The article presents development of a nursing model for holistically understanding the family environment that acts on family well-being as well as of tools based on this model to assess family well-being. These were constructed by using qualitative, quantitative, and literary approaches, such as the Delphi technique, a literature review, semistructured interviews with families, and ethnographic studies in Japan, Hong Kong, and the United States. In the “Concentric Sphere Family Environment Model,” a three-dimensional logical space is formed by the three assessment axes of relationships (structural distance, functional distance, and temporal distance) and five systems (supra system, macro system, micro system, family internal environment system, and chrono system) located therein. The “Family Environment Assessment Index” comprises 37 items for assessing the family well-being, and for each of their specifications useful sample questions are provided to conduct the culturally congruent family assessment.
AlaggiaR. (2010). An ecological analysis of child sexual abuse disclosure: Considerations for child and adolescent mental health. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(1), 32-39.
2.
AndersonK. H.TomlinsonP. S. (1992). The family health system as an emerging paradigmatic view for nursing. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24, 57-63.
3.
AndrewsM. P.BubolzM. M.PaolucciB. (1980). An ecological approach to study of the family. Marriage and Family Review, 3, 29-49.
4.
BeckC. T. (1993). Qualitative research: The evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 263-266.
5.
BertalanffyL. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.
8.
BronfenbrennerU. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187-249.
9.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
GarbarinoJ.ShermanD. (1980). High-risk neighborhoods and high-risk families: The human ecology of child maltreatment. Child Development, 51, 188-198.
11.
GoetzJ. P.LeCompteM. D. (1981). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12(1), 51-70.
12.
HohashiN.HinoueE. (2010). Shoukou betsu kazoku kango [Family health care nursing according to types of family symptomatology]. In HohashiN. (Ed.), Atarashii kazoku kangogaku: Riron, jissen, kenkyu [New family health care nursing: Theory, practice and research] (pp. 45-51). Tokyo, Japan: Medical Friend.
13.
HohashiN.KoyamaC. (2004). A Japan-U.S. comparison of family functions from the perspective of mothers utilizing “family houses”: Cross-cultural research using the Feetham Family Functioning survey. Japanese Journal of Research in Family Nursing, 10(1), 21-31.
14.
KillienM. G. (1985). An environmental approach to nursing practice. In HallJ. E.WeaverB. R. (Eds.), Distributive nursing practice: A systems approach to community health (pp. 259-277). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
15.
KleffelD. (1991). Rethinking the environment as a domain of nursing knowledge. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(1), 40-51.
16.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
McGoldrickM.GersonR.ShellenbergerS. (1999). Genograms: Assessment and intervention. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
18.
McKennaH. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 1221-1225.
19.
MeyerC. H. (1983). Clinical social work in the eco-systems perspective. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
MoellerD. W. (2005). Environmental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
PorterL. W. (1961). A study of perceived need satisfaction in bottom and middle management jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 1-10.
23.
RogersM. E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
RoyC.AndrewsH. A. (1999). The Roy adaptation model. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
26.
ShirahamaK.InoueE. M. (2001). Spirituality in nursing from a Japanese perspective. Holistic Nursing Practice, 15(3), 63-72.
27.
SuzukiD. (1988). Japanese spirituality (WaddellN., Trans.). New York, NY: Greenwood Press. (Original work published 1972)
28.
TaniguchiY.TatsukiS. (1991). Kazoku wo tyushin to shita ekorojikaru apurochi no jissen [Practice of ecological approach to the families]. Shakai Fukushi Kenkyu, 50, 74-80.
29.
WalkerL. O.AvantK. C. (2004). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
World Health Organization. (1974). Community health nursing: Report of a WHO expert committee (Technical Report Series No. 558). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
31.
WrightL. M. (2004). Spirituality, suffering, and illness: Ideas for healing. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
32.
WrightL. M.LeaheyM. (2009). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
33.
YamaneI. (1987). Shinriteki kyori to menshikido suijun no kouka ni motozuku taijin keiken no bunseki [Analysis of personal experience based on the effects of psychological distance and standards for degree of acquaintance]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 57, 329-334.
