Purpose: To critically analyze the power relations underpinning New Zealand maternity, through analysis of discourses used by Korean migrant mothers. Design: Data from a focus group with Korean new mothers was subjected to a secondary analysis using a discourse analysis drawing on postcolonial feminist and Foucauldian theoretical ideas. Results: Korean mothers in the study framed the maternal body as an at-risk body, which meant that they struggled to fit into the local discursive landscape of maternity as empowering. They described feeling silenced, unrecognized, and uncared for. Discussion and Conclusions: The Korean mothers’ culturally different beliefs and practices were not incorporated into their care. They were interpellated into understanding themselves as problematic and othered, evidenced in their take up of marginalized discourses. Implications for Practice: Providing culturally safe services in maternity requires considering their affects on culturally different women and expanding the discourses that are available.
ArmstrongE. M. (2003). Lessons in control: Prenatal education in the hospital. In ConradP.LeiterV. (Eds.), Health and health care as social problems (pp. 267-294). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
BartleyA. (2004). Contemporary Asian migration to New Zealand: Challenging the “Settler” paradigm. In SpoonleyP.MacphersonC.PearsonD. (Eds.), Tangata, tangata: The changing ethnic contours of New Zealand (pp.157-173). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
3.
BartleyA.SpoonleyP. (2004). Constructing a workable multiculturalism in a bicultural society. In BelgraveM.KawharuM.WilliamsD. V. (Eds.), Waitangi revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi (2nd ed., pp. 136-148). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
BrowneA. J.VarcoeC.SmyeV.Reimer-KirkhamS.LynamM. J.WongS. (2009). Cultural safety and the challenges of translating critically oriented knowledge in practice. Nursing Philosophy, 10, 167-179.
6.
ChangS.MorrisC.VokesR. (2006). Korean migrant families in Christchurch: Expectations and experiences. Wellington, New Zealand: Families Commission.
7.
DavisD. L.WalkerK. (2009). Case-loading midwifery in New Zealand: Making space for childbirth. Midwifery, 26, 603-608.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond hermeneutics and structuralism (pp. 208-226). Brighton, England: Harvester.
14.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16-49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
15.
FoucaultM. (2004). Right of death and power over life. In Scheper-HughesN.BourgoisP. I. (Eds.), Violence in war and peace (pp. 79-83). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16.
GandhiL. (1998). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
17.
GaveyN. (1989). Feminist postructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to a feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459-475.
18.
GeigerS.ProtheroA. (2007). Rhetoric versus reality: Exploring consumer empowerment in a maternity setting. Consumption Markets & Culture, 10, 375-400.
19.
GreenM. J.SonnC. C. (2006). Problematising the discourses of the dominant: Whiteness and reconciliation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 379-395.
20.
KaiJ.BeavanJ.FaullC.DodsonL.GillP. (2007). Professional uncertainty and disempowerment responding to ethnic diversity in health care: A qualitative study. PLoS Medicine, 4, 1766-1775.
21.
KimJ.StarksD. (2005). Language diaries: A case study of language use in the New Zealand Korean community. In BellA.HarlowR.StarksD. (Eds.), Languages of New Zealand (pp. 343-369). Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
22.
KruegerR.CaseyM. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London, England: Sage.
MalsonH. (1998). The thin woman: Feminism, post-structuralism, and the social psychology of anorexia nervosa. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
Ministry of Health. (2007). Notice pursuant to Section 88 of the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
26.
MorganK. P. (1998). Contested bodies, contested knowledges: Women, health, and the politics of medicalization. In SherwinS. (Ed.), The politics of women’s health: Exploring agency and autonomy (pp. 83-121). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
MorrisC.VokesR.ChangS. (2007). Social exclusion and church in the experiences of Korean migrant families in Christchurch. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 11-31.
28.
NairnR. G. R. (2003). Madness, media & mental illness: A social constructionist approach (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
29.
NgR. (1995). Teaching against the grain: Contradictions and possibilities. In NgR.StatonP.ScaneJ. (Eds.), Anti-racism, feminism, and critical approaches to education (pp. 129-153). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
30.
OngA. (1999). Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
PairmanS. (2006). Midwifery partnership: Working with women. In PageL.McCandlishR. (Eds.), The new midwifery: Science and sensitivity in practice (2nd ed., pp. 73-97). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone.
32.
ParkerI. (1999). Introduction: Varieties of discourse and analysis. In ParkerI.NetworkB. D. (Eds.), Critical textwork: An introduction to varieties of discourse and analysis (pp. 1-13). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
33.
PayneD. (2001). The elderly primigravida: Contest and complexity: A Foucauldian analysis of maternal age in relation to pregnancy and birth (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
34.
PowersP. (2001). The methodology of discourse analysis. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Jones & Bartlett.
35.
RingroseJ. (2007). Successful girls? Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education, 19, 471-489.
36.
ScottJ. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773-797.
37.
SheridanN.KenealyT. W.ConnollyM. J.MahonyF.BarberA.BoydM. A.. . .MoffittA. (2011). Health equity in the New Zealand health care system: A national survey. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10, 45. Retrieved from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/45
38.
SpringerS. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 133-147.
39.
StojanovicJ. (2008). Midwifery in New Zealand 1904-1971. Contemporary Nurse, 30, 156-167.
TangL. (2010). Empowering or disempowering? Online support among seafarer-partners. Sociological Research Online, 15(2), 6.
42.
TremainS. (2006). Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero. Hypatia, 21(1),35-53.
43.
VarcoeC.RodneyP.McCormickJ. (2003). Health care relationships in context: An analysis of three ethnographies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 957-973.
44.
WeirL. (1996). Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society, 25, 373-392.
