Regional Development Agencies in the United Kingdom

Abstract

This article applies a modelling approach to examine the establishment of Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) in England. RDAs are an important part of New Labour's policy programme for regional economic development, and their implementation requires the involvement of actors at both central and local government levels. The three phases of negotiations that took place between these actors are studied using alternative models of collective decision-making, including a cooperative exchange model and a non-cooperative conflict model. Data on the key elements of the decision-making process - including the issues discussed during the negotiations, the actors' policy positions and capabilities, and the levels of salience they attached to the issues - were collected systematically and form the basis of the analysis. Application of the models allows inferences to be drawn regarding the nature of the decision-making process that took place prior to the policy outcomes. These analyses are supported by the estimates of the utility gains and losses experienced by the actors as a result of the policy outcomes that were realized. The results demonstrate that Labour has pursued a largely consensual approach based on exchange and log-rolling.

Keywords

British Labour Party models of collective decision-making Regional Development Agencies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett, J.B. and D. Payne . 2000. Local and Regional Economic Development: Rrenegotiating Power under Labour. Ashcroft: London.

Bueno de Mesquita, B. 1994. `Political Forecasting: an Expected Utility Method.' In European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications and Comparisons, eds B. Bueno de Mesquita and F.N.N. Stokman , pp. 71-104. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

Bueno de Mesquita, B. and F.N.N. Stokman , eds. 1994. European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

Hanf, K. and F.W. Scharpf . 1978. Interorganisational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage.

Heclo, H. 1978. `Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.' In The New American Political System, ed. A. King , pp. 87-124. Washington, D.C. American Enterprise Institute.

Laumann, E.O. and D. Knoke . 1987. The Organisational State Social Change in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Marin, B. and R. Mayntz , eds. 1991. Policy Networks Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Consideration. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Mokken, R.J. and F.N. Stokman . 1976. `Power and Influence as Political Phenomena.' In Power and Political Theory. Some European Perspectives, ed. B. Barry . London: John Wiley.

Payne, D. 1999. Policy Making in the European Community. An Analysis of the Impact of the Reform of the Structural Funds in Ireland. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.

10.

Regional Policy Commission . 1996. Renewing the Regions. Strategies for Regional Economic Development. Labour Party Report. Sheffield: Hallam University.

11.

Stokman, F.N. and J.M.M. van den Bos . 1992. `A Two-stage Model of Policy Making with an Empirical Test in the US Energy Policy Domain.' In The Political Consequences of Social Networks. Research in Politics and Society, eds G. Moore and J.A. Whitt , vol. 4. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

12.

Stokman, F.N. and R. van Oosten . 1994. `The Exchange of Voting Position: An Object Oriented Model of Policy Networks.' In European Community Decision Making. Models, Applications and Comparisons, eds Bueno de Mesquita and F.N. Stokman . New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

13.

Stokman, F.N. and J. Stokman . 1995. `Strategic Control and Interests. Its Effects on Decision Outcomes.' Journal of Mathematical Sociology 20(4): 289-317.