
12.
NobleJ. H., & ConleyR. W. (1987). Accumulating evidence on the benefits and costs of supported and transitional employment for persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 163–174.
13.
SeltzerM. M. (1984). Patterns of job satisfaction among mentally handicapped adults. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 147–149.
14.
SchwartzI. S., & BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
15.
ShaferM. S., HillJ., SeyfarthJ., & WehmanP. (1987). Competitive employment and workers with mental retardation: Analysis of employer's perceptions and experiences. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 92, 304–311.
16.
ShaferM. S., RiceM. L., MetzlerH. M. D., & HaringM. (1989). A survey of nondisabled employees’ attitudes toward supported employees with mental retardation. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 137–146.
17.
StoreyK., SandowD., & RhodesL. (1990). Service delivery issues in supported employment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 325–332.
18.
TestD. W., AlfordC. J., & KeulP. K. (1990). Job satisfaction of persons in supported employment. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
TestD. W., GrossiT., & KeulP. K. (1988). A functional analysis of the acquisition and maintenance of janitorial skills in a competitive work setting. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 1–7.
20.
TurnerJ. L. (1984). Ethnographic observations in a work setting for retarded adults. In EdgertonR. B. & BegabM. J. (Eds.), Ethnological perspectives in mental retardation (pp. 147–171). Baltimore: University Park.
21.
WackerD. P., Fromm-SteegeL., BergW. K., & FlynnT. H. (1989). Supported employment as an intervention package: A preliminary analysis of functional variables. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 429–439.
22.
WehmanP., HillM., GoodallP., ClevelandP., BrookeV., & PentecostJ. H. (1982). Job placement and follow-up of moderately and severely handicapped individuals after three years. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 269–276.
23.
WehmanP., HillJ. W., & KoehlerF. (1979a). Placement of developmentally disabled individuals into competitive employment: Three case studies. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 14, 269–276.
24.
WehmanP., HillJ. W., & KoehlerF. (1979b). Helping severely handicapped persons enter competitive employment. AAESPH Review, 4, 274–290.
25.
WehmanP., HillJ. W., WoodW., & ParentW. (1987). A report on competitive employment histories of persons labeled severely retarded. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 11–17.
26.
WehmanP., KregelJ., & ShaferM. S. (1989). Emerging trends in the national supported employment initiative: A preliminary analysis of twenty-seven states. Richmond, VA: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Supported Employment, Virginia Commonwealth University.
27.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
