Purpose: This qualitative study was conducted with 14 South Asian women in Hong Kong to explore their perception and experiences of domestic violence by an intimate partner. Design: All interviews were transcribed and then coded based on the process of coding suggested by Strauss and Corbin, including both open and axial coding. Results: Data analysis resulted in two main core categories, “Women’s perception of domestic violence” and “Cultural factors that influence their help-seeking behavior,” denoting that the context in which domestic violence is experienced influences women’s perception and understanding of domestic violence. Participants also drew on the discourse of culture to explain its role in their experiences of domestic violence. Conclusion: Domestic violence is a concern among this group of South Asian women. Culturally appropriate domestic violence services and public education on domestic violence are needed for this community.
AbrahamM. (1999). Sexual abuse in South Asian immigrant marriages. Violence Against Women, 5, 591-618. doi:10.1177/10778019922181392
2.
AbrahamM. (2000a). Speaking the unspeakable: Marital violence among South Asian immigrants in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
AbrahamM. (2000b). Isolation as a form of marital violence: The South Asian immigrant experience. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 221-236. doi:10.1023/A:1009460002177
4.
AdamesS. B.CampbellR. (2005). Immigrant Latina’s conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 11, 1341-1364. doi:10.1177/1077801205280191
5.
AriasI.CorsoP. (2005). Average cost per person victimized by an intimate partner of the opposite gender: A comparison of men and women. Violence and Victims, 20, 379-391. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.20.4.379
6.
AssanandS.DiasM.RichardsonE.Waxler-MorrisonN. (2005). The South Asians. In NancyW.-M.AndersonJ. M.RichardsonE. (Eds.), Cross-cultural caring: A handbook for health professionals (2nd ed., pp. 197-246). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
7.
BuiH. N.MorashM. (1999). Domestic violence in the Vietnamese immigrant community: An exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 5, 769-795. doi:10.1177/10778019922181473
8.
Census and Statistics Department. (2012). 2011 Population census: Thematic report—Ethnic minorities. Hong Kong: Author.
9.
ChanA. C. M.WongE. H. Y. (2005). Survey on public attitude and perception towards ethnic minorities 2004. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Institute of Ageing Studies (APIAS), Lingnan University.
10.
CheyneC.O’BrienM.BelgraveM. (Eds.). (2000). Diversity and inclusiveness: The feminist and anti-racist critiques of social policy (2nd ed., pp. 96-119). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChowW. (2009). An overview of domestic violence ordinance in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hampton Winter & Glynn.
12.
CrabtreeS. A.WongH. (2012). “Ah Cha!” The racial discrimination of Pakistani minority communities in Hong Kong: An analysis of multiple, intersecting oppressions. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs026
13.
DasguptaS. D. (2000a). Body evidence: Intimate violence against South Asian women in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
DasguptaS. D. (2000b). Charting the course: An overview of domestic violence in the South Asian community in the United States. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 173-185. doi:10.1023/A:1009403917198
15.
DasguptaS. D. (2006). Women’s realities: Defining violence against women by immigration, race and class. In SokoloffN. J. (Ed.), Domestic violence at the margins (pp. 56-70). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
16.
DasguptaS. D.WarrierS. (1996). In the footsteps of “Arundhati”: Asian Indian women’s experience of domestic violence in the United States. Violence Against Women, 2, 238-259. doi:10.1177/1077801296002003002
17.
DobashR. E.DobashR. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
EllsbergM.JansenH. A.HeiseL.WattsC. H.Garcia-MorenoC. (2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: An observational study. Lancet, 371, 1165-1172. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X
19.
Far East Overseas Nepalese Association. (2000). Equality for all races and sexes. Hong Kong: Author.
20.
FitzpatrickD.HallidayC. (1992). Not the way to love. Amherst, Nova Scotia, Canada: Cumberland County Transition House Association.
21.
GeorgeM. S.RahangdaleL. (1999). Domestic violence and South Asian women. North Carolina Medical Journal, 60, 157-159.
22.
GillA. (2004). Voicing the silent fear: South Asian women’s experiences of domestic violence. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 465-483. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=618823
23.
GoodrumS.UmbersonD.AndersonK. L. (2001). The batterer’s view of the self and others in domestic violence. Sociological Inquiry, 71, 221-241. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01109.x
24.
GordonM. (2000). Definitional issues in violence against women. Violence Against Women, 6, 747-783. doi:10.1177/1077801200006007004
HagueG.MalosE. (2005). Domestic violence: Action for change (3rd ed.). Cheltenham, England: New Clarion.
27.
Haj-YahiaM. M. (1998). A patriarchal perspective of beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian men from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 595-621. doi:10.1177/019251398019005006
28.
HanA. D.KimE. J.TysonS. Y. (2010). Partner violence against Korean immigrant women. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 370-376. doi:10.1177/1043659609360710
29.
HanrahanP.CampbellJ.UlrichY. (1993). Theories of violence. In CampbellJ.HumphreysJ. (Eds.), Nursing care of survivors of family violence (2nd ed., pp. 3-35). St. Louis MO: Mosby.
30.
HeiseL.AlanaghR.WattsC. H.SZwiA. B. (1994). Violence against women: A neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Social Science & Medicine, 39, 1165-1179. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90349-2
31.
Hong Kong Council of Social Service. (2008). Handling domestic violence case in ethnic minority groups. Hong Kong: Author.
32.
INCLEN. (2000). Domestic violence in India: A summary report of a multi-site household survey. Washington, DC: International Centre for Research on Women.
33.
KellyU. A.Gonzalez-GuardaR. M.TaylorJ. (2011). Theories of intimate partner violence. In HumphreysJ.CampbellJ. C. (Eds.), Family violence and nursing (2nd ed., pp. 51-89). New York, NY: Springer.
34.
KhanA.HussainR. (2008). Violence against women in Pakistan: Perceptions and experiences of domestic violence. Asian Studies Review, 32, 239-253. doi:10.1080/10357820802062181
35.
KibriaN. (1990). Power, patriarchy, and gender conflict in the Vietnamese immigrant community. Gender & Society, 4(1), 9-24. doi:10.1177/0891243900040001002
KuH. B.ChanK. W.SandhuK. K. (2005). A research report on the education of South Asian ethnic minority groups in Hong Kong. Research report series. Hong Kong: Centre for Social Policy Studies, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
38.
Law Reform Commission. (2005). The Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong: Report on child custody and access. Hong Kong: Executive Council, Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.hkreform.gov.hk
39.
LeeV. (2008). Strategies and measures in tackling domestic violence in selected places. Hong Kong: Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat.
40.
LevinsonD. (1989). Family violence in cross-cultural perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
LiangB.GoodmanL.Tummala-NarraP.WeintraubS. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking processes among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 71-84. doi:10.1007/s10464-005-6233-6
42.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
LiuA. (1999). Family law for the Hong Kong SAR. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
44.
LoperK. (2004). Race equality: A study of ethnic minorities in Hong Kong’s education system: Project report analysis. Hong Kong: Centre for Comparative and Public Law, the University of Hong Kong.
45.
MahlstedtD.KeenyL. (1993). Female survivors of dating violence and their social networks. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 319-333. doi:10.1177/0959353593033003
46.
MenjivarC.SalcidoO. (2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence: Common experiences in different countries. Gender & Society, 16, 898-920. doi:10.1177/089/24302237894
47.
MidlarskyE.Venkatapamani-KothariA.PlanteM. (2006). Domestic violence in the Chinese and South Asian communities. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1087, 279-300. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.003
48.
MorashM.BuiH. N.SantiagoA. (2000). Gender specific ideology of domestic violence in Mexican origin families. International Review of Victimology, 1, 67-91. doi:10.1177/10778010222183107
49.
NankaniS. (2000). Breaking the silence: Domestic violence in the South Asian-American Community. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
50.
NguyenT. D. (2007). Domestic violence in Asian-American communities: A cultural overview. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
51.
RajA.SilvermanJ. (2002a). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context, and the legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8, 367-398. doi:10.1177/10778010222183107
52.
RajA.SilvermanJ. (2002b). Intimate partner violence against South Asian women in Greater Boston. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 57, 111-114.
53.
Ramisetty-MiklerS. (1993). Asian Indian immigrants in American and sociocultural issues in counselling. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 21(1), 36-49. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.1993.tb00581
54.
ReinharzS. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
RusbultC. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
56.
RussoN. F.PirlottA. (2006). Gender-based violence: Concepts, methods, and findings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 178-205. doi:10.1196/annals.1385.024
57.
Scully-HillA. (2011). Domestic violence in Hong Kong. In HewittP. (Ed.), Family law & practice in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters. p. 1-47.
58.
SiddiquiH. (2013). True honour: Domestic violence, forced marriage and honour crimes in the UK. In RehmanY.KellyL.SiddiquiH. (Eds.), Moving in the shadows: Violence in the lives of minority and children (pp. 169-184). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
59.
SiddiquiN.IsmailS.AllenM. (2008). Safe to return? Pakistani women, domestic violence and access to refugee protection—A report of a transnational research project conducted in the UK and Pakistan. Manchester, England: South Manchester Law Centre.
60.
SmithP. H.ThorntonG. E.DeVellisR.EarpJ.CokerA. L. (2002). A population-based study of the prevalence and distinctiveness of battering, physical assault and sexual assault in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1208-1232. doi:10.1177/107780102320562691
61.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
62.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
TakharS. (2013). Sexuality and South Asian women: A taboo? In RehmanY.KellyL.SiddiquiH. (Eds.), Moving in the shadows: Violence in the lives of minority women and children (pp. 77-86). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
64.
TangC. S.-K. (1999). Wife abuse in Hong Kong Chinese families: A community survey. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 173-191. doi:10.1023/A:1022028803208
65.
TangK. L.LamC. M.LamM. C.NgaiS. Y. (2006). Racial discrimination in Hong Kong: Prevalence and impact. Hong Kong: Department of Social work, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
66.
ThiaraR. K.GillA. K. (2010). Understanding violence against South Asian women: What it means for practice. In ThiaraR. K.GillA. K. (Eds.), Violence against women in South Asian communities: Issues for policy and practice (pp. 29-54). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
67.
ThiaraR. K.GillA. K. (2012). Domestic violence, child contact and post-separation violence: Issues for South Asian and African-Caribbean women and children: A report of findings. London, England: National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.
68.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000). Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
69.
TranC. G.Des JardinsK. (2000). Domestic violence in Vietnamese refugee and Korean immigrant communities. In ChinJ. L. (Ed.), Relationships among Asian American women (pp. 71-96). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
70.
VaidK. N. (1972). The overseas Indian community in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, The University of Hong Kong.
71.
WhiteB. S. (1994). Turbans and traders: Hong Kong’s Indian communities. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
72.
WelshF. (1997) A history of Hong Kong. London: Harper Collins.
73.
WeissA. (1991). South Asian Muslims in Hong Kong: Creation of a ‘local boy’ identity, Modern Asian Studies, 25(3), 417-453
74.
YlloK. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In GellesR.LosekeD. R. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 19-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
75.
YlloK. (2005). Through a feminist lens: Gender, diversity, and violence: Extending the feminist framework. In LosekeD. R.GellesR. J.CavanaughM. M. (Eds.), Current controversies on family violences (pp. 19-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
YlloK.StrausM. A. (1990). Patriarchy and violence against wives: The impact of structural and normative factors. In StrausM.GellesR. (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. p.383-399.
