Qualitative research on Black girls’ violent delinquency concentrates on how girls navigate the matrix of domination in crafting gendered identities and reputations that provide a sense of safety and dignity and that prove relevant for violence. Despite evidence that variations in skin tone structure Black girls’ lives and gender identities in ways that inform behavior, quantitative analyses have not focused on documenting relationships between skin tone, feminine identities, and violence. This article extends the choice within constraints framework to consider how skin tone shapes across and within race differences in gender identities, racialized and gendered reputational challenges, and violence. Hypotheses from the framework are tested using data from a southeastern middle school and mediation regression analysis. The findings reveal that dark-complexioned Black girls are more likely than light-complexioned Black girls and White girls to engage in violence. Differences in violent delinquency between light-complexioned Black girls and White girls are negligible. Skin tone differentials in violence between Black girls with dark and light complexions are explained by structural disadvantages. Differences between dark-complexioned Black girls and White girls are explained by resilient feminine identities and gendered and racialized reputational challenges, supporting the choice within constraints framework.
BemS. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
4.
BlakeJ. J.KeithV. M.LuoW.LeH.SalterP. (2017). The role of colorism in explaining African American females’ suspension risk. School Psychology Quarterly, 32, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000173
5.
CohenA. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Free Press.
6.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
7.
CollinsP. H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. Routledge.
8.
ConnellR. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford University Press.
9.
ConnellR. W. (1995). Masculinities. University of California Press.
10.
ConnellR. W. (2000). The men and the boys. University of California Press.
11.
DavisA. Y. (1981). Women, race, & class. Vintage.
12.
De CosterS.HeimerK. (2006). Crime at the intersections: Gender, race, and violent offending. In PetersonR.KrivoL.HaganJ. (Eds.), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity and crime in America (pp. 138–156). New York University Press.
13.
De CosterS.HeimerK. (2017). Choice within constraint: An explanation of crime at the intersections. Theoretical Criminology, 21, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616677494
14.
De CosterS.ThompsonM. S. (2016). Race and general strain theory: Microaggressions as mundane extreme environmental stresses. Justice Quarterly, 34, 903–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1236204
15.
De CosterS.ZitoR. C. (2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986209359853
EpsteinR.BlakeJ.GonzálezT. (2017). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000695
19.
GlennE. N. (2009). Shades of difference: Why skin color matters. Stanford University Press.
20.
GoodkindS.WallaceJ. M.ShookJ. J.BachmanJ.O’MalleyP. (2009). Are girls really becoming more delinquent? Testing the gender convergence hypothesis by race and ethnicity, 1975-2005. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.04.002
HamiltonL. T.ArmstrongE. A.SeeleyJ. L.ArmstrongE. M. (2019). Hegemonic femininities and intersectional domination. Sociological Theory, 37, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119888248
25.
HannonL.De FinaR.BruchS. (2013). The relationship between skin tone and school suspension for African Americans. Race and Social Problems, 5, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-013-9104-z
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press.
HillM. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference?Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090169
29.
HillS. (2004). Black intimacies: A gender perspective on families and relationships. Rowman & Littlefield.
30.
hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End Press.
31.
HunterM. (2002). “If you’re light you’re alright”: Light skin color as social capital for women of color. Gender & Society, 16, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912430222104895
HunterM. (2016). Colorism in the classroom: How skin tone stratifies African American and Latina/o students. Theory Into Practice, 55, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1119019
34.
IrwinK.AdlerC. (2012). Fighting for her honor: Girls’ violence in distressed communities. Feminist Criminology, 7, 350–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085112436837
35.
JonesN. (2009). Between good and ghetto: African American girls and inner-city violence. Rutgers University Press.
36.
KeithV. M. (2009). A colorstruck world: Skin tone, achievement and self-esteem among African American women. In GlennE. N. (Ed.), Shades of difference: Why skin color matters (pp. 25–39). Stanford University Press.
37.
KeithV. M.HerringC. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 760–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/229819
38.
KeithV. M.NguyenA. W.TaylorR. J.MouzonD. M.ChattersL. M. (2017). Microaggressions, discrimination, and phenotype among African Americans. Sociological Inquiry, 87, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12168
39.
LadnerJ. A. (1995). Tomorrow’s tomorrow: The Black woman (2nd ed.). The University of Nebraska Press.
40.
LaidlerK. J.HuntG. (2001). Accomplishing femininity among the girls in the gang. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 656–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.4.656
41.
LernerR. M.PhelpsE.AlbertsA.FormanY.ChristiansenE. D. (2007). The many faces of urban girls: Features of positive development in early adolescence. In LeadbeaterB. J.WayN. (Eds.), Urban girls revisited (pp. 17–52). New York University Press.
42.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime. Rowman and Littlefield.
43.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (1997). Crime and structured action: Gender, race, class, and crime in the making. Sage.
MillerJ. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs and gender. Oxford University Press.
46.
MillerJ. (2002). The strengths and limits of “doing gender” for understanding street crime. Theoretical Criminology, 6, 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/136248060200600403
47.
MillerJ. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality, and gendered violence. New York University Press.
48.
MillerJ.MullinsC. W. (2005). Stuck up, telling lies and talking too much: The gendered context of young women’s violence. In HeimerK.KruttschnittC. (Eds.), Gender and crime: Patterns of victimization and offending (pp. 41–66). New York University.
49.
MorrisE. W. (2007). Ladies or Loudies? Perceptions and experiences of Black girls in classrooms. Youth and Society, 38, 490–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X06296778
50.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2017). Girls behaving badly? Race, gender, and subjective evaluation in the discipline of African American girls. Sociology of Education, 91, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717694876
51.
MorrisM. W. (2015). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. New Press.
52.
NessC. D. (2010). Why girls fight: Female youth violence in the inner city. New York University Press.
53.
PotterH. (2008). Battle cries: Black women and intimate partner abuse. New York University Press.
54.
RiosV. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York University Press.
55.
SchippersM. (2007). Recovering the feminine other: Masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony. Theory and Society, 36, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9022-4
56.
SteffensmeierD.SchwartzJ.SlepickaJ.ZhongH. (2023). Twenty-first century trends in girls’ violence and the gender gap: Triangulated findings from official longitudinal sources. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38, 9818–9844. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231169733
57.
UnneverJ. D.GabbidonS. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending. Taylor & Francis.
WilliamsD. R.YuY.JacksonJ. S.AndersonN. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress, and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305
61.
WilmotJ. M.MigliariniV.AnnammaS. A. (2021). Policy as punishment and distraction: The double helix of racialized sexual harassment of Black girls. Educational Policy, 35, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820984467
