Is There a Mediating Factor Between Specific Learning Disabilities and School Dropouts?

Abstract

Much dropout research has found that being diagnosed with specific learning disabilities increases the risk of dropping out of school. While previous studies have found mixed results for the impact of low socioeconomic status on dropouts among students with specific learning disabilities, they are not conclusive because of sample selection bias. We hypothesized that specific learning disabilities, in combination with poverty, can have the greatest impact on dropouts. We tested our hypothesis in Puerto Rico, where the percentage of the adult population without a high school diploma is double the proportion in the United States. We used individual data from all students in the Puerto Rico public education system during the period 2015 to 2021 and estimated a panel logistic regression with random effects. The mediating effect of poverty was statistically significant, and its associations with attrition were invariant to model specification. This research offers some recommendations to reduce school dropout.

JEL Codes: I2, I21, I30

Keywords

dropout disaster specific learning disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abril-Valdez

Román-Pérez

Cubillas-Rodríguez

M. J.

Moreno-Celaya

(2008). ¿Deserción o autoexclusión? Un análisis de las causas de abandono escolar en estudiantes de educación media superior en Sonora, México. [Dropout or self-exclusion? An analysis of schooling abandonment in mid- to high-school students in Sonora, Mexico]. Revista Electrónica De Investigación Educativa, 10(1), 1–16. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412008000100007

Boisjoly

Harris

K. M.

Duncan

G. J.

(1998). Trends, events, and duration of initial welfare spells. Social Service Review, 72(4), 466–492.

Caballero Álvarez

(2011). El diseño curricular como estrategia para la incorporación de la perspectiva de género en la educación superior [Curriculum design as a strategy to incorporate gender perspective in high-school education]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, XLI, 45–64. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/270/27022351003.pdf

Campbell

(2015). The socioeconomic consequences of dropping out of high school: Evidence from an analysis of siblings. Social Science Research, 51, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.011

Campolieti

Fang

Gunderson

(2010). Labour market outcomes and skill acquisition of high-school dropouts. Journal of Labor Research, 31, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-009-9074-5

Caspi

Wright

B. R. E.

Moffitt

T. E.

Silva

P. A.

(1998). Early failure in the labor market: Childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657557

Christle

C. A.

Jolivette

Nelson

C. M.

(2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280060201

Cook

P. J.

Kang

(2016). Birthdays, schooling, and crime: Regression-discontinuity analysis of school performance, delinquency, dropout, and crime initiation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20140323

Crespo Cuaresma

(2010). Natural disasters and human capital accumulation. The World Bank Economic Review, 24(2), 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhq008

10.

Department of Education. (2023). Individual data obtained under a collaborative agreement. https://ciie.dde.pr/Registers/Register.aspx

11.

Díaz Flores

(2014). Los servicios educativos suplementarios y su contribución a mejorar el aprovechamiento académico: Perspectiva de la comunidad educativa [Supplemental educational services and their contribution to the improvement of academic performance: The perspective of the educational community] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad del Turabo. https://gurabo.uagm.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/Centro-Estudios-Doctorales/Tesis_Doctorales/2014/RDiaz.pdf

12.

Doren

Murray

Gau

J. M.

(2014). Salient predictors of school dropout among secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(4), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12044

13.

Enchautegui

M. E.

Arroyo

Blakely

(2021). Colgando de un hilo: El sistema de protección social de Puerto Rico y la movilidad económica de las familias [Hanging by a thread: The social safety net of Puerto Rico and economic mobility of families]. Instituto del Desarrollo de la Juventud. https://parsefiles.back4app.com/KYIpu8OigEv1cAsrDK3d3SRSI0Nn9PhgAvItcFEW/17eb3598713b41503a050e6b992afc9e_colgando3-compressed.pdf

14.

Glewwe

Siameh

Sun

Wisniewski

(2021). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries. In McCall

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the economics of education (pp. 218–252). Routledge.

15.

Grigorenko

E. L.

Compton

D. L.

Fuchs

L. S.

Wagner

R. K.

Willcutt

E. G.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452

16.

Gubbels

van der Put

C. E.

Assink

(2019). Risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(9), 1637–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5

17.

Hausman

J. A.

(1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827

18.

Heckman

J. J.

LaFontaine

P. A.

(2006). Bias-corrected estimates of GED returns. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 661–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/504278

19.

Kézdi

(2004). Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hungarian Statistical Review Special, 9, 96–116. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.596988

20.

Koc

Celik

(2015). The impact of number of students per teacher on student achievement. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.335

21.

Martinez-Torres

K. A.

Camarata

(2022). Disability eligibility patterns in head start programs: A comparison of Puerto Rico and the United States. Inclusion, 10(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-10.2.134

22.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Students with disabilities. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg/students-with-disabilities

23.

National Hurricane Center. (2018). Costliest U.S. tropical cyclones tables updated. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/news/UpdatedCostliest.pdf

24.

Nguyen

C. V.

Pham

N. M.

(2018). The impact of natural disasters on children’s education: Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam. Review of Development Economics, 22(4), 1561–1589. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12406

25.

Puerto Rico Department of Education. (2024). Specific learning disabilities. https://de.pr.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/EDU09-OPUS-EE-Problemas-especificos-de-Aprendizaje.pdf

26.

Quiles

C. M.

(2015). Debate on the reclassification of special education students [ Debaten reclasificación de alumnos de educación especial ]. https://www.primerahora.com/noticias/gobierno-politica/notas/debaten-reclasificacion-de-alumnos-de-educacion-especial/

27.

Reschly

A. L.

Christenson

S. L.

(2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050301

28.

Sacerdote

(2008). When the saints come marching in: Effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on student evacuees (No. w14385). National Bureau of Economic Research.

29.

Segarra

Caraballo-Cueto

Cordero

(2022). The effect of consecutive disasters on educational outcomes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 83, Article 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103398

30.

Skrondal

Rabe-Hesketh

(2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. CRC Press.

31.

Stearns

Glennie

E. J.

(2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth & Society, 38(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X05282764

32.

Suh

(2007). Risk factors and levels of risk for high school dropouts. Professional School Counseling, 10(3), Article 1000312.

33.

Tas

Selvitopu

Bora

Demirkaya

(2013). Reasons for dropout for vocational high school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1561–1565. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1398

34.

The Associated Press. (2015). Puerto Rico reaches deal in 1980 special education lawsuit. https://www.ksl.com/article/34933192/puerto-rico-reaches-deal-in-1980-special-education-lawsuit

35.

Beatriz Saraiva

Pereira

B. O.

Zamith-Cruz

(2011). School dropout, problem behaviour and poor academic achievement: A longitudinal view of Portuguese male offenders. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2011.616351

36.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). Sex by educational attainment for the population 25 years and over. https://data.census.gov/table?t=Age+and+Sex:Education

37.

Vázquez

V. N.

(2012). Factores que inciden en la deserción escolar: Hacia un modelo descriptivo para líderes educativos [Factors that affect school dropout: Towards a descriptive model for educational leaders]. University of Puerto Rico at Rio Piedras. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com-s.web.bisu.edu.cn/docview/1020617169

38.

Wiener

(2004). Do peer relationships foster behavioral adjustment in children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593629

39.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2003). Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. The American Economic Review, 93(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946930

40.

Zablocki

Krezmien

M. P.

(2013). Drop-out predictors among students with high-incidence disabilities: A national longitudinal and transitional study 2 analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311427726