Childbearing Perceptions Among Taiwanese Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Introduction:

Some infertile women are eager to have children. The purpose of this study was to explore the childbearing perceptions of women who undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

Methodology:

Qualitative phenomenological data were collected from 20 infertile women who received IVF treatment in Taiwan. We conducted one-on-one in-depth interviews with the women. Audio recordings were transcribed as textual data and analyzed using Giorgi content analysis until saturation was achieved.

Results:

Three themes were identified: important tasks related to practicing the family life cycle, ensuring a tight circle of marriage, and the hope to change health.

Discussion:

Perceptions regarding childbearing in women undergoing IVF treatment in the context of the traditional Chinese fertility culture are multifaceted. To improve the overall integrity of health care provided to infertile women, nurses should be encouraged to consider the cultural connotations and needs of infertile women in the clinic.

Keywords

infertility in vitro fertilization childbearing culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adachi

Endo

Ohashi

(2020). Regret over the delay in childbearing decision negatively associates with life satisfaction among Japanese women and men seeking fertility treatment: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 20, Article 886. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09025-5

Aimagambetova

Issanov

Terzic

Bapayeva

Ukybassova

Baikoshkarova

Aldiyarova

Shauyen

Terzic

(2020). The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: Reality or speculations? PLOS ONE, 15(12), Article e0242024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242024

Bedford

Yeh

K.-H.

(2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100

Department of Household Registration. (2020). Household registration statistics data analysis. https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346

GBD 2017 Population and Fertility Collaborators. (2018). Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 392(10159), 1995–2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32278-5

Giorgi

(1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In Giorgi

(Ed.), Phenomenological and psychological research (pp. 8–22). Duquesne University Press.

Guo

Gao

Sun

Feng

(2020). Filial piety and intergenerational ambivalence among mother–adult child dyads in rural China. Ageing & Society, 40(12), 2695–2710. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X19000783

Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2021). The assisted reproductive technology summary 2019 national report of Taiwan. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=233&pid=14136

Healthwise staff. (2021). Family life cycle. https://www.peacehealth.org/medical-topics/id/ty6171

10.

Kim

J. H.

Silverstein

(2020). Are filial piety and ethnic community engagement associated with psychological wellbeing among older Chinese American immigrants? A cultural resource perspective. Research on Aging, 43(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520937477

11.

Lee

G. L.

Neimeyer

R. A.

Chan

C. L. W.

(2012). The meaning of childbearing among IVF service users assessed via laddering technique. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 25, 302–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2012.703573

12.

Lee

S.-H.

Kuo

B.-J.

Whang

L.-S.

Lee

M.-S.

(2000). Changes in Chinese traditional childbearing attitudes in previously infertile couples. Nursing Research, 8(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.7081/NR.200004.0142

13.

Lee

S.-H.

Kuo

C.-P.

Hsiao

C.-Y.

Y.-C.

Hsu

M.-Y.

Kuo

P.-C.

Lee

M.-S.

Lee

M.-C.

(2013). Development of a Chinese Childbearing Attitude Questionnaire for infertile women receiving in vitro fertilization treatment. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 24(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659612472060

14.

Leininger

(1991). Cultural care diversity and universality. National League of Nursing.

15.

Lei

Yan

Guimerans

Xing

Sun

Zhang

(2017). A study of sociocultural factors on depression in Chinese infertile women from Hunan Province. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 38, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1265500

16.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

17.

Mascarenhas

M. N.

Flaxman

S. R.

Boerma

Vanderpoel

Stevens

(2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLOS Medicine, 9(12), Article e1001356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356

18.

Moorley

Cathala

(2018). How to appraise qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(1), 10–13.

19.

Moura-Ramos

Gameiro

Canavarro

M. C.

Soares

Santos

T. A.

(2012). The indirect effect of contextual factors on the emotional distress of infertile couples. Psychology & Health, 27, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.598231

20.

Patel

Sharma

P. S. V. N.

Kumar

(2018). Role of mental health practitioner in infertility clinics: A review on past, present and future directions. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_41_18

21.

Pedro

Brandao

Fernandes

Barros

Xavier

Schmidt

Costa

M. E.

Martins

M. V.

(2021). Perceived threat of infertility and women’s intention to anticipate childbearing: The mediating role of personally perceived barriers and facilitators. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 28, 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-020-09743-3

22.

Peixoto-Freitas

Rodríguez-González

Crabtree

S. A.

Martins

M. V.

(2020). Differentiation of self, couple adjustment and family life cycle: A cross-sectional study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 48(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1736689

23.

Peng

Coates

Maycock

(2012). Investigating marital relationship in infertility: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 13(2), 71–80.

24.

Ray

C. M.

Harcey

S. R.

McQuillan

Greil

A. L.

(2020). Mutual influence? Gender, partner pregnancy desires, fertility intentions, and birth outcomes in U.S. heterosexual couples. Journal of Family Issues, 41(11), 2090–2111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x20906540

25.

Roberts

Renati

Solomon

Montgomery

(2020). Women and infertility in a pronatalist culture: Mental health in the slums of Mumbai. International Journal of Women’s Health, 12, 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S273149

26.

Sandelowski

(2000). Focus on research methods-whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:43.0.CO;2-G

27.

Sandelowski

(2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362

28.

Shorten

Moorley

(2014). Selecting the sample. Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 32–33.

29.

Sullivan

E. A.

Zegers-Hochschild

Mansour

Ishihara

de Mouzon

Nygren

K. G.

Adamson

G. D.

(2013). International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2004. Human Reproduction, 28(5), 1375–1390. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det036

30.

Yao

Chan

C. H. Y.

Chan

C. L. W.

(2018). Childbearing importance: A qualitative study of women with infertility in China. Research in Nursing & Health, 41, 69–77. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21846