Damage detection in composite materials structures under variable loads conditions by using fiber Bragg gratings and principal component analysis,involving new unfolding and scaling methods
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2015
Damage detection in composite materials structures under variable loads conditions by using fiber Bragg gratings and principal component analysis,involving new unfolding and scaling methods
An innovative methodology based on the use of fiber Bragg gratings as strain sensors and strain field pattern recognition is proposed for damage detection in composite materials structures. The strain field pattern recognition technique is based on principal component analysis. Damage indices (T2 and Q) and detection thresholds are presented. New techniques for unfolding and scaling tridimensional matrices arrays obtained from structures working under variable load conditions are presented.
AdamsD (2007) Health Monitoring of Structural Materials and Components. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
2.
BalageasDFritzenCGüemesA (2006) Structural Health Monitoring. London: ISTE—Hermes Science.
3.
BasevilleMBenvenisteAGoursatM. (2007) In-flight vibration monitoring of aeronautical structures. IEEE Control Systems Magazine (27): 27–42.
4.
BoxG (1954) Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems: Effect of inequality of variance in one-way classification. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics (25): 290–302.
5.
CulshawBKerseyA (2008) Fiber optic sensing: A historical perspective. IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology26: 1064–1078.
6.
DoeblingSFarrarCPrimeM (1998) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest (30): 91–105.
7.
FernándezAMenéndezJGüemesA (2007) Damage detection in a stiffened curved plate by measuring differential strains. In: International conference on composite materials.
8.
FritzenCPBohleK (2003) Global damage identification of the steelquake structure using modal data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (17): 111–117.
9.
FritzenC-PKraemerP (2009) Self-diagnosis of smart structures based on dynamical properties. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (23): 1830–1845.
10.
FritzenCPJenneweinDKieferT (1998) Damage detection based on model updating methods. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (12): 163–186.
11.
FritzenCPLiHNLiDS (2009) A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (23): 1160–1168.
12.
GarcíaC (2010) Caracterización de coeficientes de expansión térmica. (In Spanish.) Technical report, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain.
13.
GhatakAThyagarajanK (1998) Introduction to Fiber Optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GüemesAMenéndezJ (2006) Fiber optics sensors. In: BalageasDFritzenCGüemesA (eds) Structural Health Monitoring. New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
GüemesASierraJ (2013) Fiber optic sensors. In: OstachowiczWGüemesA (eds) New Trends in Structural Health Monitoring. New York, NY: Springer.
16.
GurdenSWesterhuisJBroR. (2001) A comparison of multi-way regression and scaling methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems (59): 121–136.
17.
HillKMeltzG (1997) Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview. IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology15: 1263–1276.
18.
Holnicki-SzulcJ (2008) Smart Technologies for Safety Engineering. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
HuedoTSánchezJMarínF. (2006) Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q static or I2 index. Psychological Methods (11): 193–206.
20.
JacksonEMudholkarG (1979) Control procedures for residual associates with PCA. Technometrics (21): 341–349.
JollifeI (2002) Principal Component Analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
23.
KourtiTMacGregorJ (1995) Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems (28): 3–21.
24.
LiDSLiHNFritzenCP (2012) Load dependent sensor placement method: Theory and experimentation validation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (31): 217–227.
25.
LopezISarigul-KlijnN (2010) A review of uncertainty in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring, diagnosis and control: Challenges and opportunities. Progress in Aerospace Sciences46: 247–273.
26.
MansonGWordenKHolfordK. (2001) Visualization and dimension reduction of acoustic emission data for damage detection. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures12(8): 529–536.
27.
MenéndezJGüemesA (2005) Embedded fibre Bragg gratings for design and manufacturing optimisation of advanced composites. In: Proceedings of the 4th IWSHM.
28.
MujicaLRodellarAFernándezA. (2011) Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures. Structural Health Monitoring10: 539–553.
29.
MujicaLTibaduizaDRodellarJ (2010) Data driven multiactuator piezoelectric system for structural damage localization. In: Fifth world conference on structural control and monitoring, pp. 1–13.
30.
MujicaLVehíJRuizM. (2008) Multivariate statistical process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (22): 155–171.
31.
NomikosPMacGregorJ (1994) Monitoring batch processes using multi-way principal component analysis. AIChE Journal (40): 1361–1375.
PetersK (2009) Fiber Bragg grating sensors. In: CBollerFKChangYFujino (eds) Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring. New York, NY: Wiley.
34.
SierraJGüemesA (2011) Detección de daño en materiales compuestos mediante fibra óptica. (In Spanish.) In: Actas del IX congreso nacional de materiales compuestos, pp. 631–636.
35.
SierraJGüemesAMujicaL (2013) Damage detection by using FBGs and strain field pattern recognition techniques. Smart Materials and Structures (22): 1–10.
36.
SohnHWordenKFarrarC (2002) Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures13: 561–574.
37.
SulemanA (2011) An SHM overview. In: New trends in structural health monitoring, pp. 1–56.
38.
TakedaNOkabeYKuwaharaJ. (2005) Lamb wave sensing using fiber Bragg grating sensors for delamination detection in composite laminates. In: Proceedings of the SPIE.
39.
VillezKSteppeKDe PauwD (2009) Use of unfold PCA for on-line plant stress monitoring and sensor failure detection. Biosystems Engineering (103): 23–34.
40.
WesterhuisJKourtiTMacGregorJ (1999) Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data. Journal of Chemometrics (13): 397–413.
41.
WoldSKettanehNFridenH. (1998) Modelling and diagnostics of batch processes and analogous kinetic experiments. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems (44): 331–340.
