This study examines the predictors of discretionary decisions made by probation and parole officers (PPOs) when they face clients who commit technical rule violations during community supervision. Although prior studies of discretionary decisions in criminal justice systems typically focus on legal predictors of discretion (i.e., offense- and offender-based variables), this study examines extralegal predictors to include PPOs’ sociodemographical, occupational, and organizational characteristics. The study uses data collected from a national self-report survey of 332 PPOs who worked with adults and who were members of the American Probation and Parole Association in 2005. Logistic regression analyses examine extralegal predictors of PPO support for formal hearings (i.e., judicial or parole board hearings) in response to technical rule violations. Analyses identify significant occupational and organizational factors that predicted discretionary decisions. Policy implications and directions for future research are examined.
Abadinsky, H. ( 1978). Parole history: An economic perspective. Offender Rehabilitation, 2, 275-278.
2.
Alschuler, A.W. ( 1979). Plea bargaining and its history. Law & Society Review, 13, 211-245.
3.
American Probation and Parole Association. ( 1987). Probation. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.appa-net.org
4.
Banks, J., Porter, A.L., Rardin, R.L., Silver, T.R., & Unger, V.E. ( 1977). Evaluation of intensive special probation projects. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
Bond, J.E. ( 1975). Plea bargaining and guilty pleas. New York: Clark Boardman.
6.
Camp, C.G., & Camp, G.M. ( 2002). The corrections yearbook 2001: Adult systems. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.
7.
Camp, C.G., & Camp, G.M. ( 2003). The corrections yearbook 2002: Adult systems. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.
8.
Carroll, L., & Doubet, M. ( 1983). U.S. social structure and imprisonment. Criminology, 21, 449-456.
9.
Champion, D. ( 2005). Probation, parole and community corrections (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Chiricos, T.G., & Crawford, C. ( 1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. F. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp. 281-309). Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Davis, K.C. ( 1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press
12.
Dixon, J. ( 1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
13.
Durose, M.R., & Langan, P.A. ( 2005). State court sentencing of convicted felons, 2002: Statistical tables (NCJ 208910). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
14.
Erez, E. ( 1989). Gender, rehabilitation, and probation decisions. Criminology, 27, 307-327.
15.
Feeley, M.M., & Simon, J. ( 1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-475.
16.
Feld, B. ( 1991). Justice by geography: Urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 156-210.
17.
Friedman, L.M. ( 1979). Plea bargaining in historical perspective. Law & Society Review, 13, 247-259.
18.
Gelsthorpe, L., & Padfield, N. ( 2003). Introduction. In L. Gelsthorpe & N. Padfield (Eds.), Exercising discretion: Decision-making in the criminal justice system (pp. 1-28). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
19.
Glaze, L.E., & Palla, S. ( 2004, July). Bureau of Justice Statistics bulletin: Probation and parole in the United States, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
Greenberg, D., & West, V. ( 2001). State prison populations and their growth, 1971-1991 . Criminology, 39, 615-654.
21.
Harris, P.M., Gingerich, R., & Whittaker, T.A. (2004). The effectiveness of differential supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 235-271.
22.
Harrison, P.M., & Beck, A.J. ( 2006, May). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2005. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
Ho, T. ( 2003). The influence of suspect gender in domestic violence arrests. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 183-195.
24.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. ( 1989). Applied logistic regression. New York : John Wiley.
25.
Huang, W.S.W., Finn, M.A., Ruback, R.B., & Friedman, R.R. (1996). Individual and contextual influences on sentence lengths: Examining political conservatism. The Prison Journal, 76, 398-419.
26.
Jones, M. ( 2004). Community corrections. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
27.
Langan, P.A., & Levin, D.J. ( 2002, June). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
28.
Liebling, A. ( 2000). Prison officers, policing, and the use of discretion . Theoretical Criminology, 4, 333-357.
29.
McCleary, R. ( 1975). How structural variables constrain the parole officer’s use of discretionary powers. Social Problems, 23, 209-225.
30.
McCleary, R. ( 1978). Dangerous men: The sociology of parole. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
McGarrell, E.F. ( 1993). Institutional theory and the stability of a conflict model of the incarceration rate. Justice Quarterly, 10, 7-28.
32.
Michalowski, R.J., & Pearson, M.A. ( 1990). Punishment and social structure at the state level: A cross-sectional comparison of 1970 and 1980. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(1), 52-78.
33.
Myers, M.A., & Talarico, S.M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York/Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
34.
Nieto, M. ( 2003). Adult parole and probation in California. Sacramento: California Research Bureau.
35.
Petersilia, J. ( 2001). When prisoners return to communities: Political, economic, and social consequences. Federal Probation, 65(1), 3-8.
36.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. ( 1990). Intensive supervision for high risk offenders: Three California experiments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
37.
Poole, E.D., & Regoli, R.M. ( 1980). Race, institutional rule breaking, and disciplinary responses: A study of discretionary decision-making in prison. Law and Society Review, 14, 931-946.
38.
Rosecrance, J. ( 1987). Getting rid of the prima donnas: The bureaucratization of a probation department. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 138-155.
39.
Snell, T.L. ( 2000). Bureau of Justice Statistics bulletin: Capital punishment 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
40.
Steen, S., & Opsal, T. ( 2007). Punishment on the installment plan: Individual-level predictors of parole revocation in four states. The Prison Journal, 87, 344-366.
41.
The Sentencing Project. (2006). New incarceration figures: Thirty-three consecutive years of growth. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Tischler, C.A., & Marquart, J.W. (1989). Analysis of disciplinary infraction rates among male and female inmates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 507-513.
43.
Travis, J., & Lawrence, S. ( 2002). Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America . Washington, DC: The Urban Institute .
44.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1996, June). Probation and parole population reaches almost 3.8 million. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). Parole violations revisited. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
Ulmer, J. ( 1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York.
47.
Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J.H. ( 1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology , 34, 383-408.
48.
Vigorita, M. ( 2001). Prior offense type and the probability of incarceration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15, 167-193.
49.
Weidner, R.R., & Frase, R.S. ( 2001). A county-level comparison of the propensity to sentence felons to prison. International Journal of Comparative Criminology , 1(1), 1-22.
50.
Weidner, R.R., & Frase, R.S. ( 2003). Legal and extralegal determinants of intercounty differences in prison use. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 377-400.
51.
Weidner, R.R., Frase, R., & Pardoe, I. ( 2004). Explaining sentence severity in large urban counties: A multilevel analysis of contextual and case-level factors. The Prison Journal, 84, 184-207.
52.
Wilson, J.Q., & Petersilia, J. (2002). Crime: Public policies for crime control. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
