Development of robust control law for active buffeting load alleviation of smart fin structures

Abstract

Aerodynamic buffeting load can lead to premature fatigue damage of aircraft vertical fin structures. This article presents a robust control law development strategy for active buffeting load alleviation of a smart fin structure. The impact of aerodynamic loads on the modeling uncertainties of the smart fin was investigated through extensive wind tunnel tests. Test results revealed that the airflow introduced higher damping ratio and caused frequency shift to the vibration modes. These aerodynamic effects may adversely affect the performance and robustness of active control laws. Based on the observations, the structured singular value synthesis technique was used to develop a robust control law for the smart fin using a truncated baseline dynamic model. A parametric uncertainty block was introduced to account for the changes in the modal parameters of the baseline dynamic model due to the aerodynamic effects. An additive uncertainty block was included to account for the unmodeled higher-order vibration modes as well as the modeling errors in the low frequency range. The robust performance of the control law was demonstrated through simulations as well as extensive closed-loop control experiments in the wind tunnel using various free airstreams and vortical airflows. This provided a verified control law design strategy for active buffeting alleviation applications.

Keywords

Buffeting load alleviation vertical fin vibration control robust control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Breitsamter

(2005) Aerodynamic active control for fin-buffet load alleviation. Journal of Aircraft 42(5): 1252–1262.

Breitsamter

(2006) Airbrake induced fin buffet loads on fighter aircraft. In: 25th International Congress of the aeronautical sciences, 3–8 September 2006, Hamburg, Germany.

Browning

(2009) F-16 ventral fin buffet alleviation using piezoelectric actuators. Master Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.

Burnham

Pitt

White

. (2001) An advanced buffet load alleviation system. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibition, 16–19 April 2001, Seattle, WA.

Chen

Wickramasinghe

Zimcik

(2006) Active control of a hybrid actuation system for aircraft vertical fin buffet load alleviation. Aeronautical Journal 110(1107): 315–326.

Chen

Wickramasinghe

Zimcik

(2007) Development of smart structure systems for helicopter vibration and noise control. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering 31(1): 39–56.

Conser

Graham

Smith

. (1996) The application of dynamic loads to a full scale F/A-18 fatigue test article. In: 20th Congress of the International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, 8–13 September 1996, Sorrento, Napoli, Italy.

Ferman

Liguore

Colvin

. (1993) Composite exoskin doubler extends F-15 vertical tail fatigue life. In: 34th AIAA structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 19–22 April 1993, La Jolla, CA.

Galea

Henderson

Moses

. (2003) Next generation active buffet suppression system. In: 2003 AIAA/ICAS international air and space symposium and exposition: the next 100 years, 14–17 July 2003, Dayton, OH.

10.

Hauch

Jacobs

Dima

. (1996) Reduction of vertical tail buffet response using active control. Journal of Aircraft 33(3): 617–622.

11.

Hopkins

Henderson

Moses

. (1998) Active vibration suppression systems applied to twin tail buffeting. In: SPIE smart structures and materials conference: industrial and commercial applications of smart structures technologies, 1–3 March 1998, San Diego, CA.

12.

Luber

Becker

Sensburg

(1998) The impact of dynamic load on the design of military aircraft, loads and requirements for military aircraft. In: 16th international modal analysis conference, 2–5 February 1998, Santa Barbara, CA.

13.

Nalbantoglu

Balas

Thomson

(1996) The role of performance criteria selection in the control of flexible structures. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conferences, 29–31 July 1996, San Diego, CA.

14.

Nitzsche

Liberatore

Zimcik

(2001a) Theoretical and experimental investigations on an active control system for vertical fin buffeting alleviation using strain actuation. Aeronautical Journal 105(1047): 277–285.

15.

Nitzsche

Zimcik

Ryall

. (2001b) Closed-loop control test for vertical fin buffeting alleviation using strain actuation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 24(4): 855–857.

16.

Patil

Hodges

(2004) On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behaviour of high-aspect-ratio wings. Journal of Fluids and Structures 19: 905–915.

17.

Pototzky

Moses

(2005) A method to analyze tail buffet loads of aircraft. In: RTO AVT symposium on flow-induced unsteady loads and the impact on military applications, 25–29 April 2005, Budapest, Hungary.

18.

Sheta

(2003) Buffet alleviation of F/A-18 aircraft using LEX fences. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 7–10 April 2003, Norfolk, VA.

19.

Wickramasinghe

Chen

Zimcik

(2005) Canadian contribution to the international buffet load alleviation program for F/A-18 vertical tail. In: CANSMART 2005: international workshop on smart materials and structures, 13–14 October 2005, Toronto, ON, Canada.

20.

Wickramasinghe

Chen

Zimcik

(2007) Experimental evaluation of a full-scale advanced hybrid buffet suppression system for the F/A-18 vertical tail. Journal of Aircraft 44(3): 733–740.